Regulating Invasive Species

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Republic of Korea
Delegate Name: Amirah Medlen-Ellis

Invasive species is a major threat to the global economies. The cost is about $423 billion a year and it has been quadrupling every decade since 1970. Regulating these alien species would help to improve biodiversity, agriculture, and the economy worldwide. Each year the invasive species of plants and animals populations increase and it causes a decrease in the native populations, affecting not only the wildlife but also the local citizens. Around 60% of all global extinctions are due to alien species causing harm to the biodiversity of these locations. As of 2023, 37,000 alien species have been spread around the globe and without regulating them this number is continuing to increase and cause for the native populations to go extinct.
Kora is facing this major problem of having an increase in the number of alien species. To combat this we are developing the “Fifth National Biodiversity Strategy” to protect biodiversity. With being a country with a very biodiverse population having majority of the land be mountainous lands and being surrounded by bodies of water, biodiversity protection of the country is found to be very important. In the country’s plans there is a goal for stricter regulations on importation and managing any way that they can be introduced into the ecosystems. Korea will work to restore destroyed native populations and continue to monitor these things. One way in which that Korea has already enacted this was the conservation of the Umyeonsan Mountain. A plant research team worked to take out the alien flora and plant more native ones. They brought in community engagement by having nearby citizens join in which allows for awareness in the general public.
Korea proposes that the rest of the UN follows suit with the “Fifth National Biodiversity Strategy”. It would be beneficial to have the general public be made aware of how invasive species negatively affect the global population. If all countries also monitored imports and exports the spread should be kept to a minimum. Growth of native species and alien species should be monitored to make sure everything is on track. By being strict on following this plan native species can be restored and invasive species would cause little to no harm.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Libya
Delegate Name: Ellora Natarajan

Invasive species have long tormented ecosystems, forming a large threat to biodiversity and humans. It is defined as, “species which become established in a natural or semi-natural ecosystem or habitat, are an agent of change, and threaten native biological diversity”. According to the Wiley Online Library, 29 species of invasive aliens in Libya have been found. This number is far too high, as it poses a serious risk to native plants and animals, potentially causing extinction and extensive damage to the ecosystem and biodiversity as a whole. Furthermore, the number of marine alien species in Libyan waters has increased from 63 to 73 – a shocking statistic. Some of the highest percentages were fishes (32.88%), followed by macrophytes (21.92%), mollusks (16.44%), crustaceans (13.70%), and parasites (9.59%).
However, some alien fishes have become commercially valuable in Libya. The biological invasion in the Libyan coasts has been an attempt to fill the gap of knowledge on the alien species in the southeastern Mediterranean coast.
According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation, Libya is aiming to eliminate the Red Palm Weevil, a small beetle-like insect that has infested parts of Libya. The Red Palm Weevil is one of the world’s major invasive pest species and is the single most destructive pest of some 40 palm species worldwide. The nation is hoping to reduce its devastating effects on the environment and food security, and socio-economic impact on rural communities.
To do this, the nation will focus on governance through supporting policies and regulations for sustainable management of the Red Palm Weevil, including phytosanitary and quarantine management practices for fast eradication of RPW and rational use of pesticides.
Sources:
“Invasive Alien Species in Libya” by Mohammed H. Mahklouf and Esmail A. Shakman (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119607045.ch6#:~:text=A%20total%20of%2029%20species,with%20one%20 spe%2D%20cos%20 each)
“Libya joins the race to eradicate Red Palm Weevil” (https://www.fao.org/neareast/news/details/Libya-joins-the-race-to-eradicate-Red-Palm-Weevil/ar)

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Vietnam
Delegate Name: Abigail Strazisar

Vietnam struggles with many prominent invasive species, an issue that has been ongoing for years. Some examples of invasive species include Golden Apple Snails and Khapra Beetles. Both species directly affect economic income sources, such as rice crops and other crucial farms contributing to the country’s overall financial well-being.

The impact that invasive species have goes beyond just crops. Whether intentional or not, the spread of invasive species typically comes from transatlantic trade. Many of the specimens spread unintentionally and end up finding themselves in places they aren’t supposed to be, such as large farms or protected land. These specimens also typically come with various diseases and unwanted sicknesses that can spread to the local wildlife and massively affect the interactions and balance between nature.

Vietnam has taken action against these threats by collaborating with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to target select forests and find ways to extract invasive species from the environment. This collaboration also works to introduce policies that will further protect the environment from such invasive species and keep the ecosystems functioning healthily and as they should.
The initiative lasted about 5 years (2011-2016), which gave plenty of time to experiment and control wildlife throughout the country.
Thanks to the work of CABI and various other teams throughout Vietnam, the threat of invasive species has been lessened. There are also more protections in place will will stand to keep this initiative running and saving our resources for generations to come.

Citations:

“An Overview of Two Invasive Species and National Response in Viet Nam.” FAO, 24 Jun. 2002, www.fao.org/4/ag117e/AG117E12.htm. Accessed 14 Feb. 2025.

“Managing Invasive Species in Selected Forest Ecosystems of South East Asia.” CABI, 30 Sept. 2016, www.cabi.org/projects/managing-invasive-species-in-selected-forest-ecosystems-of-south-east-asia/. Accessed 14 Feb. 2025.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: United States of America
Delegate Name: Ryan Wu

Committee: IUCN
School: Greenhills School

Invasive Species are not-native or alien to the environment in which they are currently living and cause harm to surrounding environments, economics, or humans. Invasive species are spread primarily through human activities unintentionally. Some of the most common ways are through ship ballast water, firewood, shipping containers, and accidental release. The introduction and establishment of any type of invasive species poses a threat to native plant and animal communities and destroys biodiversity. Their interference in the natural ecosystem can permanently alter and damage habitats, negatively impacting the native environments. In 1993, the Convention on Biological Diversity was put into effect, with the objective of protecting biodiversity overall, and specifically calls on parties to control invasive species in Article 8H. Other initiatives include the International Plant Protection Convention, which works to protect the spread of invasive species that may harm plants, as well as the IUCN itself, which retains a database for invasive species.

The United States of America considers invasive species to be a serious risk and is working to mitigate their spread. However, the U.S. often has its own approaches to controlling invasive species separate from UN and international standards due to various reasons, such as strict trade restrictions, high regulatory costs, and conflicts with domestic policies. Instead, the U.S. uses various laws and domestic agencies to contain them. Domestically, The U.S. established the National Invasive Species Council in 1999 to organize federal efforts in managing invasive species. The Lacey Act prohibits any importation, trade, or any type of transport of “injurious wildlife”, and the The National Invasive Species Act of 1996 provides much stricter regulations to ballast water than the International Maritime Organization’s. Different aspects of mitigating alien species are run by different departments (i.e. the U.S. Fish and Wildlife enforces the Lacey Act & the Coast Guard manages ballast water rules). The U.S. is currently working with other countries and participating with international groups to develop plans to help prevent species from traveling beyond borders and from being ‘imported’ as well as ‘exported’.

The United States of America would favor the IUCN adopting a framework to help regulate alien species. It should be noted that this is not an international law, but is rather acting as a guide for countries. This framework should include specific steps, beginning with collecting data and evidence needed to introduce measures. The U.S. believes that science should play a key role in tackling this problem, and encourages other nations to do the same. There should also be advice regarding stronger border policies, such as import/export restrictions, which would better help countries create legislation that would stop the flow of invasive species in and out of their soil. It should also be recommended that countries develop international partnerships with other nations leading to biosecurity measures, to better control species from the source and the destination. Through these partnerships, countries may also want to support each other through direct funding and assistance, helping other countries better prepare and equip themselves for combating this problem. However, the U.S. urges the IUCN to let member nations have freedom in deciding the policies to fight invasive species and to allow governments to work independently on this issue as well. In general, the United States of America would love to work with delegates from other nations to fight back against invasive species and restore natural environments.

— “Invasive Species.” UNDRR, 7 June 2023, www.undrr.org/understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/bi0005.
— Federal Government’s Response for Invasive Species | National Invasive Species Information Center. www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/federal-governments-response-invasive-species.
— “Lacey Act | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.” FWS.gov, www.fws.gov/law/lacey-act.
— “National Invasive Species Act of 1996 | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.” FWS.gov, 29 Nov. 1990, www.fws.gov/law/national-invasive-species-act-1996.
— “Ballast Water Management.” DNV, www.dnv.com/maritime/ballast-water-management.
— “U.S. Department of The Interior Invasive Species Strategic Plan.” U.S. Department of The Interior Invasive Species Strategic Plan, report, U.S. Department of the Interior, 2021, p. 54. www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/doi-invasive-species-strategic-plan-2021-2025-508.pdf.
— “International Cooperation | U.S. Department of the Interior.” U.S. Department of The Interior, www.doi.gov/invasivespecies/international_cooperation.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Bangladesh
Delegate Name: Luke Zagorski

According to a paper published in Science Direct Bangladesh currently has 69 different invasive alien species that plague Bangladesh. This includes 49 species of plants, 16 species of fish, and 5 species of insects. Bangladesh has many diverse biomes, such as the Sundarban wetlands, that are homes to hundreds of species that are at risk to these invasive species. Invasive species, particularly in wet climates like that of most of Bangladesh, are always a threat to native species. They have different climates that sometimes have more competition and so when they are introduced to new areas they often outcompete the local species. In order to preserve biodiversity and protect the environment of Bangladesh it is important to invest resources into fighting invasive species in Bangladesh.
Invasive species are present in all regions of Bangladesh but particularly in the Sundarbans wetland mangrove forests invasive species have done significant damage. Mangroves require very specific environmental factors to be successful and any disturbances, such as those caused by invasive species, are very detrimental to the health of the forests. In the Sundarbans mangrove forests almost 88% of the area is affected by invasive species. 55% of that region has been “severely damaged” by the effects of invasive species. The Sundarbans is the largest mangrove forest in the world and the species of it make up a large part of Bangladesh’s biodiversity. It is our job as a council to fight against environmental degradation and to protect global biodiversity and protecting the Sundarbans and other natural areas of Bangladesh from invasive species is very important in the global protection of biodiversity and the environment.
Sources:
https://bioceed.uib.no/dropfolder/bioPOSTERS/Posters/V22/SDG215/215_1.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235198942030737X
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/invasive.html#:~:text=Invasive%20species%20are%20capable%20of,coastal%20and%20Great%20Lakes%20ecosystems.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Brazil
Delegate Name: Wilden Olger

Committee: IUCN
Country: Brazil
Delegate: Wilden Olger
Topic B: Regulating Invasive Species

Invasive species pose a huge threat to biodiversity due to their ability to outcompete native species, driving them to endangerment and extinction. Brazil considers Invasive species especially important, as we have over 500 invasive species, consisting mainly of plants and fish. This threat to biodiversity is concerning, as Brazil hosts 15-20 percent of the worlds biological diversity, so protecting it becomes essential (Thematic Assessment) (Bioinvasion and). These invasive species can be dangerous to some of Brazil’s important native species, such as the mangrove, and are extremely difficult to get rid of without the use of chemicals that could have their own effects on the environment (Brown). Additionally, invasive species can transmit disease, and cost Brazil 15 billion in annual losses (Alisson). Brazil needs to find short term solutions to deal with more dangerous species, and more environmentally friendly solutions to deal with the less dangerous ones.
Brazil currently mostly relies on NGOs and international cooperation to solve the issue. A Programme under the name CONTAIN, for example, was set up on the British Newton Fund, and performed research to find the best ways to deal with invasive species in Chile, Argentina, and Brazil (Contain – Latam). The research CONTAIN has performed has found that the best way to mitigate the effects of invasive species is not to completely eradicate them, which can have it’s own side effects, but to contain them and stop them from spreading further. However, Brazil has yet to act on this knowledge (Arantes). While this is the most effective way to deal with the threat, it is much more expensive to constantly manage each invasive species rather than just get rid of them. On top of that, some species pose too much of a threat to vulnerable yet important native species such as the mangrove, which could pose a serious risk if those species aren’t dealt with quickly or managed properly. In this case, chemicals are usually the quickest, best, and least labor intensive option (Brown). In the case of protecting dangerous, yet essential species, the side effects the chemicals may have are vastly outweighed by their benefits. As such, Brazil believes that we should use chemicals to deal with the most dangerous of invasive species, and work to contain the less widespread or dangerous species to minimize the negative impacts on the environment.
Based on previous legislation, Brazil is seeking for international cooperation in research on the best ways to deal with these invasive species, and doesn’t support forced regulations on chemicals that may have other environmental side effects in cases where there are important native species that need to be saved. Brazil supports a resolution that involves sorting invasive species into tiers on factors such as the best way to deal with them and how much of a threat they pose to the environment, so focus points can be identified and dealt with as quickly and cost effectively as possible.

Works Cited
Alisson, Elton. “Dengue-bearing mosquito and other invasive species in Brazil cause annual losses of up to BRL 15 billion.” FAPESP, 4 march 2024, https://agencia.fapesp.br/dengue-bearing-mosquito-and-other-invasive-species-in-brazil-cause-annual-losses-of-up-to-brl-15-billion/51264.
Arantes, José Tadeu. “A research group proposes six guidelines for managing the impacts of invasive species.” Phys.org, 1 March 2021, https://phys.org/news/2021-03-group-guidelines-impacts-invasive-species.html. Accessed 13 February 2025.
Brown, Sarah. “Experts call for urgent action as invasive species threatens Brazil mangroves.” Mongabay, 17 September 2024, https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/experts-call-for-urgent-action-as-invasive-species-threatens-brazil-mangroves/. Accessed 13 February 2025.
“(Contain – Latam).” The University of Aberdeen.
“Thematic assessment report on invasive alien species in Brazil: summary for policymakers.” SciELO Brazil, 1 July 2024, https://www.scielo.br/j/bn/a/Q8Lm5FM8tJkLkBGJchNP49F/?lang=en.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Canada
Delegate Name: Keegan Troccko

Committee: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)
Topic: Regulating Invasive Species
State: Canada
School: Grand Haven High School
Author: Keegan Troccko

The deliberate or accidental introductions of invasive species can be devastating to the Canadian economy and environment. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) plays an active and important role in helping to keep harmful foreign species of animals, plants, and microorganisms from entering Canadian ecosystems. With the growing volume of trade, travel, and tourism, new invasive species are continually arriving at Canada’s border by air, land, and water. Legislation plays an important role in the regulation and management of invasive species and pathways of spread in Canada. On a federal level, legislation regulates ballast water management, fisheries management, and the movement of wildlife, pathogens, and pests – all of which can play a role in invasive species spread.

Invasive species are considered one of Canada’s greatest threats to the survival of wild animals and plant life. The Fisheries Act (1985) allows Canada’s government to establish a list of aquatic invasive species and create regulations with respect to the management and control of these species. This includes regulations regarding the prevention, possession, release, handling, treatment, and eradication of aquatic invasive species. The Invasive Species Act (2015) can be used to regulate the prevention and management of invasive species. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) calls on its parties to ‘prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species’. Although these acts were put into place Canada still has a problem with invasive species that is still trying to be solved.

Some solutions that were given were the Fisheries Act in 1985 which allows Canada’s government to establish a list of aquatic invasive species and create regulations with respect to the management and control of these species. The Canadian government liked the Fisheries Act but they wanted to modernize it so they made changes such as restoring protections for fish and fish habitat, enhancing marine protection and habitat restoration, improving management of projects, preserving independent inshore fisheries, strengthening Indigenous role in project reviews, monitoring, and policy development Plants, animals and microorganisms that have moved beyond their native range to a non-native ecosystem are known as alien species. When the introduction and spread of alien species threaten the new environment, economy,y or society (including human health), they are considered invasive. Invasive alien species can cause environmental and economic damage to our waterways, food supply, and natural resources.

The Invasive Species Act sets out regulations to prevent and control the spread of invasive species. Species regulated under the act pose a risk to Ontario’s natural environment. We assess a species’ risk by looking at its biological characteristics, risk of harm to the natural environment, ability to disperse, and social and economic impacts. The Government of Canada is investing $36.6 million over five years to fight aquatic invasive species in Canada. This includes $8.75 million in contribution funding for Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s newly created AISPF over fiscal years 2022-23 to 2026-27. When you are inserting a regulated invasive species into an ecosystem that has invasive species the regulated invasive species will help stop the invasive species and Canada believes this to be a good idea so it can help the ecosystems. Because invasive species are destroying Canadian ecosystems and one way that we can help is by regulating invasive species.

Works Cited
“Invasive alien species in Canada.” canada.ca, 19 12 2024, https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-indicators/invasive-alien-species.html. Accessed 13 02 2025.
“Legislation and Policy – Invasive Species Centre.” Invasive Species Centre, https://www.invasivespeciescentre.ca/learn/legislation-and-policies/#ontario. Accessed 13 February 2025.
“Managing invasive species in Ontario.” Ontario, 19 6 2019, https://www.ontario.ca/page/managing-invasive-species-ontario. Accessed 13 2 2025.
“Protecting Canada from invasive species.” canada.ca, 13 10 2021, https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/services/fpa-apa/species-especes-eng.html#a6x3. Accessed 13 02 2025.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: People’s Republic of China
Delegate Name: Thi Bui

Topic: 2025-Conserving Wetlands
Country: China
Delegate Name: Thi Bui

Invasive species are a major environmental problem, threatening biodiversity, harming agriculture, and disrupting natural ecosystems. Introduced to new environments either accidentally or intentionally, they can spread rapidly and outcompete native species. Many countries, including China, have recognized the dangers of invasive species and have taken strong action to prevent their spread. China’s approach, which includes strict laws, border inspections, and public awareness campaigns, is an important example of how nations can work to protect their environments.
One of China’s most significant steps in managing invasive species is the Biosecurity Law, passed in 2022. This law makes it illegal to introduce non-native species without proper authorization and imposes strict penalties on those who violate the regulations (Sixth Tone). The goal of this law is to prevent invasive species from entering the country in the first place, as stopping them before they spread is far more effective than trying to remove them later.
In addition to legislation, China has launched the Three-Year Crackdown Campaign, led by the General Administration of Customs. This campaign focuses on increasing border inspections, using advanced technology to detect invasive species, and strengthening early warning systems (South China Morning Post). By improving monitoring at entry points like airports and shipping ports, China is reducing the chances of invasive species entering the country unnoticed.
Public awareness is another key aspect of China’s strategy. In early 2024, Beijing Customs intercepted 933 batches of prohibited animals, plants, and related products in just the first three months of the year (Global Times). These efforts show that enforcement is working, but they also highlight the importance of educating the public about the dangers of invasive species. By informing citizens about the risks, China is encouraging individuals to take responsibility and avoid actions that could introduce harmful species.
China’s efforts align with the goals of the IUCN, a global organization that guides on conservation issues. The IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) maintains a database that helps countries identify and manage invasive species. By following IUCN recommendations and working within international conservation frameworks, China is contributing to global efforts to protect biodiversity (UNDRR).
Invasive species are not just China’s problem—they are a global issue that requires international cooperation. Many countries, such as Australia, the United States, and members of the European Union, have also implemented strict biosecurity measures to prevent invasive species from entering their territories. China’s approach sets an example for other nations, showing that strong policies, strict enforcement, and public awareness campaigns can help protect native ecosystems.
By recognizing the dangers of invasive species and taking decisive action, China is demonstrating its commitment to environmental conservation. Supporting and learning from China’s strategies can help other countries strengthen their policies, leading to a more coordinated global effort against invasive species. If more nations follow this proactive approach, the world will be better equipped to protect its biodiversity and maintain healthy ecosystems for future generations.

Works Cited
Caiyu, Liu, and Zhang Wanshi. “Global Times.” China Society, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202404/1310699.shtml.
“China targets invasive plants and animals in 3-year crackdown.” South China Morning Post, 23 July 2023, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3228649/china-targets-invasive-plants-and-animals-3-year-crackdown. Accessed 11 February 2025.
Pasha, Li. “As They Swim, Fly, and Crawl In, China Wakes Up to Invasive Threat.” Sixth Tone, 20 March 2023, https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1012414. Accessed 11 February 2025

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Japan
Delegate Name: Molly Brunt

I. Background
Invasive alien species (IAS) pose a significant threat to global biodiversity, agriculture, and economies, as they disrupt native ecosystems and outcompete indigenous species. The introduction of non-native species has been largely driven by human activities, including trade, travel, and climate change-induced habitat shifts. Some of the most affected regions include island nations, where ecosystems are particularly fragile, and countries with high levels of trade, which increase the risk of accidental introductions. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), invasive species are one of the leading causes of biodiversity loss worldwide, with over 40% of threatened or endangered species at risk due to biological invasions.
The international community has recognized the urgency of this issue and has taken steps to mitigate the spread of invasive species. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), adopted in 1992, includes provisions aimed at preventing the introduction of IAS and controlling those already established. Additionally, the United Nations has passed various resolutions and initiatives, including the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, which set global goals to prevent and manage biological invasions. The UN General Assembly and agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have also worked on policies addressing the unintentional spread of IAS through trade and agriculture. Despite these efforts, invasive species continue to cause environmental and economic damage, highlighting the need for stronger international cooperation.
II. Policy
Japan, as an island nation with a unique and delicate ecosystem, has been significantly affected by invasive alien species. The introduction of non-native species has led to severe disruptions in native biodiversity, economic losses, and environmental degradation. Japan has taken proactive measures to address this issue through the Invasive Alien Species Act (IAS Act) of 2004, which strictly regulates the import, transport, and possession of invasive species. Additionally, Japan has implemented extensive monitoring and eradication programs, particularly for species such as the nutria (Myocastor coypus), the red-eared slider turtle, and the Taiwanese beauty snake, all of which have posed significant ecological threats.
Japan has actively participated in international discussions on IAS management, supporting global frameworks such as the CBD and the International Maritime Organization’s Ballast Water Management Convention, which aims to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species through shipping. Japan has also contributed to regional initiatives, such as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) efforts to strengthen biosecurity measures in trade. Japan has consistently supported UN resolutions that emphasize the need for international collaboration, research, and the development of standardized risk assessment frameworks. As a nation that relies heavily on its biodiversity for tourism, agriculture, and fisheries, Japan remains committed to strengthening policies to prevent the spread of invasive species at both the national and international levels.
III. Proposal
Japan urges the United Nations to take stronger and more coordinated action in combating invasive alien species. First, Japan proposes the establishment of a global database under the UN framework to facilitate real-time data sharing on invasive species distribution, management strategies, and emerging threats. This would enable countries to collaborate more effectively in monitoring and controlling IAS before they become widespread.
Additionally, Japan advocates for the harmonization of international regulations to prevent the spread of IAS through trade and transportation. Standardized quarantine procedures, biosecurity protocols, and risk assessment guidelines should be implemented across all member states to ensure consistency in addressing IAS threats. Japan also recommends that the UN encourage stricter enforcement of existing agreements, such as the Ballast Water Management Convention, to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species.
Capacity building and technical assistance should be prioritized, particularly for developing nations that may lack the necessary infrastructure to manage IAS effectively. Japan proposes that the UN establish funding mechanisms to support countries in developing and implementing IAS management programs. This could include training workshops, technology transfers, and financial support for rapid response measures in the event of new invasions.
Public awareness and education campaigns are also essential in preventing the introduction and spread of IAS. Japan suggests that the UN launch global initiatives to educate the public on the risks of releasing non-native species into the wild and the importance of early detection and reporting. Encouraging citizen science programs could also enhance monitoring efforts at the community level.
Finally, Japan urges the UN to integrate IAS management into climate change adaptation strategies. Climate change is altering ecosystems, creating new opportunities for invasive species to thrive. By incorporating IAS mitigation into broader environmental policies, the UN can ensure that biological invasions are addressed as part of global sustainability efforts.
By implementing these proposals, the UN can take meaningful steps to reduce the global threat of invasive species, protect biodiversity, and support sustainable development. Japan remains committed to working with the international community to strengthen IAS management and preserve ecological balance for future generations.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Germany
Delegate Name: Mira Jayaraman

Invasive species pose a significant threat to biodiversity, economic stability, and public health. Invasive species are species that disrupt ecosystems and endanger native species. They contribute to habitat destruction, agricultural losses, and more natural disasters. According to the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, the economic cost of invasive species worldwide is estimated at over $1.4 trillion annually.
Although there have been international efforts to combat invasive species (such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Ramsar Convention, and the International Maritime Organization’s Ballast Water Management Convention), global trade and climate change continue to accelerate the spread of invasive species. This calls for stronger policies to combat this growing problem.
Germany recognizes invasive species as a threatening environmental challenge and actively works to mitigate their impact. As an EU member state, Germany aligns with the EU Regulation on Invasive Alien Species (2015), which restricts the trade and introduction of harmful species. Germany’s Federal Nature Conservation Act strengthens national policies by enforcing strict monitoring, early detection, and control measures.
Germany also participates in LIFE+, an EU-funded program supporting invasive species management projects, and has implemented national action plans targeting invasive plants like giant hogweed and aquatic species such as the Chinese mitten crab. Internationally, Germany contributes to CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) and funds biodiversity protection through the Global Environment Facility (GEF).
Despite these various programs designed to combat invasive species, Germany strongly believes that there needs to be more policies and strategies to thoroughly erase this threat to the environment, especially in three areas. First, Germany believes that enhancing international biosecurity protocols to prevent the unintentional spread of invasive species will be vital to solving this issue. Next, members of the IUCN should expand early detection systems. This can include establishing a global invasive species database. Finally, Germany encourages all members to contain habitat restoration programs and biological control methods to mitigate damage caused by invasive species.
Germany remains committed to global cooperation in addressing invasive species and urges the IUCN to take action.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). “Global Strategy on Invasive Species.”
European Commission (2015). “EU Regulation on Invasive Alien Species.”
Federal Ministry for the Environment (2022). “Germany’s National Biodiversity Strategy.”
IPBES (2019). “The Economic Cost of Invasive Species.”
IUCN (2023). “The Role of IUCN in Combatting Invasive Species.”
LIFE+ Programme (2021). “EU Actions Against Invasive Species.”

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Turkey
Delegate Name: Annabelle Peters

Committee: IUCN
Topic: Regulation of Invasive Species
Country: Türkiye
School: The Ellis School

The regulation of invasive species is a crucial environmental and economic issue affecting ecosystems worldwide. Invasive alien species (IAS) are non-native organisms introduced to new environments, either intentionally or accidentally, where they disrupt native biodiversity, alter habitats, and cause economic damage. These species can spread rapidly due to a lack of natural predators or competition, often outcompeting native flora and fauna. Common pathways for IAS introduction include global trade, transportation, agriculture, and climate change-driven habitat shifts. Regulation of invasive species takes place in various ecosystems, including forests, freshwater and marine environments, agricultural lands, and urban areas. The issue involves multiple stakeholders, including national governments, international organizations, environmental NGOs, industries such as agriculture and fisheries, and local communities. Millions of people worldwide are affected, as IAS can threaten food security, damage infrastructure, reduce agricultural productivity, and harm commercial fisheries. Economically, IAS causes billions of dollars in damage annually, with direct impacts on industries such as forestry, farming, and tourism. Regulating IAS is vital because their spread threatens global biodiversity, disrupts food chains, and causes irreversible ecological damage. Additionally, invasive species can serve as vectors for diseases, increasing public health risks. Without proper regulation, invasive species can lead to the extinction of native species, the collapse of ecosystems, and severe economic losses. Effective IAS regulation requires comprehensive strategies that include prevention, early detection, rapid response, control, and long-term monitoring.

The United Nations and other international bodies have recognized invasive species as a significant global threat. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) addresses IAS under Article 8(h), calling on countries to “prevent the introduction of, control, or eradicate alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species.” Additionally, Aichi Biodiversity Target 9 emphasizes the need for countries to identify and manage IAS to minimize their impact. UN officials have highlighted the urgency of addressing IAS. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has stated that invasive species “pose one of the greatest threats to biodiversity and ecosystem stability” and has called for increased international cooperation to mitigate their spread. The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has estimated that IAS are responsible for 60% of global species extinctions. Several key international agreements address the regulation of invasive species, including The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), and The Ballast Water Management Convention. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands includes measures to prevent invasive species from degrading wetland ecosystems. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) establishes standards for preventing the spread of invasive pests in agriculture and forestry. The Ballast Water Management Convention regulates how ships discharge ballast water to prevent the introduction of invasive marine species. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) work to research, advocate for policy changes, and assist governments in developing IAS management strategies. Despite these efforts, many countries still struggle with enforcement, funding, and coordination in combating invasive species. Effective international regulation remains a challenge, requiring stronger global cooperation and stricter biosecurity measures.

Türkiye faces a growing problem with IAS, particularly in marine and freshwater ecosystems. The Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry has identified species such as the lionfish (Pterois miles) in the Mediterranean and the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in freshwater habitats as harmful to native biodiversity. Over 450 IAS have been reported along Türkiye’s coastline, affecting fisheries and tourism. The Turkish government has adopted a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, aligned with EU regulations, to regulate and manage IAS. The country has also implemented projects such as the “Addressing Invasive Alien Species Threats in Terrestrial Areas and Inland Waters” initiative to strengthen monitoring, legal frameworks, and public awareness. Türkiye supports stronger UN policies promoting coordinated global action, financial assistance for affected countries, and stricter regulations on the international trade of potential IAS.

Türkiye proposes a multi-faceted approach to IAS management, focusing on prevention, rapid response, and long-term control.
Plan A: Prevention and Early Detection System
1. Establish an Invasive Species Monitoring Network (ISMN): A real-time national database to track IAS presence and movement in Türkiye’s ecosystems. This will involve collaboration between government agencies, universities, and environmental organizations.
2. Strengthen Border and Trade Controls: Implement stricter regulations on imports of live plants, animals, and shipping ballast water to prevent unintentional IAS introductions.
3. Develop an IAS Risk Assessment System: Before approving imports of foreign species, conduct ecological risk assessments to evaluate potential environmental threats.

Plan B: Rapid Response and Eradication Measures
1. Create a National Rapid Response Task Force: A specialized team responsible for immediate action against newly identified IAS, including containment and removal programs.
2. Pilot Eradication Programs in High-Risk Areas: Implement removal campaigns targeting high-impact species such as lionfish in the Mediterranean and water hyacinth in freshwater systems.
3. Use Biological Control Agents: Develop and introduce natural predators or biocontrol methods where safe and scientifically justified to manage IAS populations.

Plan C: Long-Term Management and Public Engagement
1. Build More Sewage Treatment Facilities: Many invasive aquatic species thrive in polluted waters where native species struggle to survive. Improving water quality will help native species outcompete invasive ones.
2. Develop Public Awareness and Education Campaigns: Engage local communities, farmers, and fishermen in IAS reporting and control efforts through workshops, media campaigns, and citizen science initiatives.
3. Encourage Sustainable Fishing Practices: Incentivize the fishing industry to harvest invasive species such as lionfish for commercial use, turning an environmental problem into an economic opportunity.

These plans will work by combining prevention, control, and public participation to ensure a comprehensive, long-term strategy for IAS management in Türkiye. Türkiye urges the UN to support the development of regional cooperation mechanisms, increased funding for IAS research, and enhanced trade regulations to mitigate the risks posed by invasive species.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Mongolia
Delegate Name: Bela Haight

The negative impact that invasive species has had over the years across the world are devastating, and change must be made before the damage caused by this global problem becomes irreversible. Not only do these invasive species negatively impact the flora and fauna of a country, but these negative effects quickly begin to impact human life. According to the US Department of Agriculture, invasive species have cost us up to 1.288 trillion dollars globally in just the past 50 years, and this number is rapidly increasing.

Invasive species are known for their impact in the lives of native species in an area, and oftentimes lead to habitat and resource depletion for native species. This leads to decreased biodiversity, impacts on outdoor recreation, the tourism industry, and even industries such as fishing. The effort to decrease the spread of invasive species has been a case of too little too late, and had led to money lost across the world. As a society, it is crucial that we finally explore more ideas that will really be effective in the stopping of invasive species.

In Mongolia, one of the most invasive species is the Staghorn Sumac, originating from North America, competing with native parts of the ecosystem and aggressively attacking grasslands and taking over important ecosystems. It is necessary that we create an association that will attack this problem aggressively on a national level, eradicating invasive species for good.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Haiti
Delegate Name: Nathaniel Calabio

Committee: IUCN
Topic: Regulating Invasive Species
Country: The Republic of Haiti
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Invasive species have the potential to cause irreversible damage to dozens of countries, irreparably harming biodiversity and endangering hundreds of environments around the globe. Alien plant species have been shown to negatively impact both native plants and animals (Vila et al. 2011). One way to treat the damage caused by harmful alien species is through eradication (Holmes et al. 2019). The country of Haiti has been victimized by invasive species for multiple decades, causing multitudes of problems for the country (Coolman 2016).

Invasive plant species have been reported to significantly reduce native plant species’ growth, abundance, and diversity, as well as decrease native animal species’ fitness and abundance (Vila et al. 2011). They have also been responsible for 423 billion dollars in damages globally (Dickie 2023). By not implementing sufficient methods of stopping invasive species, they severely damage global biodiversity, which can lead to ecological collapse.

A promising way of dealing with invasive species is through eradication. By selecting certain islands containing endangered species threatened by alien species and eradicating the alien species, the native species was able to recover. Unfortunately, this method costs a fortune and requires significant political support to be able to function properly (Holmes et al. 2019). As of now, wide-scale efforts to control invasive species are expensive, but with the assistance of the committee, the delegation of Haiti believes that the spread of alien species can be controlled.

The country of Haiti has been a victim of alien species for multiple decades. One of these species is the small Indian Mongoose, and it is believed by many to carry rabies (Coolman 2016). While the likelihood of a mongoose carrying rabies is low (Browne et al. 2021), the threat of invasive species carrying disease and spreading it through the populace is a very real possibility, one that could be prevented through the control of invasive species.

References:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212128&type=printable

https://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ae91d2ea-06e6-4d4b-8e42-6a3415c0961a/content

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/09/invasive-species-cost-global-economy-billions/#:~:text=Invasive%20species%20cost%20the%20world%20%24423%20billion%20every%20year&text=They%20play%20a%20key%20role,invasive%20species%2C%20according%20to%20scientists.

https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009536

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Pakistan
Delegate Name: Michael Fuger

Invasive species are very harmful to global biodiversity. They spread disease, compete with native species, and destroy ecosystems. According to the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), invasive species are a major factor in 60% of global animal and plant extinctions. Also according to the IPBES, invasive species cost the world over 423 billion US dollars each year. Many invasive species are spread unintentionally because of humans. A large number of species are spread through air travel and many aquatic species on ships.

Pakistan is heavily affected by many invasive species, especially by invasive plants. Some of the worst invasive animals include carp and tilapia. Parthenium weeds have already spread rapidly throughout southern Pakistan and many researchers believe that it may begin to spread to the rest of the country. Parthenium weeds are known to be dangerous to humans and biodiversity and are destroying agricultural areas in the country. Pakistan has signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

The CITES treaty protects over 40,000 species that are traded across borders. It provides a framework for countries to regulate trade and protect native species. Pakistan supports this framework and signed the treaty in 1976. Pakistan believes that more research on invasive species should be performed.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Panama
Delegate Name: Sophia Plencner

Position Paper: Regulating Invasive Species

Country: The Republic of Panama

Committee: International Union for Conservation of Nature

Topic: Regulating Invasive Species

By: Sophia Plencner

Introduction:

The increase of invasive species in Panama’s wildlife zones is a dangerous and often persistent threat that plagues far more vulnerable native species than it needs to. As a nation committed to protecting our citizens, we have been tirelessly fighting the prevalence of alien and exotic species in our country. This position paper details Panama’s concerns, positions, and possible solutions to solve the increased amount of invasive species in our regions.

Panama’s Perspective:

Panama understands the risk of invasive species and its effects. Invasive species are one of the leading causes of harm to the environment and wildlife. Panama is particularly concerned about the following issues:

Biodiversity being threatened: The increase of invasive species in our country deepens the loss of biodiversity within our borders, a topic we are very concerned about.
Degrading habitats and loss of soils: Loss of native plants or an influx of invasive species can lead to loss of what little habitats that there are in specific areas of Panama, often leading to more disputes between species and certain wildlife trying to inhibit land that isn’t theirs.
Increase of wildfire risk and other natural disasters: The overall loss of wildlife or species that protected certain areas means that many places will be left vulnerable to wildfires. The new inhabitants will not be established enough to provide sufficient protection, often leading toward areas being much more prone to burning.

Panama’s Policy Positions:

Panama regards a multiparty republic with one legislative house to approach and tackle the effects of invasive species within our country. The Key policy positions include:
Reducing percentages of invasive species: Panama is dedicated to lowering the amount of species who are alien, non-native, and harmful to our country.
Strengthening our approaches: Panama is determined to reevaluate and strengthen our approaches to lessening the amount of invasive species that enter our country.
Bringing awareness: Panama is aware and determined to bring awareness to problems within our country, and that it is the first step to addressing situations and overcoming obstacles.
Lessening opportunities for invasive species to enter our country: Panama understands the risk of invasive species entering our country through our canal, and is committed to working on ways to lessen opportunities to do so.

Proposed Solutions:
To tackle the effects of invasive species in our country, Panama proposes the following solutions:
Relocate invasive species: Take invasive species back to their native habitats for a clean slate.
Establish native species: Aid and support already established and native species in our country so that they are less likely to be overrun by invasive ones.
Clean ships that enter our canal: Make sure to clean bottoms of ships to make sure that no species can accidentally enter new habitats.
Increase awareness: Make citizens and visitors aware of the effects and types of invasive species to make sure that they don’t accidentally harm our habitats.
Conclusion:
Panama is committed to lessening the amount of invasive species in and out of our country. By working together, we can not only address situations such as depleting habitats and native species within our borders, but also help to make sure visitors do so as well.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Philippines
Delegate Name: Bryan Oh

The Philippines increasingly faces significant challenges with invasive species. Non-native
species damage the country’s biodiversity and affect the economy, severely impacting local
ecosystems and economic development. The Philippines contains approximately 150,000
species, with at least 700 species that are endangered, making it one of the most biodiverse
countries in the world and one of the world’s top priorities for conservation efforts. In response
to this, the Philippines believes that a global monitoring system is needed to control the spread of
invasive species.
Recent legislative efforts, including the Philippine Biodiversity Act and the Wildlife Resources
Conservation and Protection Act, have been implemented to manage the spread of invasive
species. The Philippines is also a participant in the National Invasive Species Strategy and
Action Plan (NISSAP), which is intended to prevent the introduction and spread of these harmful
species. These laws specifically prohibit invasive species within protected and critical habitats by
enforcing strict entry controls and trading regulations. Moreover, these laws support the
eradication of existing invasive species through physical removal and biological control.
However, the rise in food importation has caused an increased entry of invasive species into the
country. Among the invasive species that have affected the Philippines are Ipil-Ipil from the
Tropical Americas, which outcompetes native vegetation, and the Golden Apple Snail, which has
spread into forest areas; this has damaged the economic potential of rice growing, one of the
Philippines’ main economic functions, by 12.5-17.8 million dollars. Invasive species have
decreased biodiversity and disrupted native ecosystems, making it difficult for other species to
survive.
The effects of invasive species extend beyond ecological damage, which could lead to the
extinction of indigenous wildlife, destruction of biodiversity, and a reduction of wildlife habitats.
This is concerning for the Philippines, a maritime country that relies on trading and agriculture.
Agriculture contributes 9.4% of the nation’s GDP and is at risk as invasive species continue to
damage ecosystems and agricultural resources. This threat is not unique to the Philippines; other
biodiverse, developing countries rely on agriculture as a major source of GDP and are also facing
the harmful effects of invasive species. This is why regulating invasive species is important, as
their spread can cause economic instability.
The Philippines recognizes the growing threat of invasive species to all countries’ environments
and ecosystems. One possible solution to this is the creation of an international monitoring and
reporting system. Although some monitoring systems already exist, the UN doesn’t have a
centralized one, which could enhance these efforts by establishing a global network to track
invasive species. This system would collect and share data on invasive species, their spread, and
ecological and environmental effects. This warning system would prevent the further spread of
invasive species by alerting countries to take immediate action. Furthermore, many of the
countries most at risk, specifically developing countries with limited resources for monitoring,
struggle to combat invasive species effectively. In response to this, the Philippines would
strongly support increased funding to help developing countries combat invasive species once
detected.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Russian Federation
Delegate Name: Amelia Wigant

Invasive species, often considered one of the leading drivers of biodiversity loss and ecological damage worldwide, pose significant environmental, economic, and social threats. These non-native species can disrupt ecosystems, outcompete indigenous flora and fauna, and lead to long-term ecological and agricultural damage. While the issue of invasive species has gained increasing global attention, nations differ in their approaches to managing and regulating their spread. Russia, with its vast territory spanning diverse ecosystems and climatic regions, has a unique perspective on the regulation of invasive species. This paper outlines Russia’s stance on invasive species management, focusing on its existing policies, challenges, and the implications for international cooperation.
Russia spans over 17 million square kilometers, encompassing a wide range of ecological zones from Arctic tundra to temperate forests and vast steppes. The Russian Federation is home to many of the world’s most significant ecosystems, such as the Siberian taiga and the steppes of southern Russia, which are crucial for maintaining global biodiversity. Additionally, Russia’s agricultural and forest industries are integral to its economy, relying on healthy ecosystems for resource extraction, crop production, and wildlife conservation.

Although, Russia also faces increasing pressure from the introduction of invasive species, particularly in regions where human activity intersects with vulnerable ecosystems. This has led to growing concerns over the economic and ecological impacts of invasive species on Russian agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and biodiversity.

Russia’s approach to invasive species management is somewhat fragmented, as the issue intersects with various governmental agencies and ministries. The primary regulatory body addressing invasive species in Russia is the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, which is tasked with overseeing the implementation of Russia’s environmental protection policies. The 2014 “Federal Law on Environmental Protection” provides a broad framework for regulating the introduction and management of invasive species. The law highlights the need to prevent the spread of non-native species that pose a threat to the environment, agriculture, and public health.

Additionally, Russia has a system of “Sanitary and Epidemiological Supervision” to address the introduction of invasive species that may pose a threat to human health. This system is primarily focused on controlling the spread of diseases and pests but also serves as a preventive mechanism for dealing with invasive species. However, the coordination between environmental, health, and agricultural bodies remains inconsistent, making effective management difficult.

Invasive species are a significant concern for Russia’s agricultural sector. Certain invasive pests, such as the cabbage root fly and the pine shoot beetle, have had a profound impact on crop yields and forest health. The introduction of alien plant species like the Japanese knotweed and the common ragweed has also disrupted native ecosystems, causing economic losses in forestry and agriculture.

To address these issues, Russia has begun implementing control measures, including the use of herbicides, pesticides, and physical removal, alongside biological control programs. However, the effectiveness of these measures is debated, and many regions struggle with insufficient resources and expertise to combat invasive species effectively.

Biodiversity Conservation: Russia’s rich biodiversity faces considerable threats from invasive species. Native wildlife, such as the Siberian tiger, Russian brown bear, and several species of freshwater fish, are particularly vulnerable to the introduction of non-native predators, diseases, and competitors. For example, the spread of invasive fish species like the perch and carp has led to competition with native fish and altered aquatic ecosystems.

Russia’s approach to biodiversity conservation is guided by its commitment to international agreements, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). However, the enforcement of biodiversity protection laws remains inconsistent, with inadequate monitoring systems and limited data on the distribution and impact of invasive species.

Given its large landmass and ecological diversity, Russia recognizes the importance of international cooperation in addressing the challenges posed by invasive species. However, Russia’s approach to international collaboration in this regard is influenced by both geopolitical and economic factors.

Russia participates in international environmental organizations, including the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the CBD, which provide forums for the discussion and regulation of invasive species. Russia’s delegation has expressed support for strengthening global efforts to prevent the spread of invasive species through collaborative monitoring, early-warning systems, and the sharing of best practices.

As a major global power and trading nation, Russia is concerned with the role that international trade plays in facilitating the spread of invasive species. While Russia has implemented strict border control measures, including quarantine inspections and the regulation of imported goods, the challenge of balancing free trade with environmental protection remains a point of tension. Russia has called for stricter international standards for regulating the movement of goods that could harbor invasive species, particularly in sectors like agriculture, forestry, and shipping.

Russia’s approach to invasive species management is also shaped by its geopolitical interests. In some cases, Russia has been cautious about endorsing certain international frameworks or agreements that it perceives as limiting its sovereignty or economic freedom. For example, Russia’s reluctance to fully embrace the European Union’s invasive species regulations has been attributed to concerns about trade restrictions and regulatory burdens on domestic industries.

Russia recognizes the severe ecological and economic threats posed by invasive species and has taken steps toward developing a framework to address the issue. However, the complexity of managing invasive species across such a vast and ecologically diverse territory presents considerable challenges. While Russia supports international cooperation on invasive species management, its geopolitical and economic concerns often influence the extent to which it engages with global frameworks. To enhance the effectiveness of invasive species regulation, Russia may need to focus on improving inter-agency collaboration, increasing public awareness, and strengthening its commitment to international environmental agreements. Furthermore, as the global movement of goods and people continues to increase, Russia’s role in shaping international policies for invasive species management will remain crucial in the fight to protect global biodiversity.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Ukraine
Delegate Name: Gavin O’Meara

Committee: IUCN
Topic: Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Ukraine
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Invasive species have long plagued the world as a whole, dating back to even the 15th century and the exchange of animals and plants from Europe to America. Invasive species present danger when they outcompete local wildlife to the point of driving that local species to extinction. To avoid the detrimental effects of invasive species, the UN has made efforts to raise awareness of these invasive species, such as in the Invasive Alien Species Report. In it, scientists explain that invasive species have accounted for $423 billion globally, and every decade the cost of the damage has quadrupled (UNEP 2023). The current rate that this cost is rising in unsustainable and must be stopped.
Ukraine is currently facing difficulties in handling the spread of invasive species due to the costly war with the Russian Federation. As a result of the Russian Invasion, Ukraine is unable to protect against invasive species as it’s nearly impossible to prevent an invading force from spreading wildlife (Pashkevich 2023). If no serious action is taken to combat the spread of invasive species, Ukraine will face serious consequences even long after the conflict with Russia is over.
Ukraine is in dire need of additional aid against the spread of invasive species. Ukraine desires a resolution that strengthens aid of wildlife preservation in conflict zones and to countries defending their territory. Ukraine is in favor of upholding current invasive species legislation but wishes for additional protection for wildlife from either the UN or other third-party organizations.

References
Environment Programme, U. N. (2023, August 29). Invasive alien species report. UNEP – UN Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/invasive-alien-species-report
Nataliia Pashkevich. (2023, January 11). Invasive species threat resulting from Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine – Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group. Ukraine War Environmental Consequences Work Group – Seeking Solutions through Information Sharing about the Environmental Impacts of the War. UWEC Work Group. https://uwecworkgroup.info/invasive-species-threat-resulting-from-russias-full-scale-invasion-of-ukraine/

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Bolivia
Delegate Name: Avery Phillips

The estimated damage from invasive species around the world is more than $1.4 trillion. Looking at this issue from strictly an economic position it is devastating for the economy worldwide, and if something drastic does not change that number is expected to increase. Let alone the disastrous effect it poses on our Earth, species, food sources, safety and more. In Bolivia a fish called the paiche fish was accidentally introduced after a flood. This species has been a boon to the economy, in some more rural places accounting for up to 70% of fishermen’s catches. It has also caused native fish species to disappear in areas where the paiche thrive. The Bolivian government has taken action and rather than eradicating it completely, has started controlling its numbers. In 2017 at the request of INIAF, FAUNAGUA created a baseline knowledge about paiche in Bolivia and conducted training for fishermen in the Manuripi. In 2018 a resolution with the objective of regulating paiche fishing and controlling its expansion was promulgated and FAUNAGUA elaborated a strategy for the control and use of paiche. In 2019 FAUNAGUA created the first Paiche Control Plan for the Manuripi NWR and was approved by SERNAP. From just this example it is evident that the Republic of Bolivia is extremely invested in protecting biodiversity, the economy and ecosystems and wants to find solutions for the prevention of invasive species worldwide. The IUCN should help develop early detection and rapid response systems and protocols, in partnership with national governments. Acting fast can be the key to minimizing the spread of invasive species. Countries also need to commit to the rehabilitation of ecosystems and focus on removing invasive species, fostering and reintroducing indigenous species. They also need to focus on not only checking products or vehicles entering their country but ones leaving it as well. Pressure should be applied for all countries to adhere to this for the benefit of the world. The IUCN can also work together with countries to help spread public awareness and create public education campaigns about reducing the spread of invasive species and the risks they pose. This can help reduce the potential of accidental introductions and help minimize the spread of invasive species. The IUCN must work together to create effective policies and help restore biodiversity to ecosystems. Augmenting global cooperation to really make a change.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: South Africa
Delegate Name: Quynh Song

Committee: IUCN
Topic: Regulating Invasive Species
Country Represented: South Africa
Delegate: Quynh Song
School: Greenhills School
Invasive species cost the global economy at least $423 billion annually. Alien species have increasingly invaded worldwide ecosystems, harming indigenous plants and animals. Around 200 new alien species are recorded every year, and the projected increase is alarmingly 36% by 2050. However, the United Nations has taken significant steps in tackling this issue through agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity and initiatives like the Global Invasive Species Program in 1997 which aim to promote the conservation of biodiversity. Both addressed pressured biodiversity and encouraged international cooperation to protect their ecosystems through new policies. However, the IUCN needs to continue regulating these harmful invasive species.
South Africa has implemented multiple strategies to combat this issue, recognizing their significance in threatening biodiversity and human livelihood. In 2014, the nation adopted the “National Strategy for Dealing with Biological Invasions,” which outlines a comprehensive approach to managing this issue. Moreover, the National Environmental Biodiversity Act (2004) enacted prohibitions, regulations of existing wildlife, and border control of invasive species. Additionally, South Africa holds a National Invasive Species Week under the Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment (DFFE) annually to raise awareness to the general public, stimulate management plans, and work with other sectors to strengthen efforts. Furthermore, there are regional and continental initiatives such as the African Union’s Strategy for Managing Invasive Species in Africa contributes to a wide range approach similar to the Southern African Development Community.
The IUCN must prioritize tackling invasive alien organisms and their impacts to global biodiversity. South Africa is eager to collaborate with many to solve this pressing issue. It has multiple proposals for resolutions on the topic of invasive species such as focusing on combating invasive species, including pushing for cooperation to build up cross-border policies, promoting the restoration of native groups in ecosystems affected, and through the importance of Early Detection and Rapid Response to prevent further spread. Public engagement and community involvement plays a critical role, recognizing that local communities are key to regional success. By raising awareness and empowering citizens to take action through new programs influenced by best practices, the country believes that more sustainable and long-lasting solutions can be achieved. The South African delegation firmly believes that with these proposed resolutions, the IUCN can restore biodiversity, conserve vulnerable native organisms, and foster a global effort to shelter ecosystems from invasive alien species.

Works Cited:
https://www.cbd.int/invasive/doc/legislation/south-africa.pdf
https://www.gisp.org/
https://iucn.org/our-work/topic/invasive-alien-species#:~:text=Regulating%20the%20trade%20and%20movement,detection%2C%20monitoring%20and%20rapid%20eradication

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Ghana
Delegate Name: Evan Gagliardo

Committee: International Union for Conservation of Nature
Topic: Invasive species
Country: Ghana
School: Forest Hills Central

An “invasive species” is a species that is: 1) non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and, 2) whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health. Overall, the numbers of invasive species were predicted to increase globally by 36 percent from 2005 to 2050. Invasive species are present on all 7 continents and affect every country including Ghana. These species can negatively impact human health by infecting humans with new diseases, serving as vectors for existing diseases, or causing wounds through bites, stings, allergens, or other toxins (National Invasive Species Information Center). These same species can also cause costly economic and ecological damage each year including crop decimation, clogging of water facilities and waterways, wildlife and human disease transmission, threats to fisheries, increased fire vulnerability, and adverse effects on ranchers and farmers. Invasive species are growing due to international trade and human mobility, exacerbated by the impacts of climate change, which have increased the introduction of plant and animal species into new areas where they have become invasive.
The UN has made many considerable efforts to curb the spread of invasive species, such as The Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) which has three main objectives: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of the components of biological diversity, and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources. Next the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) calls on its parties to ‘prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species. The International Plant Protection Convention (1997) is an intergovernmental treaty signed by over 180 countries, aiming to protect the world’s plant resources from the spread and introduction of pests and promote safe trade (FAO, 1999). The Convention introduced the International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (FAO, 2021) as its main tool to achieve its goals, making it the sole global standard-setting organization for plant health. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) is one of the ‘Three Sisters’ recognized by the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Agreement (WTO, 1998), along with the Codex Alimentarius Commission for food safety standards and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) for animal health standards.
In Ghana, 221 invasive species examples include pink hibiscus, mealy bug, and armyworm. These pests and the diseases they bring, cause food and agriculture-related losses valued at USD 1 billion annually, and they account for about a 90% reduction in the original stretch of the country’s tropical forest, which impacts the economy and the livelihoods of smallholder farmers, dragging these farmers into poverty. Climate change makes the challenge harder to address as warmer temperatures attract more invasive species. So, 11 public and private sector organizations collaboratively developed an Early Warning and Rapid Response System for Pests and Diseases to protect the country’s food system. Challenges faced by Ghana include limited resources/funding, cross-border challenges, and the threat of climate change, which only exacerbates the invasive species crisis. Key points about Ghana’s efforts against invasive species include collaboration with CABI. Ghana has worked closely with the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) to develop response plans and build expertise in managing invasive alien pests.
Another key point is the NISSAP agreement which involves various government agencies, research institutions, and stakeholders to coordinate efforts against invasive species. The final point in this plan is the Early Warning and Rapid Response System, which puts initiatives in place to detect and quickly respond to new invasive species threats, especially in the agricultural sector. It also focuses on making efforts to educate and equip both government officials and local farmers, with the knowledge and skills necessary to manage invasive species.
Ghana believes that invasive species are a global issue and must be addressed as such but each country’s unique needs should be addressed. Ghana recognizes that different countries have different approaches – two of note are the Invasive Species Definition Clarification and Guidance prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA, 2006) and the Australian Weed Strategy (Australian Government, 2016). Although the needs of countries are different as previously stated, Ghana strongly suggests that all countries work together to stop the spread of invasive species and believes that this is the best approach, because invasive species are spread mainly through cross-border travel. Ghana believes the best way to balance both global and regional approaches includes ideas such as national efforts that should include early warning systems, eradication, and control, as well as increased awareness and political leadership. Ghana believes, that global, regional, and bilateral efforts should include standards and guidelines, monitoring and assessment, and information and action networks (FAO, 2007). Ghana strongly suggests that all countries work together to stop the spread of invasive species and believes that this is the best approach because invasive species are spread mainly through cross-border travel. Ghana strongly urges organizations such as UNEP to work with them and others, to implement and fund a plan(s) that benefit every country involved, no matter the GDP so they can work together and work toward eradicating invasive species.

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Nigeria
Delegate Name: Kamryn Khan

Kamryn Khan
IUCN
Nigeria
Regulation of Invasive Species
2/12/2025

As one of the most biodiverse countries in Africa, Nigeria recognizes the urgent need to preserve our native ecosystems and address the threats posed by invasive species. These species can harm biodiversity, agriculture, and human health, highlighting the need for effective regulatory frameworks. This position paper outlines Nigeria’s stance on the regulation of invasive species, their types, associated problems, and current efforts to address these challenges.

Nigeria advocates for stringent regulatory measures to control the introduction and spread of invasive species. Comprehensive policies should be implemented to assess risks, manage existing populations, and prevent future invasions.

The types of invasive species affecting Nigeria include:
1. Aquatic Invasive Species:
– Water Hyacinth(Eichhornia crassipes): Forms dense mats on water surfaces, blocking sunlight and choking out native plants.
– Nile Tilapia(Oreochromis niloticus): Competes with local fish for food and space, disrupting local ecosystems.

2. Terrestrial Invasive Species:
– Lantana Camara: Aggressively dominates landscapes, choking out native flora and altering habitats.
– Giant Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum): Suppresses native plant growth, reducing biodiversity and affecting soil chemistry.

3. Invasive Insects:
– Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda): Affects key crops like maize and rice, leading to significant agricultural losses and threatening food security.

Negative impacts of invasive species include:
– Biodiversity Loss: Threatens local ecosystems and outcompetes native species, potentially leading to declines or extinctions.
– Agricultural Damage: Reduces crop yields and quality, increasing costs for farmers and jeopardizing food security.
– Economic Burden: Significant costs for control measures and diminished productivity in agriculture and fisheries, threatening local economies.

Historically, Nigeria has managed invasive species through:
– Legislative Frameworks: The National Environmental (Biodiversity Conservation) Regulation includes provisions for invasive species management.
– Awareness Campaigns: Initiatives to educate communities on the risks of invasive species.

Current efforts include:
– Research Initiatives: Collaborating with universities and NGOs to study invasive species impacts and effective management strategies.
– Monitoring Programs: Tracking the distribution of invasive species to evaluate management effectiveness.

To strengthen regulation, Nigeria proposes:
1. Development of a National Invasive Species Strategy: A plan focused on research, monitoring, and community involvement.
2. Enhanced Legal Frameworks: Specific regulations to manage and control invasive species, empowering authorities for enforcement.
3. Capacity Building and Training: Training local authorities to improve their skills in monitoring and managing invasive species.

Nigeria aims to collaborate with the United Nations on:

– Global Conferences: Sharing strategies for invasive species management.
– Aligning with UN SDGs: Working towards SDG 15 to combat land degradation and biodiversity loss.
– Collaborative Research Projects: Engaging in partnerships for knowledge sharing and research related to invasive species.

Nigeria is committed to addressing the challenges posed by invasive species through comprehensive regulation and collaborative efforts. By implementing targeted strategies and strengthening legal frameworks, we will protect our biodiversity and ensure sustainable development. We urge the IUCN and member states to support the regulation of invasive species as a vital component of global biodiversity conservation efforts.

References
– National Biodiversity Policy of Nigeria
– National Environmental (Biodiversity Conservation) Regulation
– Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

Works Cited
https://conbio.org/groups/sections/africa/act/management-of-invasive-species-in-nigeria

https://www.nesrea.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Control_of_Alien_and_Invasive_Species.pdf

file:///C:/Users/27kha/Downloads/ajol-file-journals_719_articles_275136_66a77fd1a94ca.pdf

Topic: 2025-Regulating Invasive Species
Country: Denmark
Delegate Name: Amari Carthron

Amari Carthron

Denmark

IUCN

Regulating Invasive Species

Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

Non-native species are a common aspect of many different ecosystems. Most of these species do not cause any harm to the biodiversity or stability of the already existing ecosystem that they become a part of. However, some of these species do eventually become harmful to their new environments and the native species that were originally a part of them. Invasive species are defined as species which become established in a natural or semi natural ecosystem, are an agent of change, and threaten biological diversity. They out-compete native species and cause a decrease in biodiversity which leads to more unstable ecosystems. Invasive grasses can make wildfires more common, while invasive aquatic species can make waterways untraversable, block commercial infrastructure, overtake lakes, and destroy fisheries.
Much of the invasive species of the world spread through human travel and trade. The country of Denmark has been no stranger to this issue. Denmark has reported 2,600 non-native species that are currently within the country, 77 of these species are invasive. Denmark has also reported 85 alien marine species, 4 of which are invasive. 2 of the 4 invasive species were introduced via ballast water 10 to 15 years ago. Aquatic invasive species in particular have been a huge problem in Denmark due to a lack of monitoring methods for them. Aquatic invasive species are usually reported by individuals or discovered via individual studies. There have been few centralized monitoring efforts and this has allowed aquatic invasive species, such as the Round Goby, to spread and cause an unknown amount of damage.
In order to combat this issue, a solution involving underwater robots has been developed. One of these underwater robots, the EPS (Environmental Sample Processor), was first developed in the US and it has been brought to Denmark as a method of data collection for invasive species. Along with this, the European Union has been working to combat the issue via an eradication order of over a dozen invasive species in Denmark in 2016. These species are illegal to buy or sell, but people are permitted to keep them if they are already in their possession as long as they prevent them from reproducing. Further research on and development of these robots is necessary to make them a viable solution and prepare them for widespread use. A strengthening of enforcement of the eradication order through fines or other penalties is also necessary to help control invasive species in Denmark.

Works Cited

Krull L. “Invasive species threaten marine biodiversity.” DTU, 13 Dec. 2023, https://www.dtu.dk/english/newsarchive/2023/12/invasive-species

Wenande C. “EU condemns a dozen invasive species in Denmark.” The Copenhagen Post, 3 Aug. 2016,
https://cphpost.dk/2016-08-03/news/eu-condemns-a-dozen-invasive-species-in-denmark/

Position papers for SIMUN 2025 will appear above this line, with the newest being at the top.