No First Use Policies & Nuclear Disarmament

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Colombia
Delegate Name: Gwyneth Henry

The Republic of Colombia views the threat of nuclear weapons as one of the largest threats to human safety. As a Latin American nation bound to the Treaty of Tlatelolco, Columbia is part of a region fully committed to remaining nuclear weapon free. Nuclear disarmament has aligned with Colombia’s goals for safety for many years. Colombia strongly supports global disarmament efforts and policies that reduce the likelihood of nuclear conflict, including the adoption of No First Use(NFU) pledges by nuclear armed states. The issue of NFU is important to Colombia because even if nuclear conflict is happening far from Latin America, it will have a severe global impact. All countries will feel the consequences whether they are environmental, economic or humanitarian. With tensions rising between countries that are nuclearly armed, Colombia believes that (NFU) is a necessary step to reduce the threat of nuclear war.
In trying to stop nuclear conflicts, Colombia has taken part in multiple agreements and treaties on the matter. As a long time member of the Treaty of Tlatelolco and supporter of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons(TPNW), Colombia consistently has and will continue to advocate for reducing the role of nuclear weapons in global security. Colombia has upheld all obligations under the Treaty of Tlatelolco, which prohibits nuclear weapons in Latin America. NFU policy aligns perfectly with Colombia’s larger goals of reducing nuclear weapons in world affairs.
Although Colombia is not involved in a nuclear standoff, conflict with these weapons anywhere in the world would affect the nation. A nuclear exchange would harm the world market, trade exchanges, and would wreck the environment which could reach Latin America.
One of the ways Colombia’s economy benefits is through their exports to other countries. If something nuclear were to happen then Colombia’s economy would begin to plummet because of their reliance on exports.
Colombia recognizes the positive steps that have been taken to solve this issue around the world, and supports ongoing efforts to make more of these policies and treaties. Colombia supports building off of treaties like New START to promote transparency with nuclear weapons, and limiting the number a country can have. Colombia also recommends expanding nuclear weapon free zones, which could resemble Latin America’s success with creating these zones in the past. Colombia also encourages nuclear armed countries to take into consideration what the NFU policies state, and adopt these policies if they align with their beliefs.
The Republic of Colombia believes that No First Use policies can reduce the threat of nuclear conflict significantly, and promote global stability. The NFU policy will not eliminate nuclear weapons, but it will build trust between these armed countries and reduce risk of conflicts between them. Colombia is committed to supporting peaceful solutions, and working with nations that share the same goals of advancing towards a safer international environment.

Works cited
Treaty of Tlatelolco | United Nations Platform for Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones. (n.d.). https://www.un.org/nwfz/content/treaty-tlatelolco#:~:text=The%20Treaty%20of%20Tlatelolco%2C%20also%20known%20as,33%20Latin%20America%20and%20the%20Caribbean%20countries
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons | United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (n.d.). https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons
New START Treaty – United States Department of State. (2025, September 19). United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/new-start-treaty
William Paul McGreevey, and Robert Louis Gilmore. “Colombia | History, Culture, & Facts.” Encyclopædia Britannica, 30 Apr. 2019, www.britannica.com/place/Colombia.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Peru
Delegate Name: Minhao Chen

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Republic of Peru
Minhao Chen
Forest Hills Northern

From the inception of nuclear weapons, the threat of nuclear armageddon has been a notable issue globally. The indiscriminate nature of nuclear weapons is what makes them an insidious threat to global security and the safety of all nations. As such, many measures have been taken in order to prevent such an event from occurring, such as “No First Use” policies, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which aim to prevent initiation of nuclear warfare, prevent transfer of nuclear weapons, and prohibit nuclear weapons altogether, respectively. However, despite these measures being taken into place, the threat of nuclear warfare still remains. The challenge of adopting “No First Use” is that it requires a significant amount of trust in other nations which currently isn’t present, since the declaration of “No First Use” would allow for other nations to strike first. The benefit of the “No First Use” policy is that it helps reduce the risk of improper nuclear use and also builds international trust. It doesn’t, however, order the dismantling of nuclear weapons like the TPNW. “No First Use” is useful, but it carries along disincentives which prevent many nations from signing: nuclear-carrying states worry that it removes a layer of protection and may incentivize other countries previously not willing to attack. This tension is the reason why “No First Use” policies are rare. On the other hand, the TPNW orders the disposal of the entire nuclear arsenal of a nation, which is difficult for nuclear-carrying states to sign and accept. The United States’ and Russia’s START agreements, China’s and India’s declaration of “No First Use,” and many nations’ cooperation in disposing of their nuclear arsenal are a great start in lowering the threat of global nuclear disaster, but no nuclear-carrying state has signed the TPNW, thus still allowing for possible disaster. This, along with a recent weakening of treaties, has led to a resurgence in nuclear weapons development in recent years. As such, a solution which can effectively address this issue is necessary.

As a nation in Latin America, the first area to become a non-nuclear zone, Peru believes in regional stability and reliance on diplomacy and understands the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons. The nuclear-free zone in Latin America has reinforced cooperation between nations in the region, and Peru believes that other regions can view the Latin American nuclear-free zone as an example of how nuclear-free zones can have positive impacts on a whole region. Peru has also signed the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, followed by a unanimous congress decision to ratify the treaty, which aligns with Peru’s historical voting trends at the UN of voting for nuclear disarmament programs and nuclear-ban initiatives. In a press statement, the foreign ministry of Peru stated that Peru’s ratification of the TPNW shows “high commitment to its obligations under international human rights and humanitarian law” and how it “is in line with Peru’s commitment to promoting international peace and security to facilitate the development and growth of our peoples.” Since Peru does not face hostile neighboring nations, supporting disarmament is consistent with its efforts to prioritize humanitarian law. Overall, Peru values nuclear disarmament as a necessary step to achieve peace, a development towards stability, and a humanitarian obligation.

Ultimately, Peru aims to eliminate nuclear weaponry internationally. “No First Use” policies can act as a device to build trust between nuclear-carrying states and other nations so that tensions ease. At the same time, gradual changes to the policies of nuclear-carrying states should be made to assist in achieving this goal, including but not limited to the cessation of modernization programs, transparency on stockpile size, and caps on deployed warheads. Trust is indispensable before disarmament is possible, as only when all nations trust each other to remain peaceful can they begin curtailing nuclear weapons. After trust has been established, focus can shift towards disarmament. To incentivize disarmament, Peru encourages the United Nations to facilitate technical assistance for the dismantling of nuclear weapons to address the resource demand of dismantlement. Peru also advocates for the aforementioned nations to join the TPNW so that the disposal of nuclear weapons happens in a timely manner. By pursuing these goals, nations can work in a concerted manner to steadily reduce the global threat of nuclear weapons.

Sources:
www.icanw.org

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Delegate Name: Anish Kulkarni

Committee: Disarmament & International Security Committee
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
Delegate: Anish Kulkarni, City High Middle School

The global security environment continues to be shaped by the existence of nearly 12,000 nuclear weapons and rising geopolitical tensions. While reductions have occurred since the Cold War, the erosion of arms-control agreements and persistent alert postures heighten the risk of nuclear escalation. In this context, No First Use (NFU) policies have been debated as potential tools to reduce miscalculation, though only China and India currently maintain declared NFU policies.This lack of consensus limits the ability of NFU policies to function as a universal standard.
For the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a country emerging from decades of conflict embedded within the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, the NFU debate is not abstract. Nuclear fallout, economic destabilization, and humanitarian harms would all carry severe consequences for our nation. Thus,the DRC views discussions around NFU as connected to broader disarmament and risk-reduction efforts, even though its core priority remains the complete elimination of nuclear weapons.
The DRC remains resolute to global and regional non-proliferation frameworks, viewing adherence to said frameworks as an essential instrument to facilitate international peace and domestic stability. As a Non-Nuclear-Weapon State under the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), a State Party to the Pelindaba Treaty, and a signatory to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), the DRC rejects any ambitions towards nuclear armament. Further, the DRC accepts comprehensive safeguards administered by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and commitment towards the African Commission on Nuclear Energy (AFCONE), which legally prohibits the development, acquisition, or hosting of nuclear weapons on the continent of Africa. These commitments underscore the DRC’s emphasis on ensuring that all nuclear activities remain strictly peaceful.
The DRC’s engagement within the United Nations in promoting nuclear risk reduction, multilateral disarmament, and negative security assurances reflects its belief in cooperative approaches to nuclear governance. Given the regional security challenges at this time, the DRC strongly emphasizes strong safeguards, transparency and international assistance to prevent nuclear instability from exacerbating vulnerabilities, thereby protecting both regional and its own national security.
The DRC articulates its NFU and disarmament stance through four core principles. Firstly, the DRC views No First Use discussions as relevant to global nuclear-risk reduction. While NFU could, in theory, reduce first-strike incentives, the DRC stresses that such measures must be paired with verification, transparency, and reductions in alert levels to have meaningful impact. Second, the DRC would like to affirm that nuclear weapons have no place in Africa. Strengthening the Pelindaba Treaty and ensuring that Nuclear Weapon States (NWS) ratify to Pelindaba’s Protocols I and II is essential to provide a legally binding security assurance to the DRC and other African non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS). Thirdly, the DRC insists that NWS satisfy NPT Article VI obligations. The DRC strongly believes that disarmament progress cannot occur if NNWS shoulders the burden of compliance while NWS expands on nuclear modernization programs. Furthermore, equitable access to peaceful nuclear technologies (especially for agriculture and energy) is a core principle of the DRC’s foreign policy. Finally, the DRC emphasizes the importance of strengthening verification, transparency, and material governance. Recognizing regional vulnerabilities, the DRC prioritizes IAEA safeguards, AFCONE capacity-building, and international cooperation to prevent the illicit trafficking of radioactive materials.
In this committee, the DRC urges the strengthening of AFCONE-IAEA cooperation on safeguards training, nuclear forensics, and border security. The DRC also calls on Nuclear-Weapon States to meet their Article VI obligations to the NPT by accelerating disarmament, increasing transparency on nuclear doctrines, and halting destabilizing modernization programs. Further, the DRC continues to encourage states to adhere to the TPNW. The DRC remains committed to working collaboratively with fellow delegations to promote effective nuclear governance and contribute to lasting international peace and security.

Bibliography:
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. “Democratic Republic of the Congo.” ICAN, https://www.icanw.org/drc. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor. “Democratic Republic of the Congo.” Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor, https://banmonitor.org/profiles/democratic-republic-of-the-congo. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

United Nations General Assembly. Official Records – General Assembly First Committee, A/C.1/78/PV.13 (Statements, 16 Oct. 2023). UN Digital Library, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4067963/files/A_C.1_78_PV.13-EN.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

International Atomic Energy Agency. African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Pelindaba Treaty). IAEA, https://www.iaea.org/publications/documents/treaties/african-nuclear-weapon-free-zone-treaty-pelindaba-treaty. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

United Nations. “Statement Attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on the Conclusion of the Second Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” UN Secretary-General, 1 Dec. 2023. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2023-12-01/statement-attributable-the-spokesperson-for-the-secretary-general-the-conclusion-of-the-second-meeting-of-states-parties-the-treaty-the-prohibition-of-nuclear-weapons. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. “Democratic Republic of Congo becomes the latest Annex 2 State to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear‑Test‑Ban Treaty.” CTBTO, https://www.ctbto.org/resources/for-the-media/press-releases/democratic-republic-congo-becomes-latest-annex-2-state. Accessed 26 Nov. 2025

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: China
Delegate Name: Ananya Arulmurugan

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
People’s Republic of China
Ananya Arulmurugan

Nuclear disarmament is a prevalent issue that stems from the end of World War 2, when the United States of America dropped a nuclear bomb on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since then, there have been resounding calls to cease or reduce the threat posed by nuclear weapons, as they are one of the most urgent and pressing challenges to global peace and security. Currently, there are nine countries that possess nuclear weapons: The United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, North Korea, and the People’s Republic of China. Of those countries, only the People’s Republic of China maintains an unconditional No First Use Policy. An NFU policy is where a nuclear-armed states commit to never initiate a nuclear strike. All other countries with nuclear powers reserve the right to resort to nuclear weaponry, which can create an unsteady global environment. The United Nations has addressed this topic numerous times; in fact, DISEC was created with nuclear weapons in mind. Relevant UN documents include the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which both emphasize the need to diminish the role of nuclear weapons across the world. Furthermore, there are nuclear-weapon-free zones throughout the world where the law prohibits the use of nuclear arms. As global conflicts rise across the world, it is more important than ever to implement NFU policy and gradual disarmament to preserve international stability.
As mentioned earlier, the People’s Republic of China remains the sole nuclear power to implement a No-First-Use policy, a continuity to the country’s long-standing history of non-aggression. This policy has been in effect since 1964, when China first gained nuclear arms. China has also continuously supported disarmament efforts under the United Nations by participating in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Conference on Disarmament. China is also a vocal supporter of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, signing it in 1996. The People’s Republic of China asserts, however, that it will not get rid of its nuclear arms until all other nuclear powers also commit to disarmament. Along with these actions, maintaining a smaller nuclear arsenal, its moratorium on nuclear testing, and its continued support for nuclear reduction on the global stage affirms the People’s Republic of China’s commitment to nuclear non-aggression.
In line with those affirmations, the People’s Republic of China would like to see the world implement a universal No-First-Use Framework. A UN resolution encouraging all nuclear-weapon states to adopt NFU policies and legally binding Negative Security Assurances (pledges that nuclear states will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states), as NFU policies are the most effective and realistic nuclear risk-reduction measure available currently. Further solutions supported include lowering the operational status of nuclear weapons and a legally binding Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty. Lowering the operational status of nuclear weapons would mean making it harder to launch nuclear weapons, as many nuclear states currently maintain portions of their arsenal on hair-trigger alerts, meaning that they can launch nukes within minutes. Making it harder and slower to launch nuclear weapons can prevent rushed decisions that could end millions of lives. A Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty would ban the production of fissile materials, preventing the construction of newer, deadlier weapons. Though disarmament is good for the overall well-being of the world’s population, this process must be led by nuclear states with major arsenals, as the distribution of these weapons is a delicate balance that could easily disrupt the global stage. Therefore, while disarmament should be prioritized, it should be done slowly and realistically, considering the context surrounding it.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Germany
Delegate Name: Colin Pattison

Disarmament & International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Federal Republic of Germany
Colin Pattison
Forest Hills Eastern High School
After World War II, Germany renounced producing its own nuclear weapons, instead relying on U.S. nuclear weapons. Although post-World War II Germany has not experienced nuclear weapons and their destruction, Germany recognizes the potential risk and danger posed by nuclear weapons. In 1968, West Germany signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), affirming that it wants to halt the spread of nuclear weapons and pursue nuclear disarmament. West Germany’s signing of the NPT stayed with the country when it reunified in 1990, despite the confusion on the subject. Despite agreeing with all these terms, Germany participated in nuclear sharing under NATO, hosting around 7,300 nuclear warheads in 1971. Furthermore, in 1998–1999, Germany tried to help pass the Non-First Use (NFU) treaty; however, this treaty ultimately did not pass in NATO as a whole, failing. Ultimately, in the past, Germany has tried to agree to first-use policies and agrees with nuclear disarmament; however, it has also recognized the need to use nuclear weapons for defense.
As of right now, Germany has repeatedly supported NFU and nuclear disarmament; unfortunately, NATO has frequently rejected these policies. Germany does not currently have any NFUs in place and is still under NATO’s nuclear umbrella. Germany actively holds roughly 20 U.S. B-61 nuclear bombs from this nuclear umbrella for defense, although Germany still supports gradual, multilateral disarmament through treaties such as the NPT (which it has already ratified). Ultimately, Germany agrees with Non-First Use policies and nuclear disarmament, but has been unable to pass treaties such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) because they do not align with NATO’s views.
For the future, Germany does want NATO to eventually accept an NFU, as well as gradual, multilateral nuclear disarmament. Germany also supports future treaties on the disarmament agenda, such as the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) and the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT). Germany wants to pursue a nuclear-weapon-free future; however, current and future geopolitical conditions challenge that goal. Worries about Russia’s future motives and plans force Germany to recognize the future importance of nuclear weapons for defense. In the end, Germany wants to gradually remove nuclear weapons and encourages NATO to adopt an NFU in the future, but has faced difficulty accomplishing these due to NATO policies and the geopolitical climate.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Algeria
Delegate Name: Charlotte Dykstra

Committee: Disarmament and International Security
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria
Delegate: Charlotte Dykstra, FH Northern HS
The People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria approaches the issue of nuclear disarmament from a position shaped by lived experience and a continued commitment to global security. Algeria’s history with nuclear weapons is both traumatic and deeply political. Between 1960 and 1966, during the final years of French colonial rule, France conducted seventeen nuclear tests in the Sahara, most notably at Reggane and In Ekker. These tests released massive amounts of radioactive material into the environment, contaminating nearly 100,000 square kilometers of desert and exposing tens of thousands of Algerians to harmful radiation. The long-term health and ecological consequences (elevated cancer rates, poisoned groundwater, and uninhabitable landscapes) remain a daily reality for affected communities. This legacy forms the foundation of Algeria’s unwavering advocacy for a world without nuclear weapons.
As a nation directly harmed by nuclear testing, Algeria believes that nuclear weapons do not strengthen security; rather, they create instability, perpetuate structural injustice, and threaten civilian life. Algerian leadership has repeatedly affirmed this position with former President Abdelaziz Bouteflika stating that humanity cannot claim progress while weapons capable of destroying it remain. These statements reflect a national consensus: nuclear disarmament is not simply a diplomatic objective but a moral duty grounded in the lived suffering of Algerian citizens.
This commitment has translated into consistent action at the international level. Algeria is a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), and the Treaty of Pelindaba, which established Africa as a nuclear-weapon–free zone. Algeria was among the 122 member states that voted in favor of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) in 2017, underscoring its support for eliminating nuclear arsenals globally. Additionally, Algeria has continuously urged France to release classified data on Saharan test sites, provide compensation to victims, and support environmental remediation. France’s admission in 2010 that its Saharan tests released at least 13,000 times more radiation than initially disclosed validates Algeria’s calls for accountability and transparency.
At the same time, Algeria recognizes the value of peaceful, strictly regulated nuclear technologies. The nation maintains civilian nuclear research centers and supports the use of nuclear energy for medical, agricultural, and environmental purposes under the oversight of the International Atomic Energy Agency. This balance reflects Algeria’s belief that scientific advancement and safety can coexist.
In this committee, Algeria seeks to promote universal adherence to the TPNW, strengthen global commitments to “No First Use” policies, and develop international mechanisms to assist communities harmed by past nuclear testing. Algeria also supports expanding verification measures to ensure transparency among nuclear-armed states. Ultimately, Algeria’s position is shaped both by its historical relationship with France and by its partnerships with non-aligned countries working toward collective security. What Algeria hopes to accomplish in this body is clear: a sincere, enforceable, and equitable path toward global nuclear disarmament, ensuring that no nation endures the devastation Algeria experienced in the Sahara.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Bangladesh
Delegate Name: Henry Walser

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
Henry Walser
Forest Hills Northern
No First Use (NFU) policies are formal pledges by countries never to be the first to engage in nuclear conflict. Such commitments serve as confidence-building measures and significantly reduce the risk of wars escalating to the nuclear level. In 1998 China declared a NFU policy making it one of the only two countries to do so. China is the only country to have an unconditional NFU policy. India being the second country with an officially implemented NFU policy. Unlike China, India’s policy is conditional, India reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if an extreme biological attack occurs. Nuclear superpowers such as the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom have not committed to a NFU policy and still reserve the right to use nuclear weapons if their territory or allies are attacked. One reason for this is the prospect of nuclear weaponry deter attacks, and if NUF policies are implemented this threat is not applicable to non-nuclear but still damaging attacks. The United Nations has long worked toward the control of nuclear weapons through the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This central treaty for nuclear control opened for signature in 1968 and was put into force in 1970. This treaty works to limit pre-existing nuclear arsenals, limit the spread of nuclear weapons to new countries, and promotes safe uses of nuclear power and development. Additionally, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1996, however, it has not been put into action due to several Annex-2 states (44 states believed to have nuclear potential or be significant in the topic of nuclear weaponry) not signing. And General Assembly resolutions encouraging states to adopt NFU policies and implement measures that reduce nuclear risks.
Bangladesh has unconditionally agreed to become non-nuclear acceding to NPT on September 27th 1979. They insist on upholding article VI of NPT, which they acceded to on September 27th 1979. This article encourages all countries to cooperate in the negotiation of the reduction and elimination of nuclear weaponry. Bangladesh actively participates in NPT Preparatory Committee as well as advocates for nuclear disarmament and risk reduction while participating in the UN General Assembly. They are also members of ICAN and Bangladesh has signed on to TPNW. Bangladesh believes the existence of nuclear weapons diverts resources from health care and education. According to estimates the US alone spends 40 billion dollars a year on maintaining and storing nuclear warheads. The disarmament of nuclear weapons is critical not just for protecting military forces during wartime, but for the protection and well being of civilians outside of wartime scenarios. Bangladesh is positioned between two nuclear armed countries, India and Pakistan. India with a nuclear arsenal of 160 (2025) and Pakistan with a nuclear arsenal of 170 (2025). Along with the tense nuclear climate in South Asia, the need for NFU policies and nuclear disarmament is critical. Bangladesh urges the implementation of NFU policies to all countries with a nuclear arsenal allowing resources to be allocated towards education, healthcare, and poverty reduction, as well as preserving human life in an escalating time of war.
Bangladesh wants to limit the threat of nuclear weapons as they create risk in wartime scenarios as well as divert government money from healthcare, education, and limiting poverty. Bangladesh would like more countries to adopt NFU policies or create more concrete agreements limiting the threat of nuclear weapons, such as ratifying CTBT. In order for this to be implemented, it would require the cooperation of the entirety of the UN as new regulations are made. Bangladesh proposes that the UN general assembly establish a dedicated framework to verify adherence to NFU policies and promote transparency among nuclear-armed states. These regulations being implemented, along with the standardization of NFU policies would allow funds to be diverted to directly helping people rather than being spent on storage and maintaining warheads that will statistically never be used. It would also align with the UN’s sustainable development goals when it comes to peace and justice. Bangladesh believes reducing nuclear risk is necessary for safety and development.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Slovenia
Delegate Name: Sam Lewis

General Assembly – DISEC
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Slovenia
Sam Lewis
Since​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ World War II, the existence of nuclear weapons has been a major source of global concern. The Cold War era was a time that made people scared of a nuclear war, and therefore, countries like the US and Russia made their nuclear arsenals as large as possible. “No First Use” is when a state assures not to use nuclear weapons unless attacked first. In fact, only China and India have formally adopted this stance. The majority of NATO members, including Slovenia’s allies, are opposed to the No First Use policy as they believe it undermines their security.
Slovenia is a small country without nuclear weapons. Slovenia is in favor of disarmament and is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Slovenia has cooperated with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and is committed to implementing measures that ensure nuclear energy is used only for peaceful purposes. Besides, Slovenia joined the European Atomic Energy Community. While Slovenia was the EU Council president in 2021, it hosted conferences on disarmament and non-proliferation. Slovenia is convinced that the elimination of nuclear weapons is the surest way to have peace and security.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) came about through the efforts of the United Nations, but Slovenia chose not to sign it due to its membership in NATO. Countries in NATO that are nuclear-armed rejected the treaty. The United Nations is a long-time supporter of nuclear disarmament; as an example, it does so by urging countries to renew agreements like New START between the US and Russia.
Slovenia believes that nuclear disarmament should be done in a realistic and gradual manner. It also supports the nuclear powers being more transparent and the IAEA being given more authority to verify. Slovenia is of the opinion that NATO should give more attention to the implementation of No First Use policies. According to Slovenia, the UN General Assembly urging the nuclear-armed countries to take risk-reduction measures, such as ensuring that delivery systems are separate from warheads, is an idea worth considering. Furthermore, Slovenia is of the opinion that worldwide education in the field of nuclear energy dangers should also be promoted. Collaboration is the only way, according to Slovenia, in which nuclear disarmament can ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌happen.
Works Cited
“Report Submitted by Slovenia.” United Nations NPT Review Conference, 2021.
“No First Use.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 2025.
“Slovenia Profile.” Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor, 2024

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Finland
Delegate Name: Brady Sievert

Disarmament & International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Republic of Finland
Brady Sievert
Lakeland Union High School

The inception of nuclear weapons at the tail end of the second world war was, at the time, a successful and efficient answer to ending the years long, brutal conflict, taxing on the resources of every nation worldwide. However, in years following the conflict, the technology has only become a detriment to the betterment of mankind. At any given moment, there are over twelve thousand nuclear weapons in circulation around the world, held by nine nuclear powers. These armaments are in such numbers that the potential use of them all would essentially turn the surface of the planet into glass and render Earth uninhabitable.
Total atomic annihilation has been a looming threat over the conscience of humanity since the Cold war. And numerous times, Humanity has been on the precipice of immolation thanks to procedural failings. Nuclear weapons obviously aren’t good for the species but they have ironically had the effect of forcing the avoidance of all out conflict, due to the threat of mutually assured destruction. The adaptation of a No first use policy is well meaning but comes with complications; it would legally eliminate the creation, housing, and usage of nuclear weapons -but the operative word is legally; this would leave nations abiding by the agreement vulnerable to possible nuclear attack without any threat of response. Because of this, we as a species have placed ourselves in a dilemma: Arm ourselves until the powderkeg explodes, or, stop digging our own grave, but hope none of our own push us into it.
Ideally the United Nations should preside over the nuclear disarming of the world, but that would require significant commitments from every member. It would be extraordinarily difficult to organize the deactivation of thousands of weapons from multiple states, but the UN would be the only group where the resources to do so could be accumulated. A committee could be established to undertake the disarmament of the world but it would be an extensive task that would require insurmountable bureaucratic effort.
The Republic of Finland does not, has never, and hopes against the necessity of nuclear armament by our nation. This of course does not apply so easily to the rest of the world and our nation understands this. As one of the newest admissions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO, Finland understands the dangers of nuclear weapons and recognizes the positives that would come with nuclear disarmament, but on the grounds of agreements like the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, our country believes it would be against the security of the alliance, and impossible to strip the world’s nations of nuclear defense without leaving nations unprotected and vulnerable to atomic attack developed illegally in regard to international law. But in regard to spread of nuclear weapons capability, we believe that adherence to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty NPT, is the best step toward progress toward the betterment of mankind, and the safety of the future

Pseudo-Bibliography
https://www.icanw.org/nuclear_arsenals

Finland and Non-Proliferation: 50 Years of Implementing …

Vienna Center for Disarmament and Non‑Proliferation
https://vcdnp.org › finland-non-proliferation-50-years-…

https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons

https://www.iaea.org/topics/non-proliferation-treaty

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Brazil
Delegate Name: Wendell Cornell

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Brazil
Wendell C. Cornell

A ban on nuclear weapons for all countries with no double standards is necessary for the prosperity of the modern world. Nuclear weapons were first developed in the United States after receiving intelligence that Germany was building nuclear weapons. Soon after the end of the second World War, the USSR developed nuclear weapons. For nearly 50 years, an outright war between the two was avoided because they had mutually assured destruction (2).
Brazil had a secret nuclear program during the military dictatorship of 1964-85, however the program was officially dismantled in 1990. In 1998, Brazil signed into the Non-Proliferation Treaty (4), and later signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (4). We have nuclear capabilities however, having the highest uranium reserves by extraction cost (5). We now have a civic nuclear program, with 2 reactors and are working on a nuclear powered submarine (4).
Resolutions regarding this issue include the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). Brazil approves of this treaty, and we are also a member (3). This treaty contains no tolerance for threats, development, movement, stockpiling, testing, and use of/about nuclear weapons (3). This treaty contains everything we approve of, however it is still an ongoing issue, because all of the countries that have nuclear weapons are not in it.
Brazil believes that treaties that do not go to this level and contain double standards are the reasons for ongoing issues regarding nukes. We support the actions of the TPNW, and do not condone the continued testing of nuclear weapons by many powerful nations. We support the testing of nuclear energy, however acknowledge the danger it poses. We also do not condone the mutually assured destruction that has existed since the 50s. We believe that a safer way that helps not just superpowers, but all other countries is the complete elimination of all nuclear weapons. Brazil is not alone on this, the majority of countries have this stance, however we don’t approve of the unreasonable amount of power in the hands of very few countries.

[1] “Brazil.” The Nuclear Threat Initiative, 19 July 2025, www.nti.org/countries/brazil. Accessed 24 Nov. 2025.
[2] Cleveland, Harlan. “The Cold War.” National Archives, 24 Sept. 2016, www.archives.gov/research/foreign-policy/cold-war/symposium/cleveland.html.
[3] “Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons | United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs.” Unoda.org, 2025, disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons.
[4] United Nations. “Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” Treaties.un.org, treaties.un.org/pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002801d56c5.
[5] “Uranium Reserves by Country 2024.” Worldpopulationreview.com, worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/uranium-reserves-by-country.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Israel
Delegate Name: Craig Harmer

Representing Israel I cannot confirm nor can I deny Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons. Israel believes in a security first and the protection of its citizens, though as we have stated we are to not confirm nor deny our possession of nuclear weapons, however we must have to use them for our security and protection of our citizens. As seen we are currently in conflict with Hamas in the country of Palestine and the protection and safety of our citizens is vital. We only will agree with a solution if it benefits the safety and protection of our citizens as this is vital to us. In the past Israel has boycotted nuclear disarmament multiple times including the 2017 negotiations and the annual general assembly. Israel believes in nuclear weapons as a last resort weapon. Israel is looking for a solution which benefits its people.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Thailand
Delegate Name: Brendan Murphy

DISEC
No First Use and Nuclear Disarmament
Thailand
Brendan Murphy

Ever since their inception and consequent use in 1945 on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear weapons have only grown in number and power. They have the ability to destroy entire cities, and leave devastating effects on the environment that can be felt for decades after the fact. Although they have only been used twice in actual warfare, we know their devastating effects from those two cases and the thousands of nuclear tests done by various countries. All out nuclear war would kill billions, and efforts to reduce the risk of such an event or prevent them altogether have been largely unsuccessful. Currently, China is the only country with a true “No First Use” policy, meaning they won’t use their nuclear weapons unless they are used against them first, while others have only limited disarmament from the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START).
Thailand has been a key country in the advancement of disarmament progress over the years, with many treaties being heavily supported by the country. Thailand strongly believes that to achieve international peace and security, full scale disarmament and arms control is necessary. The country also has a strict policy to not develop, produce, or proliferate any forms of Weapons of mass destruction. This is why Thailand has signed and been a part of many treaties in the past. The Partial Test Ban Treaty, which Thailand ratified in 1963, prohibited all test detonations of nuclear weapons except for those conducted underground. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which Thailand ratified in 1972, aimed to stop the spread and creation of nuclear weapons. In 2017, Thailand was among the first countries to sign and ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, demonstrating a strong commitment to total nuclear disarmament. Thailand has continued to encourage other members to follow suit, however many have yet to.
Thailand believes that in order to foster a safe and secure international community, disarmament and arms control is a requirement for everyone in the international community. Thailand will continue to push for more countries to ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and believes it is a large step forward towards total nuclear disarmament. Along with this, Thailand will continue to support other members who support disarmament, and will continue to support legislation of the same nature. Thailand will also continue to attempt to make other countries aware of the dangers nuclear weapons pose, and why disarmament is important.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Bahrain
Delegate Name: Neel Grover

Nuclear weapons exist as an existential threat for all of humanity, and the possibility of use remains a clear and present danger that must be resolved. While treaties such as the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty and Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have made strides, the lack of participation from nuclear-capable states, among other issues, have left much to be desired. The P5 have failed to uphold Article VI of the NPT, and for over 5 decades they have maintained and, in some cases, modernized their arsenals. This makes the NPT a tool used by a few states to hold nuclear weapons while restricting others. Since the late 1960s, a nuclear asymmetry has existed in the Middle East. While many states have renounced the development of nuclear weapons, a few states have never joined the NPT, continuing to perpetrate the double standard perpetuated by the international community. Bahrain emphasizes that the only guarantee against the use of nuclear weapons is their total elimination, and until then, non-nuclear weapon states require binding security assurances.

In the Middle East, regional security is impossible while one state remains outside the NPT and another state engages in ambiguous nuclear activities. A proposal to sustain safety for states in the Middle East is the Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction. This would ensure universal adherence to the NPT, alleviating concerns on the imbalance of nuclear power, which will especially support small states. Bahrain reiterates that regional stability remains fragile so long as the Middle East lacks a comprehensive prohibition on weapons of mass destruction, and calls upon all states in the region to accede to the NPT as non-nuclear members.

The kingdom of Bahrain maintains its belief that full compliance with the NPT’s legal obligations is non-negotiable. While Bahrain is one of the chief supporters of the right of all states to peaceful nuclear technology, this right must also come with full transparency and verification. Bahrain calls upon all states to adhere strictly to the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements and the Additional Protocol with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Nuclear activities without full clarity weaken regional security and jeopardize international relations.

Bahrain acknowledges the humanitarian motivation behind the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and welcomes it as a powerful show of the global stance against the danger of nuclear weapons. However, the NPT remains the cornerstone of global non-proliferation and disarmament. Efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons must not undercut the NPT, but instead add to it by establishing more strict/enforceable commitments and measurable progress toward the complete and verifiable destruction of all nuclear arsenals.

The Kingdom of Bahrain views the persistent failure to fulfill Article VI of the NPT and the modernization of nuclear arsenals as a threat to global security. The immediate priority must be to enforce the rule of law of non-proliferation by securing universal adherence to the NPT and taking solid steps to establish the Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction. Bahrain urges that nuclear-weapon states move beyond rhetoric and provide binding Negative Security Assurances to ensure a future free of nuclear danger.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Chile
Delegate Name: Michael Fuger

Nuclear disarmament has a long history at the UN. In fact, nuclear disarmament was the subject of the first resolution back in 1946. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons came into effect in 1970, to prevent more states from acquiring nuclear weapons. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was negotiated in 2017 and 74 states are currently parties to it. China and India currently have no first use policies, promising that they will only use nuclear weapons to retaliate for a previous attack. The rest of the nuclear states do not have these policies. Non-nuclear states also cannot have no first use policies, as they do not have any nuclear weapons to use, and total nuclear disarmament is more in their interests.

The Republic of Chile is fully committed to nuclear disarmament. Chile is not a nuclear state, and is a party to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and the Treaty of Tlatelolco. Latin American countries have long led nuclear disarmament efforts, and Chile certainly is a part of this. Chile regularly sponsors resolutions at the United Nations calling for universal ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). Chile has long supported the effort to make Latin America nuclear-free, and ratified the Treaty of Tlatelolco in 1974. Chile believes that funds used in nuclear programs would be better used for international cooperation in areas such as education or environmental protection. Chile emphasizes the importance of nuclear disarmament as essential to the survival of humanity. Furthermore, we believe that nuclear weapons are illegal because of their incompatibility with humanitarian law.

Chile stresses the importance of international cooperation on nuclear disarmament. All nuclear states must commit to complete nuclear disarmament in a defined period of time. We would also like to expand the nuclear-free zone concept from South America to other regions. An argument we believe should bring nuclear states to our point of view relates to the huge cost of maintaining nuclear arsenals. Chile encourages countries to use these funds to cooperate on efforts involving the environment, education, or other important areas, instead of supporting a destructive arms race.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Ireland
Delegate Name: Rocco Morrow

Nuclear weapons pose a horrifying threat to any and all nations and civilians globally. The mere thought of nuclear warfare being employed sends shivers down one’s spine. The immense human suffering associated with these types of weapons alone is proof that these weapons are heinous. Ireland is committed to a humanitarian-centered and legally grounded approach to the process of nuclear disarmament. By looking at governments and the UN as key leaders in disarmament efforts and promoting policies like “No First Use”, Ireland hopes to put an end to the atrocities associated with nuclear weapons for good.

Although Ireland does not possess nuclear weapons, we still believe “No First Use” to be a step in the right direction in reducing the risk of nuclear warfare. Given that, Ireland prefers legally binding negative security assurances over voluntary “No First Use” pledges. While “No First Use” could help to signal restraint and keep tensions low, Ireland warns that “No First Use” doesn’t fix the humanitarian issue posed by other countries’ ownership of nuclear weapons. Furthermore, Ireland stresses that government and UN leadership is the key to nuclear disarmament efforts. By taking action through legislation and treaties and gaining critical support from civil society and various advocacy groups, Ireland is a strong proponent of finding solutions to this particular issue legally.

In conclusion, Ireland aims to promote complete nuclear disarmament through treaty-based commitments, leadership in multilateral forums, and above all else, the humanitarian principles that we continue to stand for and live by. Although Ireland believes that “No First Use” is a helpful tool, we stress that it is not capable of fully disarming nations of their
nuclear weapons, and therefore, cannot replace full disarmament. Ireland supports the idea that the ball is in governments’ and the UN’s court along with the help of advocacy groups and civil society. Holding no nuclear weapons of our own, Ireland should be seen as the archetype for responsible behavior in regards to nuclear disarmament. Overall, Ireland is committed to the idea of nuclear weapons being completely eliminated in order to achieve true global security.

Works Cited:
Poole, Gregory. “Home.” GLICA.Org, GLICA.org, 6 Nov. 2025,
glica.org/glimun/committees/nuclear-use-and-disarmament/.
Disarmament and Non-Proliferation | Department of Foreign Affairs | Ireland.Ie, www.ireland.ie/en/dfa/role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/disarmamen t-and-non-proliferation/.
“Statement by Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney on Nuclear Disarmament Coalition.” Gov.Ie,
www.gov.ie/en/department-of-foreign-affairs/press-releases/statement-by-minister-for-fore ign-affairs-simon-coveney-on-nuclear-disarmament-coalition/.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Philippines
Delegate Name: Evan Puzzuoli

The delegation of the Philippines acknowledges the critical issue of potential Nuclear Weapons usage. We believe that it poses a plethora of consequences, none of which are good for human development or the overall good of humanity. If we choose not to act right now, the usage, supply, and number of Nuclear Weapons will only proliferate, continuing to kill our people. We have taken many steps to ensure the safety of our people. We believe that collaboration on this topic is vital for the assurance of safety of not just our people, but the people of the world. We look forward to discussing this pressing issue with the rest of the committee in hopes of finding a solution that will protect our friends, family, and children.

Nuclear Weapons are potentially the largest threat facing humanity today due to their long range capabilities and blast radius. These weapons are considered indiscriminate which means there is no possible way for them to avoid civilian death. These weapons allow for a country to decide to destroy an entire country. While the argument of mutually assured destruction is in play, it fails to account for the fact that these weapons are giving far too much power to a singular government. This argument also fails to realize that government officials do not always act in the best interest of their citizens, so a country’s citizens should not be killed due to decisions made by their officials. Many countries agree with the fact that nuclear weapons should not be used, however many countries have not yet agreed to The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in which countries agree to not to transfer nuclear weapons. Currently, no nuclear powers have agreed to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which has countries agree to cease making nuclear weapons and decommission current inventories of nuclear weapons. Many countries are taking a stand on their own such as a “No First Use Policy” in which a country agrees not to attack first with nuclear weapons such as China, another example is the START Policy between Russia and the United States which limits the amount of nuclear weapons.

The delegation of the Philippines has taken drastic steps to attempt to ensure the safety of humanity. One example of this is signing in 2018, ratifying in early 2021, and enforcing in mid 2021 the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The delegation of the Philippines is steadfast in continuing its set precedent of being an anti nuclear weapons state that has never and will never have any nuclear weapons within it boarder even if it is for another country. The delegation of the Philippines is motivated to ensure that no country has nuclear weapons and will continue its role as an anti nuclear weapons advocate.

The delegation of the Philippines is committed to the further disarmament of nuclear weapons for all countries and are unwavering on ensuring the safety of the citizens of the world. We believe that now is the time to act, and we feel that we as a whole must unite and take action to ensure the safety and continuity of humanity. Now is the time to act; this may very well be our last chance.

https://www.icanw.org/philippines
https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/16/politics/us-russia-nuclear-treaty
https://glica.org/glimun/committees/nuclear-use-and-disarmament/

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Sierra Leone
Delegate Name: Chase Martin

The Republic of Sierra Leone has long supported the advent of global peace, security, and multilateral cooperation as essential paragons of the international community. Although Sierra Leone does not have, or seek to have, nuclear weapons, Sierra Leone remains committed to supporting disarmament and strengthening international norms against the use of nuclear weaponry. Sierra Leone views nuclear weapons as indiscriminate tools of war whose devastating humanitarian and environmental consequences will never be justified under any circumstances. As a state that has endured violent conflicts in its own history, Sierra Leone firmly supports international frameworks that prioritize human safety, uphold international law, and promote lasting stability. The delegation has been a vocal supporter of both the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT) and the Treaty on the Prohibition of nuclear weapons (TPNW). The NPT remains foundational in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and Sierra Leone would like to encourage states that have not supported the treaty to do so to strengthen mutually beneficial cooperation and transparency.

In conclusion, these commitments, The Republic of Sierra Leone reaffirms that meaningful progress in global disarmament can only be achieved through collective action, sustained dialogue, and unwavering respect for international law. Sierra Leone urges all member states present to strengthen their fealty to existing disarmament frameworks, pursue confidence building measures, and engage constructively in multilateral negotiations. Only through shared responsibility, accountability, and genuine cooperation can this committee help eliminate the threat posed by nuclear weapons and move toward a safer, more stable, and more peaceful world for all of its inhabitants.

Citations:
Safety and security – sierra Leone Travel Advice. GOV.UK. (n.d.). https://www.gov.uk/foreign travel-advice/sierra-leone/safety-and-security
Global Programme on preventing and Countering Terrorism 2022 – 2027. (n.d.). https://www.unodc.org/res/terrorism/aboutus/UNODC_TPB_New_Global_Programme_ab ridged_online.pdf
Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) | United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (n.d.). https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear weapons/treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons | United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (n.d.).
https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: India
Delegate Name: Rayyan Abu Azine

In August of 1945, the first and only time a new technological weapon was used with such a great level of destruction. It brought an end to the war and also erased the lives of over 200,000 people and affected even more people from nuclear fallout and radiation. Nuclear weapons spare no lives and are indiscriminate when it comes to destruction and devastation. Since then, nuclear warfare has never been more dangerous than right now and poses a great threat to humanity, and will cost millions of innocent lives. This has caused many to use the No First Use policy, which is an agreement and pledge that a nation will not be the first to use nuclear weapons in any conflict and consider retaliation if attacked by nuclear weapons first. No First Use has been made by nations that possess nuclear weapons. NFU policies have offered an idea of peace through minimizing ambiguity on how other nations intend to use their nuclear weapons and international transparency. It promotes global stability by giving no incentive to nations to start a nuclear war.
Many have argued that adversaries can not be seen as credible, and there is no guarantee that foreign adversaries will follow through, and there is no true way of verifying these claims. Even though NFUs advocate for limiting the use of nuclear weapons, it doesn’t actually reduce the number of warheads every country has, meaning that even when not in use, nuclear weapons still pose a great threat. The NFU pledge was first publicly stated by China in 1964 and has been the strongest advocate since, alongside the Republic of India. Countries without the NFU pledge include many G-7 including France, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Russia, and many more.
The Republic of India has approximately 180 warheads among its capabilities to be airborne via French-manufactured Mirage 2000H fighter jets and Land/Sea-based Ballistic Missiles. The Republic of India classifies nuclear weapons as instruments for national/collective security. This has been legitimized through the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1995. The Republic of India strongly believes in the strategic interests to require effective and credible nuclear deterrence and the capability to retaliate need be the right to self-defense and national sovereignty. The Republic of India has been a big advocate of the NFU pledge since the 90s and further solidified in the early 2000s. The Republic of India will invoke measures to counter if posed a threat. India will not be the first to initiate nuclear but will respond with equal or of greater response if prior countermeasures are to fail.
The Republic of India looks forward to working with this committee to prioritize global stability/agreement, transparency with nuclear intention, and alternative solutions prior to nuclear use, while not infringing on nations’ sovereignty and right to self-defense.

Sources:
Panda, Ankit. “‘No First Use’ and Nuclear Weapons.” Council on Foreign Relations, 17 Jul. 2018, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/no-first-use-and-nuclear-weapons.

Harvey, John R. “Assessing the Risks of a Nuclear ‘No First Use’ Policy.” War on the Rocks, 5 Jul. 2019, https://warontherocks.com/2019/07/assessing-the-risks-of-a-nuclear-no-first-use-policy/#:~:text=Viewed%20through%20a%20strategic%20%E2%80%94%20and,willing%20to%20break%20a%20promise.
“No First Use: Frequently Asked Questions.” Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, 31 May 2019, https://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/no-first-use/no-first-use-frequently-asked-questions/.

“India’s Draft Nuclear Doctrine.” Arms Control Association, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/1999-07/indias-draft-nuclear-doctrine?utm_source. Accessed 24 Nov. 2025.

“India Statement Delivered by Secretary (West) at the Annual High Level Meeting on ‘International Day for The Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.’” Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl%2F37149%2FIndia_statement_delivered_by_Secretary_West_at_the_Annual_High_Level_Meeting_on_International_Day_for_The_Total_Elimination_of_Nuclear_Weapons=&utm_source. Accessed 24 Nov. 2025.

“Nuclear Disarmament India.” The Nuclear Threat Initiative, 14 Nov. 2025, https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/india-nuclear-disarmament/?utm_source.

“India’s ‘No First Use’ Nuclear Doctrine.” MP-IDSA, 16 Sep. 2019, https://www.idsa.in/publisher/comments/indias-no-first-use-nuclear-doctrine?utm_source.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Iran
Delegate Name: Lydia Lawrenson

The Islamic Republic of Iran, as a representative of Islam, sees the malicious violence caused towards civilians through the usage of Nuclear weaponry as Haram (Forbidden). For this reason, Iran fully supports the universal adoption of No First Use policies and advocates for making nuclear disarmament a mandatory obligation for all of the United Nations. Iran also expresses deep concern toward those UN member nations that are signatories to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that have failed to uphold their commitments by continuing to expand nuclear stockpiles. This is especially alarming given the additional development of nuclear weapons by four nations not recognized under the NPT framework. While Iran acknowledges that every sovereign nation has the fundamental right to self-defense and scientific advancement, Iran emphasizes that the continued accumulation of nuclear weapons goes far beyond any reasonable military necessity and instead fuels instability and distrust within the United Nations.
The delegation of Iran urges all nations currently in possession of nuclear weapons to take the necessary steps toward decommissioning their arsenals in alignment with the principles outlined in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). By getting rid of these weapons safely, the international community can have genuine trust and demonstrate a shared commitment to preventing catastrophic warfare. However, Iran also acknowledges the reality that some nations may still seek to disrupt global peace and stability for their own self-interests. In such circumstances, Iran recognizes that discussions around policies such as First Use must remain on the table to deter those who threaten the safety of innocent civilians or who challenge decades of efforts toward disarmament. For lasting peace to take root, cooperation and accountability must come before military prioritizations.
Furthermore, the Islamic Republic of Iran emphasizes that, as stated in the NPT’s three pillars, every nation retains the right to pursue peaceful nuclear programs. This includes access to vital resources such as uranium, which, despite its association with nuclear weapons, serves critical purposes in fields such as medicine, scientific research, and the development of clean nuclear energy. Iran affirms that as long as other nations commit to halting further escalation in the obtaining of nuclear weapons, Iran will continue to ensure that its own nuclear policies and scientific institutions remain in compliance with international regulations. This includes adhering to the guidelines established by the NPT and other UN-approved agreements designed to minimize unnecessary global harm. Among these agreements is the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), originally created in 1991 and continually updated to reflect modern technological and military advancements between the United States and the Russian Federation. START and its successor, New START, display the value of bilateral cooperation in reducing global nuclear threats by restricting delivery systems, limiting warheads, and building verification mechanisms. These agreements serve as important examples of the type of diplomatic engagement necessary between nations whose nuclear relations remain unstable.
Iran calls upon the United Nations to strengthen and expand its regulatory framework by establishing clearer, more enforceable rules specifically directed at the nations that currently possess nuclear weapons. These regulations should include well-defined guidelines as well as concrete consequences, such as sanctions or harsher punishment if such rules are violated. Existing treaties should serve as the foundation for a more exact set of protections that reflect the seriousness of the devastation nuclear weapons can cause. Nations that wield such destructive power must recognize not only the immense responsibility they bear, but also the profound dangers inherent in maintaining these arsenals without regard for international law or humanitarian concerns. The Islamic Republic of Iran stands for a safer, more cooperative international community. Iran remains ready to work collaboratively with its close member states to transform this shared vision into a lasting future by implementing the no-first use policies.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/328996

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12106

https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/07/03/5-things-to-know-about-china-iran-security-cooperation/#:~:text=1.,2.

https://www.norwich.edu/topic/all-blog-posts/khameneis-nuclear-fatwa-religious-ruling-or-political-strategy#:~:text=Iranian%20Foreign%20Minister%20Abbas%20Araghchi,their%20implications%20within%20Islamic%20jurisprudence.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Egypt
Delegate Name: Prisha Thakker

Since the first atomic bombs were dropped on Japan in 1945, nuclear weapons have remained one of the central threats to global peace and human survival. Their destructive power is indiscriminate, and even a limited nuclear exchange would produce human, environmental, and political consequences that would echo for generations. Within the United Nations, nuclear disarmament has long been a priority, yet progress remains slow and uneven. For the Arab Republic of Egypt, eliminating nuclear weapons is essential not only for global security but also for the stability of the Middle East, a region already strained by conflict and asymmetries in military capability.
One key issue before DISEC is the potential adoption of “No First Use” (NFU) policies by nuclear-armed states. Egypt recognizes that NFU can reduce tensions by clarifying nuclear doctrines and lowering the risk of miscalculation between rivals. If a state publicly commits to not using nuclear weapons unless first attacked with them, it becomes less likely that a crisis could escalate into a catastrophic nuclear exchange. However, Egypt also stresses that NFU alone is insufficient. A verbal pledge is meaningful only if paired with transparency, verification, and broader disarmament commitments. Without these, NFU risks becoming a symbolic gesture that allows nuclear-armed states to maintain their arsenals indefinitely.
Egypt’s position on nuclear disarmament is grounded in decades of consistent diplomacy. Egypt signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons NPT in 1968 and ratified it in 1981, viewing the treaty as an essential framework for preventing nuclear war. Yet Egypt has also been clear that the NPT’s credibility depends on the willingness of the five recognized nuclear weapons states to fulfill their Article VI obligations to negotiate toward complete nuclear disarmament. As long as these states continue to modernize their arsenals, the global non-proliferation regime risks losing legitimacy.
A major pillar of Egypt’s foreign policy has been the creation of a Middle East Nuclear-Weapon Free-Zone (MENWFZ). Since 1974, Egypt has introduced the annual UN General Assembly resolution calling for the zone, arguing that lasting Regional security cannot be achieved while nuclear weapons remain in the Middle East. Egypt played a decisive role in the 1995 NPT review and extension conference, where it secured a commitment by all parties to pursue a conference on establishing a MENWFZ. Although political barriers have slowed progress, Egypt continues to participate in UN-hosted meetings on the topic and remains the Region’s most persistent advocate for eliminating weapons of mass destruction.
Egypt’s record reflects its credibility: it possesses no nuclear weapons, maintains a peaceful nuclear program under IAEA oversight, and has expressed openness to enhanced safeguards if Global disarmament advances reciprocally. Egypt’s approach has consistently emphasized fairness. No State should be expected to accept permanent constraints while others maintain strategic privileges.
Egypt also acknowledges positive steps such as the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons (TPNW) and bilateral agreements like New START, though it remains concerned that nuclear-armed states have not joined the TPNW and continue modernizing their arsenals. As a result, the risk of nuclear use, intentional or accidental, remains dangerously high.
For these reasons, Egypt supports a practical path forward: DISEC should promote a multilateral, legally binding NFU framework monitored by the UN or IAEA; advance phased, verifiable disarmament with increased transparency; and renew efforts to establish a Middle East Nuclear-weapon-Free Zone through a dedicated UN Special Envoy. Ultimately, Egypt believes that nuclear disarmament must be paired with broader conflict reduction efforts, and remains committed to working with all nations to pursue a world free from the threats of nuclear weapons.

Works Cited
https://cnpp.iaea.org/public/countries/EG/profile/highlights.
https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaty-between-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-russian-federation-on-measures-for-the-further-reduction-and-limitation-of-strategic-offensive-arms/.
https://docs.un.org/en/A/79/404.
https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons.
https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Pakistan
Delegate Name: Broderick McDonald

11/18/25
Submitted To: DISEC (GA).
From: Pakistan
Subject: NO FIRST USE POLICIES & NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

The disarmament of nuclear weapons is something that the country of Pakistan agrees should happen. Still, the country of Pakistan is not in complete agreement with unilateral disarmament, which is why Pakistan has not officially signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Unilateral disarmament is the act of one country giving up or renouncing its nuclear weapons without having the surrounding countries around it do the same. As of November 13, 2025, Pakistan has a stockpile of around 170 nuclear warheads. These warheads are not deployed on their launchers but rather kept in Pakistan’s central storage facility. The country of Pakistan also continues to produce HEU, which is Highly Enriched Uranium, while also producing plutonium for its nuclear weapons programs. While Pakistan holds nuclear weapons, they do not hold a no-first-use policy. Diplomats have claimed that if Pakistan adopted a no-first-use policy, then they would contribute enormously to international peace. Even though Pakistan would like to work towards this for global peace, Pakistan’s financial instability, geopolitical location to a long-standing enemy, and its bilateral nuclear understandings with countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey mean it should maintain nuclear armament without a no-first-use policy in an effort to remain competitive and feel secure on the global stage.
If we adopt a no-first-use policy, what will happen to poor, financially insecure countries when countries around them want to take more land, resources, and/or people that don’t belong to them? It would leave Pakistan and its people nearly defenseless against the countries that hold greater nuclear power and influence, due to their No-First-Use Policies. Should Pakistan feel the need to defend themselves against said countries, Pakistan feels that having Nuclear arms as well as being a bilateral understanding state with others, means having that sense of security without having to adopt a defensive posture that could save its country. Also, what happens once a nuclear disarmament treaty has been agreed upon? Nuclear weapons are currently defined as “designed to release energy in an explosive manner as a result of nuclear fission, nuclear fusion, or a combination of the two processes” (Britannica, 2025). Pakistan understands why disarming bombs such as these can promote global peace, but it worries about what kinds of weapons would replace them or could still be used. For example, the MOAB bomb (Mother Of All Bombs) is a non-nuclear weapon. This bomb is so powerful that when used, it has a yield of approximately 11 tons. A better solution to come up with, instead of nuclear disarmament, is a strengthening of nuclear security. Strengthening nuclear security means increasing support for international nuclear security programs and treaties, such as the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM).
While researching feasible solutions Pakistan can contribute to regarding no-first-use policies and nuclear disarmament, it became apparent that transparency is essential to other countries. The country of Pakistan thinks that an increase in transparency and having confidence-building measures (CBMs) on Nuclear Weapons could be both great things that help us keep our bilateral nuclear understandings. India’s no-first-use declaration (1999 Draft Nuclear Doctrine + 2003 Update) is shaping Pakistan’s NFU (No-First-Use) stance. This precedent is also why India officially declared an NFU policy in 1999, amended in 2003 to allow nuclear use in response to chemical or biological attacks. Another thing that this precedent does is cite Pakistan’s inconsistencies in India’s doctrine and conventional imbalances as reasons for why they keep rejecting NFU.
As a committee, Pakistan believes that we can collectively contribute to international peace without having to take action with a no-first-use policy and nuclear disarmament. Being able to trust your neighbors is a privilege we can all have if we don’t close off or impose bans on self-defense, but instead work towards transparency and bilateral agreements.

India Nuclear Update – 2003

https://mofa.gov.pk/arms-control-and-disarmament

https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weapon/Gun-assembly-implosion-and-boosting

Nuclear Disarmament Pakistan

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/india/pakistan-can-contribute-to-global-peace-by-adopting-no-first-use-nuclear-policy-india-2/

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Switzerland
Delegate Name: Kenna Charbauski

Disarmament & International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Switzerland
Kenna Charbauski
Forest Hills Northern High School
​
The existence of nuclear weapons serves as a constant underlying threat to all nations of the world. Over 12,000 atomic warheads lie in wait, many in military stockpiles with the ability to unleash mass destruction at any point. This threat to global security must be addressed delicately, balancing state security and humanitarian concerns. The United Nations (UN) has met previously on these issues, yet few substantive steps towards disarmament have been taken. Switzerland urges fellow states to join in the current agreements and implement those policies, rather than look for a new solution.

Since the first global meeting on nuclear disarmament, Switzerland has been actively involved in efforts for global peace. Switzerland ratified the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1977 and implemented its recommendations internally. Similarly, Switzerland ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. However, Switzerland is not a party to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as it may undermine national security in the context of a European war. The treaty does not clearly list prohibitions and practical disarmament steps, possibly imposing restrictions on peaceful nuclear energy use and research. Additionally, it is necessary that states’ cooperation in terms of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense is not intruded on. This may pose a risk to state security and yield little improvement. The TPNW also does not make significant improvements in addressing the humanitarian consequences of nuclear warfare. Nuclear weapons cannot be used in any method that complies with international humanitarian law. Their building, testing, and detonation all pose a significant risk to life. A treaty is needed that facilitates state partnership, the sending of aid, and assistance in humanitarian efforts after nuclear detonation.

Nuclear weapons need a globally applicable regulation like that which is currently imposed on chemical and biological weapons. The TPNW is intended to do this, but Switzerland cannot support it due to some of its glaring issues. The state of Switzerland hopes to develop a resolution that will meet the needs of member states that do and don’t possess nuclear weapons alike. Switzerland recommends this include increased incentives for No First Use Policies, practical steps for government led disarmament, and clauses that meet the concerns of nations currently abstaining from passing treaties on the topic. As a committee, DISEC will need to move forward with caution and not rush to pass a plan. It is important to reinforce the NPT, not propose a weaker norm. Switzerland shares the goals of a world free of nuclear weapons with many other states. It is imperative that the resolution passed is comprehensive and legally binding in a way that will protect all nations.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Japan
Delegate Name: Shephard Bower

Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth, and their existence continues to shape global security. From the moment they were first developed during World War II, these weapons have significantly influenced diplomatic strategy, military financing and planning, and the balance of power between nations. Although nuclear weapons may be viewed as a way to discourage or end large conflicts, the risks of accidental launch, escalating international tensions, and killing thousands of innocent civilians raise a serious question about whether their benefits outweigh their dangers. These concerns have prompted the United Nations (UN) to develop multiple solutions, including the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). In addition to the UN’s solutions, multiple nations have created domestic and international policies limiting the use of atomic weapons, an example being China’s No First Use policy, and the United States’ New START treaty with Russia. Despite these international and national efforts, significant concerns remain about the pace of disarmament, compliance with nuclear-armed weapons, and the persisting threats these weapons pose to global safety.

Due to its history, Japan possesses both a major personal and central role in the global debate over nuclear weapons. As the only nation to have suffered atomic bombings, Japan is a major advocate for disarmament and the prevention of future nuclear tragedies. This experience has strongly shaped Japan’s foreign policy, leading it to be a strong proponent of the NPT and the ultimate goal of a world without nuclear weapons. Additionally, at the domestic level, in 1967, Japan created the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, which include to not possess, not produce, and not permit the introduction of nuclear weapons into its territory. Japan has also backed initiatives, such as the IAEA’s Safeguards System, which verifies that nuclear material and facilities are not diverted for weapons purposes. Japan somewhat depends on nuclear defense, as it relies on the United States’ nuclear umbrella for protection in a region constantly threatened by growing nuclear powers, including North Korea, China, and Russia. Due to this reliance on nuclear power for national security, Japan is not a signatory to the TPNW, as it could interfere with its security strategy.

To promote eventual global disarmament, Japan proposes an approach aimed at eventual disarmament. First, strengthen existing treaties like the NPT with stricter verification and disarmament methods and commitments to ensure nuclear powers simultaneously reduce their stockpiles. Second, increase transparency through mandatory reporting of nuclear capabilities to develop trust among nations. Third, continue to support the IAEA in monitoring compliance and encouraging the responsible use of nuclear materials. Finally, promote peaceful nuclear technology and non-nuclear security strategies.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Lithuania
Delegate Name: Siddharth Gatla

Delegate: Siddharth Gatla
Country: Lithuania
Committee: DISEC
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
School: Okemos High School

No-First-Use policies are nuclear policies in which a country declares they’ll never resort to nuclear weapons first in a conflict. This policy only applies to only nuclear-armed states and it is built based on commitments. These countries include the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, North Korea, and Israel. These countries are extremely populous and roughly account for 45% of the world’s population, which is why nuclear war is so detrimental. First-use-policies and nuclear disarmament reduce the risk of nuclear war and help ease international tensions. The UN has done several actions on nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation such as establishing the NPT. The NPT is a multinational treaty that commits nuclear-armed countries to pursue disarmament and non-nuclear-armed countries to forgo acquiring nuclear weapons. The UN also adopted the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which bans development, testing, producing, stationing, stockpiling, using or threatening the use of nuclear weapons.
Lithuania recognizes the need to address Nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation amid current tensions with Russia and Belarus. Lithuania currently does not hold any nuclear weapons of any kind. Lithuania has accepted the NPT and maintains agreements with the IAEA to ensure nuclear materials are not used for harmful purposes. Lithuania also ratified the Comprehensive-Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1999 and participates in many nonproliferation regimes and agreements. Lithuania strongly supports the disarmament of nuclear weapons, however Lithuania will not sign the TPNW because signing it will expose strategic vulnerabilities to Russia and Belarus.
Lithuania recommends that the UN uses a No-First-Use policy in which all nine countries sign the agreement. If all nine countries sign it, tensions between countries like The United States and Russia, and India and Pakistan, would ease. Countries wouldn’t have to constantly fear nuclear war and it would increase the mutual trust countries have with one another. Lithuania also supports a ban on non-nuclear countries holding nuclear weapons for nuclear countries. This is seen in the Belarusian tactical reinforcement in which Russian nuclear bombs are being held in Belarus. This reinforcement destabilizes the tensions in Eastern Europe and threatens international peace. A ban on this would reduce the spread of nuclear weaponry, and prevent potential wars from happening. Lithuania supports every effort to reduce the nuclear armory of nuclear-nations as long as the efforts aren’t harmful.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Ethiopia
Delegate Name: Ben Stuart

DELEGATE: Benjamin Stuart
COUNTRY: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
COMMITTEE: Disarmament & International Security Committee
TOPIC: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

Nuclear weapons are a power that could cause massive damage to humanity yet a power held in the hands of just a few countries. Nuclear weapons have proliferated to and saturated 8-9 countries. These countries have the power to cause enormous amounts of human suffering and destruction. During volatile situations such as war predicaments between two countries can spiral out into disaster for the world.

Ethiopia believes that the only way to keep the world safe from nuclear weapons is to get rid of them altogether. To ensure the safety of the world now and the world of future generations nuclear weapons must be done away with for good. The devastation that can be wrought by nuclear weapons can be avoided. No first use, non proliferation, and eventual ridding of nuclear weapons can ensure the safety of humanity.

Ethiopia in the past has been a strong advocate for nuclear weapon safety. Ethiopia strongly supported the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear (TPNW) though it didn’t sign the treaty. This treaty calls for the wide prohibition of nuclear weapons and actions using nuclear weapons. Ethiopia has also supported other measures against nuclear weapons such as the treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

Ethiopia hopes in this session of the Disarmament and International Security Committee to make the world safer from nuclear weapons. It advocates lasting measures against continued use, proliferation, and existence of nuclear weapons.

Works Cited
“Ethiopia – the World Factbook.” Www.cia.gov, www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/ethiopia/#military-and-security.
“Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor.” Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor, 2017, banmonitor.org/profiles/ethiopia.
Statement by a Representative of Ethiopia at the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the 11 Th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 2024, docs-library.unoda.org/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons_-Preparatory_Committee_for_the_Eleventh_Review_ConferenceSecond_session_(2024)/Ethiopia_GD_Statement_NPT.pdf.
“Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons | United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs.” Unoda.org, 2025, disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Saudi Arabia
Delegate Name: John Northrop

Country: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Delegate: John Northrop
Topic:

No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

The delegation of The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia acknowledges the United Nations non proliferation treaty ( NPT ) and actively supports keeping the world free of nuclear weapons. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia hopes to keep transparency with other member states and hopes to work with other middle eastern nations to introduce reductions of nuclear weapons. The Kingdom has also implemented regulations to reduce public access to fissile materials in order to prevent nuclear terrorism. Saudi Arabia believes in maintaining a middle east without nuclear weapons through treaties such as the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not produce WMD´s or any fissile material as of 2025.

First use policy has been increasingly controversial following the conflict in Ukraine in 2022. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia supports the implementation of a nuclear free Middle East with cooperation with other member states. This includes increased transparency and activism to keep the Middle East safer, and nations with nuclear weapons to adopt the ¨No first use¨ policy.

References:
https://docs.un.org/en/A/C.1/54/PV.25
https://www.icanw.org/saudi_arabia
https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html
https://www.arabnews.jp/en/business/article_130647/
https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2015/statements/pdf/SA_en.pdf?

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Iraq
Delegate Name: Sarath Badithala

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
The Republic of Iraq
Sarath Badithala
Forest Hills Eastern High School

The threat posed by nuclear weapons has been an issue that has been threatening global security since their very creation, specifically shown in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Throughout history, many agreements and treaties have been made governing the use of nuclear weapons; however, there are thousands of nuclear weapons still at hand in the arsenals of a handful of countries. The phrase “No First Use” refers to the pledge made by some nations on their use nuclear weapons first. The phrase means that the nations will not use nuclear weapons aggressively and will only use them in retaliation against another state. This pledge has significantly decreased tensions and helped reduce accidental escalation between countries. To combat problems that arise from nuclear weapons, the United Nations has acted in many different ways. Some ways that the United Nations has acted include passing treaties such as the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and and Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). However, many countries with nuclear arsenals have refused to adopt the No First Use policy, putting the world in danger of nuclear war.

Iraq strongly supports nuclear disarmament and advocates for a world free of nuclear weapons. Throughout Iraq’s history, the country has constantly endured instability and conflict, which has led to the country’s views on nuclear weapons. Iraq understands the massive, catastrophic consequences that nuclear weapons can have on countries, which is why the country has signed the NPT treaty that was issued by the United Nations. Iraq stays strong on its commitment to make the Middle East free of Nuclear weapons. The Iraqi government works with regional partners to advocate that nuclear weapons harm society. Iraq wants it to be made known to the entire world that, while nuclear weapons may produce a facade that leads nations to believe that they improve security. Nuclear weapons actually undermine security since nations start losing trust in each other. The Iraqi government tries to convey this message to other nations constantly through regional advocacy programs. Iraq believes that countries that currently have nuclear arsenals are responsible for slowly disassembling their nuclear weapons and heading towards a nuclear-weapon-free future. By supporting countries that are against nuclear weapons and initiatives presented by the United Nations, Iraq has demonstrated its commitment to advocating against nuclear weapons.

Iraq urges the world to go to a nuclear-free zone by implementing decisive solutions. Iraq proposes the creation of a working group that advocates against nuclear weapons in regional areas, starting in the Middle East, so that momentum can build up to eventually convince big players such as Russia and the United States. Another possible solution includes the creation of a verification committee that verifies the compliance of treaties made by nations. By combining diplomatic pressure on countries with nuclear arsenals and international checks and verifications, Iraq believes that the world can head towards a nuclear-free future.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Canada
Delegate Name: Mason Velie

Committee: Disarmament and International Security Committee
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Canada
School: Forest Hills Central High School

No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
In an age where a nuclear war between just 2 major powers could result in 2-5 billion deaths, nuclear security is vital to our survival as a species. As of 2025, No First Use policies (NFUs) have only been adopted by one country, leaving a further eight nuclear powers that do not have a policy. NFUs are defined by the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation as “…a commitment to not use nuclear weapons first.” The Center also stated that “An NFU policy would restrict when a president could consider using nuclear weapons,” which would undoubtedly help to prevent nuclear weapons being used as a result of rash decisions made by a single leader in a moment of weakness. Nuclear disarmament, another viable option for nuclear threat reduction, is defined by Merriam-Webster as “the process of reducing in number or completely eliminating a country’s nuclear weapons.” This course of action would also reduce the risk of a major nuclear conflict, with the Arms Control Association calling it, “a necessary step toward a world without nuclear weapons.”
Past UN treaties pertaining to nuclear weapon reduction and policy include the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban-Treaty, with the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons still open for signature. Canada voted for the first two, but has consistently voted against the final treaty. Currently, having consistently taken an anti-nuclear weapon stance, Canada is not in possession of any nuclear weapons, and, despite having access to the necessary technology, no plans are in place to build them.
Canada supports No First Use policies, as they are the most effective currently possible method of preventing future nuclear conflicts, and advises delegates to support NFUs that are brought to the committee. Canada remains neutral on nuclear disarmament, but encourages future discussion. Canada urges delegates to consider the problems arising from nuclear weapons and act to best prevent these potential issues from turning into reality.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Canada
Delegate Name: Mason Velie

GLIMUN-DISEC 2025
Committee: Disarmament and International Security Committee
Topic: Reducing the Recruitment Capabilities of Terrorist Groups
Country: Canada
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Terrorism has defined the 21st century, sparking wars and leaving death and destruction in its wake. Defined by Merriam-Webster as “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims,” terrorism has been a point of contention in global politics for decades. Terrorism, although it has been an issue for all of modern history, became more common in the early 1970s, with notable examples from pre-2000 being The Munich massacre and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. However, it was 2001 and the attacks on the Twin Towers when terrorism truly became a major global concern. Following these attacks, which were perpetrated by Al-Qaeda, groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS), Hamas, and Hizballah began forming in the Middle East, reliant on child soldiers even despite UN instruments including the CRC. Along with exploiting children, modern terrorists also use the internet to recruit new members, pushing their content upon an ever-growing amount of people through social media, some of which may be receptive to their messages. Current measures in place to slow terrorist recruitment include the aforementioned Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits child soldiers, and the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which aims to slow the spread of terrorism.
In 2012, Canada released the “Building Resilience Against Terrorism” strategy, helping government branches to “prevent, detect, deny and respond to terrorist threats.” Additionally, following the Air India flight 182 bombing, Canada started “The Kanishka Project,” which “provided research on terrorism-related issues,” helping to provide valuable methods of counter-terrorism. Since the turn of the century, Canada has taken a strong anti-terrorist stance, one that is unlikely to change in the coming years.
Canada urges delegates to do anything in their power to prevent terrorist groups from recruiting new members, suggesting the possibility of increasing online content regulations relating to terrorist groups and increasing enforcement of child protection instruments, possibly by imposing new restrictions or by increasing punishments for defying existing restrictions. Preventing terrorist groups from using children as soldiers and spreading their ideas on social media effectively eliminates their recruitment capabilities, and, according to the Handbook of Terrorism Prevention and Preparedness, “The long-term survival of terrorist organizations relies on their ability to attract new members and maintain an ongoing terrorist recruitment cycle,” meaning ending terrorist recruitment may result in ending terrorist groups all together. Canada condemns these groups atrocities, and hopes that the committee can come together to prevent them from destroying communities in the future.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Malaysia
Delegate Name: Calvin Hyun

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Federation of Malaysia
Calvin Hyun
Forest Hills Eastern High School

Nuclear Weapons have been a central problem to international securtity since their use in 1945. The pledge “No First Use” is made by countries that want to state that they will not use nuclear weapons aggressivley, and only in retaliation when other countries launch nuclear weapons at them. This pledge has long been debated by countries to be a possiblee solution that reduces tensions between countries which have nuclear arsenals. Nuclear Disarmament, has been central to the United Nations, since the organization has been trying to get countries to remove the nukes that they have in their arsenals. The UN tried to mitigat tensions with the NPT treaty, which largely reduced the number of countries that can get nuclear arsenals. The Federation of Malaysia advocates strongly for Nuclear disarmament, and consistently avoided having nuclear weapons and has instated NFU policies.

Malaysia has a clear stance on Nuclear Weapons, which is to end them. Although Malaysia is not directly under threat by a nuclear arsenal, the potential consequences from a nuclear war would affect all nations around the world, even the ones farther away from a conflict zone. Because of this, malysia strongly advocates against nuclear proliferation and believes that their disarmment is necessary for the security of mankind. Malaysia has actively worked on prohibiting Nuclear waepons, one way it did was by signing on to the TPNW treaty ( Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons). Malaysia strongly believes that all countries must adopt NFU policuies in order to have a secure future in which future generations aare not affected by nuclear weapons and international security is upheld and our planet does not get destroyed.

Looking foreward, Malaysia strongly believes that NFU policies and Nuclear Disarmament are the solutions t o ending Nuclear Weapons. Malaysia prippes the creation of new treaties that can please as many countries as possible, but inthe end cause Nuclear Weapons to be subtituted to less devastationg weapons of wra. Although Nuclear WEapons can be argued to help a nation’s security, it also true that their use can destroy multiple nations, and eventually the entire world. By combining the adoption of No First Use policies and the gradual reduction of nuclear stockpiles, the international community can take more steps into eventually becoming a nuke free world.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Portugal
Delegate Name: John Weaver

We all know the dangers of nuclear weapons. The destruction, the desecration, and death that follows in the wake of nuclear misuse. This is why as the nuclear proliferation crisis in the Middle East grows, Portugal has been stressing the importance of the IAEA and its related agencies. Portugal both politically and financially supports UNODA and UNIDIR. But disarmament is an issue that cannot be tackled through the current machinery. A full stage nuclear disarmament requires co-operation from multiple regions and states through a singular organisation that is multilateral and can work beyond borders.
This is why Portugal believes that to strengthen disarmament we must first promote co-operation between countries and multilateral approaches to this issue. Regional, national, and local institutions all need corresponding disarmament policies that focus on overcoming previous deadlocks in the machinery to create concrete solutions. The NPT is one of the best places to start in terms of preventing nuclear proliferation. It binds both nuclear capable and non nuclear capable countries to the peaceful use of fissionable materials and prevents the spread of nuclear capabilities from other countries.
But it is ultimately Portugal’s position that the current machinery to nuclear disarmament and the prevention of nuclear proliferation is inadequate. The new policies and machinery must have secure funding and be all inclusive. Portugal is concerned that the current committees involved are not as transparent and open as they need to be. Portugal is amongst the 15 countries rejected from the Conference on Disarmament even though it has applied for 3 consecutive years and been an observer of the conference since its creation in 1993. This presents us with the core of the issue. Without transparency and inclusive organisations or movements there can be no concrete resolutions with solid results and as such would ultimately fail. This is why international co-operation is the single most important action a country can take in nuclear disarmament and the prevention of nuclear proliferation.
Resources:
Alegre, Miguel. “Permanent Mission of Portugal to the UN .” First Committee (disarmament and interna, 27 Oct. 2025, New York
Alegre, Miguel. “Permanent Mission of Portugal to the UN .” First Committee (disarmament and interna, 28 Oct. 2025, New York,
Banmonitor.org/Portugal
icanw.org/portugal
UNGA Resolution 78/26 on «Promotion of multilateralism in the area
of disarmament and non-proliferation»

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Russian Federation
Delegate Name: Evan Gagliardo

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Russian Federation
Delegate Name: Evan Gagliardo

School: Forest Hills Central High School
Committee: DISEC

“The UN understands a nuclear weapon as a device that uses nuclear fission and/or fusion to cause an explosion with massive, destructive energy”(United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism). Ever since the Cold War, nuclear weapons have continued to be a rising issue, and with nine countries now estimated to have nuclear weapons available to deploy at any moment, the looming threat of nuclear warfare is a pressing concern for many countries, and many believe nuclear weapons should be eliminated. On the other hand, Russia firmly believes that a strong nuclear arsenal is essential for maintaining global sovereignty and stability, as Russia has the largest arsenal of nuclear power. Having a reserve of nuclear weapons is crucial in maintaining national security and deterring aggression that would threaten the Russian Federation or its allies, which is why Russia does not have a no-first-use policy. Possessing nuclear weapons also ensures that complete sovereignty is protected. Trying to limit or eliminate countries’ nuclear weapons is a radical breach of sovereignty, and total disarmament is not rational.
Over the years, the United Nations has made multiple attempts to get global nuclear disarmament/reduction and a global no-first-use policy, through multiple means, but they have failed to get every country on board, and Russia believes this is due to their radical approach to the problem at hand. One of the main initiatives the UN has put into play is the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). This treaty establishes limitations and prohibitions regarding nuclear activity, including but not limited to the promise not to develop, test, produce, acquire, possess, stockpile, use, or threaten to use nuclear weapons. The treaty also prohibits the deployment of nuclear weapons on national territory or the assistance of states with nuclear weapons. Finally, the treaty also requires states parties to provide adequate assistance to individuals affected by the use or testing of nuclear weapons, as well as to take necessary and appropriate measures of environmental remediation in areas under their jurisdiction or control contaminated as a result of activities related to the testing or use of nuclear weapons (United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs). Another measure proposed by the United Nations is the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). This is a treaty proposed by the UN that bans all nuclear weapon tests. Its purpose is to prevent the development of new nuclear weapons and limit the proliferation of existing ones, thereby protecting humanity and the environment from the harmful effects of nuclear testing. The treaty’s verification regime uses a global network of monitoring stations to detect any nuclear explosions. Although this treaty has not yet been put into place or passed, it is currently under consideration. Russia does not agree with either of these treaties, believing they are too radical and eliminate a state’s sovereignty, and are counterproductive to the problem because they contradict the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NP), which Russia is in support of. Russia also believes disarmament is a long-term goal that should be primarily controlled by the states in collaboration with other nuclear-armed states. Russia also believes unilateral disarmament is dangerous and does not provide enough security. Russia was one of the 19 countries that did not sign the TPNW.
The most significant treaty Russia is a signatory of is the previously mentioned NPT. The NPT includes three pillars: preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and pursuing nuclear disarmament. The Russian government states that it is necessary for the Russian government to have nuclear weapons for protection and deterrence, but is in favor of stopping the spread of them to other countries. Another treaty Russia is a part of is the New START treaty. This treaty is between the U.S and Russia, and the conditions of this treaty are that the countries can still deploy, but limit the numbers to what can be deployed, as well as mandate multiple inspections a year. Russia paused its commitment to this treaty due to the U.S not following the guidelines, but has not fully withdrawn and is resuming the treaty in 2026.
Moving into the future, Russia would like to see resolutions regarding no-first-use policies and nuclear disarmament be handled by individual states that contain nuclear weapons rather than the United Nations, because there is a high chance of a breach of sovereignty. Russia wants to limit the spread of nuclear weapons to other countries, but does not believe in unilateral disarmament and believes a gradual disarmament is best because Russia believes unilateral disarmament is counterproductive and a security threat.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Turkey
Delegate Name: Emily Chen

Country: Delegation of Türkiye
Committee: Disarmament and International Security Committee

Nuclear Disarmament and Policies

In August of 1945, the world saw firsthand the devastation caused by nuclear weapons, killing a quarter of a million civilians from the blast, and another 200,000 from radiation overdoses (United). Even those who were not killed by the blast or radiation either died from suffocation due to the firestorms that consume oxygen or suffered from severe burns from the thermal flash (The MIT). As a response to the tragedies that occurred in Japan, as well as World War II as a whole, the United Nations was created, and the call for the banning of nuclear weapon production and possession has been one of its main priorities. Since then, the UN has addressed the disarmament of nuclear weapons and the prohibition of production in various ways, the most recent being the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons or the TPNW (United). This treaty is the “first legally binding international agreement to prohibit its States Parties from developing, testing, producing, acquiring, possessing, stockpiling, using or threatening to use nuclear weapons” (United). Along with the TPNW, the UN has supported initiatives such as the Treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which calls for the prevention of the spread of nuclear weapons, and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test Ban Treaty or the CTBT, which bans “any nuclear weapon test explosion or any other nuclear explosion” anywhere in the world, regardless of the reason (United). Despite these resolutions, countries today are still producing and in possession of nuclear weapons. Currently, there are roughly 12,331 nuclear weapons in the world, all of which are in the possession of 9 countries. Just one of these nuclear weapons would wipe out an estimated 583,160 facilities if one were to be detonated over New York (Which). Along with these 9 nations, 6 are hosting nuclear weapons, and 28 endorse their use. None of these countries is a part of the TPNW, and only one holds a true “no first use” policy on the topic of nuclear weapons, while others have exceptions to this policy or simply do not acknowledge their arsenal (No).

As one of the 28 nations that endorse the use of nuclear weapons, Türkiye sees current and past resolutions as a way for non-nuclear states to stay militarily inferior to those who possess nuclear weapons. Türkiye has consistently voted against the annual resolution of adopting the TPNW and joined the United States, along with others, to protest the making of the TPNW. In 2016, Türkiye voted against the resolution that formally mandated states to commence negotiations on “a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination” (Türkiye). Türkiye also holds roughly 20 U.S B61 nuclear bombs at Incirlik Air Base (Nuclear). More recently, in 2019, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan criticized the idea that countries like “the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom could possess nuclear weapons while others, including Turkey, could not” and wishes to reduce, if not eliminate, the reliance on foreign military products (FAQ). Even with these views on nuclear weapons, Türkiye is not against the idea of nuclear disarmament, just not how it stands currently. Türkiye has shown support for the Australia-led Humanitarian Initiative that promotes nuclear disarmament by concentrating on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear war. This nation is also a member of the Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Initiative or the NPDI, a group of “non-nuclear weapon states dedicated to disarmament, nonproliferation, and peaceful nuclear activities”, along with the NPT, the Partial Test Ban Treaty or the PTBT, and ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, also known as the CTBT (Nuclear). Türkiye is not opposed to nuclear disarmament, but any plan that allows countries that already have a great amount of power to keep their nuclear power is one that Türkiye is firmly against. If the UN lets these countries keep their power, Türkiye is afraid for its safety, especially in the current political climate, and believes countries such as Türkiye should be allowed to possess their own arsenal as a defensive measure.

As it stands, the current resolutions are doing nothing to ensure the safety of those whose militaries are not as advanced as countries like the United States. Any plans that could bridge this gap, such as the TPNW, do not address this issue since those countries are not a part of this plan. The Delegation of Türkiye believes to hold accountability to the nuclear-weapon states, non-nuclear-weapon states, who wish to do so, should have the ability to possess their own nuclear weapons. To prevent the production of more nuclear weapons, the Delegation of Türkiye believes in the dispersing of existing weapons rather than making new ones. Countries that wish to receive nuclear weapons and own them must agree upon a “no first use” policy. This ensures no additional countries can use nuclear weapons as an offensive measure, while also allowing countries such as Türkiye to gain more independence militarily and powers such as the United States to decrease. It is unacceptable and dangerous for certain countries to be the only ones to be able to possess such weapons of destruction and then dictate who can and cannot have nuclear power. This power must be shared to ensure the balance of power and the accountability of the bigger powers.

Bibliography

“FAQ: Is Turkey the Next Nuclear Proliferate State?” Foundation for Defense of Democracies, 5 Feb. 2025, www.fdd.org/in_the_news/2025/02/05/faq-is-turkey-the-next-nuclear-proliferant-state/#:~:text=Turkey%20is%20a%20signatory%20to%20the%20Treaty,is%20not%20explicitly%20delineated%20in%20the%20NPT. Accessed 23 Nov. 2025.
“No First Use FAQs | Global Zero.” Global Zero, www.globalzero.org/no-first-use-faqs/index.html.
“Nuclear Disarmament Turkey.” Nuclear Threat Initiative, 8 Oct. 2024, www.nti.org/analysis/articles/turkey-nuclear-disarmament. Accessed 23 Nov. 2025.
The MIT Press Reader. “The Devastating Effects of Nuclear Weapons.” The MIT Press Reader, 11 Apr. 2024, thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/devastating-effects-of-nuclear-weapons-war.
“Türkiye.” International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, www.icanw.org/turkey. Accessed 23 Nov. 2025.
United Nations. “What Is Nuclear Disarmament? | United Nations.” United Nations, un.org/en/peace-and-security/what-nuclear-disarmament.
“Which Countries Have Nuclear Weapons?” International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, www.icanw.org/nuclear_arsenals. Accessed 23 Nov. 2025.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Guyana
Delegate Name: Colin Theobald

The Co-operative Republic of Guyana
Representative : DISEC Delegate – Colin Theobald
Nation : The Co-operative Republic of Guyana
Committee : Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC)
Topic : No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

The nation of Guyana holds a strong position against nuclear weapons. Particularly the first use policy of the few nuclear power nations. The humanitarian and consequential issues that would come from the use of nuclear weapons in warfare would be unimaginable. Millions would die, infrastructures would collapse, and it would be detrimental to the world as a whole. This is why the nation of Guyana has been a committed supporter of the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), considering how it was first to ratify it. The elimination of nuclear weapons as a whole is heavily pushed by the nation of Guyana. By disarming nuclear weapons, it could create stable relations among geopolitical negotiations.

By highlighting the humanitarian crisis that would follow a nuclear exchange, Guyana hopes to encourage nuclear powers to work together towards disarmament. By establishing TPNW as a beneficial solution, we can create a strengthened global norm against nuclear weaponizing. Another topic to consider is the reallocation of resources that go into making nuclear weapons. By redirecting the purpose for those technologies to beneficial factors instead of being weapons. By being weapons, it manifests the issue of robbing civilians of receiving useful developments in societies. Nuclear weapons are a looming threat to humanity as a whole. Nuclear energy on the other hand can be beneficial for society.

The nation of Guyana has created support for disarmament and diversion of resources of nuclear weapons. Working with international organizations to achieve these goals. Guyana has supported efforts to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula. Guyana will continue its valiant efforts towards bringing these powers together and reaching a solution to the burden of nuclear weapons and the leftovers from the tense era of the Cold War.

Resources :
Welcome to the United Nations
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
OPANAL
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Cooperative Republic of Guyana
UNDOCS

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Nigeria
Delegate Name: James Zawacki

The Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Polices and Nuclear Disarmament
Federal Republic of Nigeria
James Zawacki
Forest Hills Eastern High School

Nuclear weapons and atomic weapons are indiscriminate and have the opportunity to cause unmatched suffering and Devastation to other nations and populations, regardless of whether they are at the target or not. Furthermore, only a select few states possess these destructive powers, leading others to feel threatened by the prospect of destruction if caught in the crossfire. It’s the smaller developing countries that face entering the growing world; it will be impossible to maintain mutually assured destruction with new emerging conflicts day by day. The Federal Republic of Nigeria is deeply concerned with the threat of such arms, as it is committed to supporting world peace/security, and economic development. The United Nations has taken action to create new resolutions and treaties, but has ultimately fallen short, as many states holding on to such arms have not ratified them. The United Nations has seen some success in treaties such as the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty and the Partial Test Ban Treaty. But to truly reach a no-first-use policy and nuclear disarmament, the UN will have to get large countries in possession of arms on board.

Nigeria recognizes the need for action to be taken on the conflict of nuclear disarmament and the development of no-first-use policies in order to prevent unethical and heated tensions. Nigeria has strived towards disarmament in the past through the ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which prohibits the development, testing, production, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons. Nigeria was among the original 50 states parties to the treaty when it entered into force on 22 January 2021. Furthermore, Nigeria has shown its support by playing a key role in the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty CTBT. Nigeria is also recognized for being a participating member of initiatives like the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Treaty of Pelindaba), which is known for prohibiting the research, development, manufacturing, stockpiling, acquisition, testing, possession, or control of nuclear weapons. Nigeria does not implicitly support “no first use” but instead opts for the total elimination of nuclear arms, with many leaders calling for the elimination due to strong humanitarian ties, as the impact is the largest on such groups. Nigeria urges all states, especially those with nuclear arms and weapons, to take measures or movement towards disarmament and to promote less availability.

The Federal Republic of Nigeria urges the United Nations to take action to reduce or eliminate the use, stockpiling, and production of nuclear arms. Some major room for improvement comes specifically from production. Nigeria proposes that more regulations and moderation be put on the global production of materials used in weapons, as well as converting nuclear facilities to have more peaceful uses. Nigeria supports the total elimination of nuclear arms over the implementation of the No First Use policy, as even regulated arms still pose a threat and raise tensions.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Nigeria
Delegate Name: James Zawacki

Disarmament and International Security Committee
Reducing the Recruitment Capabilities of Terrorist Groups
Federal Republic of Nigeria
James Zawacki
Forest Hills Eastern High School

The highest ranking point of interest falls under the topic of recruitment. An unfortunate fact of the matter is that issues such as poor education, lack of opportunity in the labor market, human rights violations, and communal isolation are driving factors that push individuals toward extremism. Now more than ever, it is important to find ways to mitigate human rights violations and socioeconomic problems that push recruitment for terrorist organizations. However, it is also worth noting that social media and education play a significant role in promoting recruitment and educating others about recruitment methods. The United Nations strongly advocates for a “comprehensive approach encompassing not only security-based counterterrorism measures,” but also for solutions to the underlying conditions that drive recruits to join these recruitment agencies. The United Nations has addressed this issue in the past by launching the CT Tech initiative, aimed at strengthening the capabilities of Law enforcement and criminal justice authorities in countering terrorist organizations and recruitment centers, which launched in 2022. Unfortunately, new regulations and expansions of such policies need to be deliberated on further to adapt to the new and changing strategies of Recruitment and world technology.

The Federal Republic of Nigeria recognizes the immediate need for protection and action to reduce the recruitment numbers of terrorist organizations and their capabilities through the use of technology and other forms of communication commonly used for recruitment. Nigeria has counterterrorism legal frameworks such as the Terrorist Prevention Act, which aims to secure identity and prepare against threats. This policy delves into the roots of extreme terrorism by adopting a comprehensive societal approach, promoting collaboration among civil society, leaders, and stakeholders. Nigeria is now more relevant than ever in the field of terrorism, as indices from 2024 indicate that Nigeria is ranked 8th in the world for terrorism deaths, with 565 deaths recorded from terrorist activity. But this number is on the rise as Global rankings place them about sixth as of 2025. The majority of these terrorist threats come from militant religious groups and criminal gangs, which are often divided by the underlying issues of poverty and socioeconomic inequality. Nigeria has worked in tandem with the UN and other organizations, such as the African Union, to help counteract the surge of terrorism. This includes topics and plans such as the road map to “Silence the Guns by 2030”.Nigeria has also passed Laws such as the Cybercrimes Act of 2015, which is a framework that criminalizes the use of the internet for purposes such as terrorism.

The Federal Republic of Nigeria urges the United Nations to take more action and invest more resources in combating terrorist organizations and recruitment centers through the use of new technology and improved education/information about these organizations. Nigeria recommends addressing the root of the cause, that being inequality and social unrest, as well as promoting more awareness about organizations. This could help developing countries and developed countries more accurately identify and locate sources of terrorist Behavior. By achieving Nigeria’s goals, terrorism could meet a low not just in its own country but all around the world, fortifying and protecting them from Terror.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Republic of Korea
Delegate Name: Abigail Kearney

In a world of skyrocketing urbanization and population density, nuclear and indiscriminate weapons pose greater threats to civilian life than ever before. There are nine countries with nuclear weapons, and an estimated 12,000+ nuclear warheads. The power of a single warhead is enough to cause over half a million casualties and fallout for hundreds of miles. Increasing geopolitical tensions pushes relevance of nuclear devastation to new heights, and places immense concern on the creation and testing of nuclear weapons.

The prevention of deadly use of nuclear weapons following no first use strategies must be considered as a diplomatic avenue, allowing the retention of nuclear weapons as a tool for defense only. This eliminates pathways for nuclear attack following fracturing geopolitics, and maintains security and safety for civilians, providing protection and assurance that dissuades public fear. For these reasons, the Republic of Korea recommends the ratification of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by any and all UN members, including those currently in possession of nuclear weapons. The NPT functions on the several main pillars including non-proliferation, disarmament, and the right to develop nuclear energies. Non-proliferation effectively limits the ability of member states to trade and create nuclear arsenals. Disarmament, an important factor in disposing of nuclear weapons, can only function with the ratification and agreement of all nuclear states. Therefore, an increase in diplomacy and global cooperation is a prerequisite to any conversation involving nuclear weapons. The right to develop nuclear energy remains important as nuclear energy enhances technological efficiency and provides climate-safe alternatives to traditional power sources.

To create a world in which global peace becomes the standard, and citizens can feel secure, action must be taken to reduce the use and development of nuclear weapons. The Republic of Korea encourages the consideration of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as a solution to growing global concerns about nuclear weapon stockpiling and stresses the need for unified action to ratify and follow the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Ukraine
Delegate Name: Tejasvi Annadurai

Disarmament and International Security Committee
No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Ukraine
Tejasvi Annadurai
Forest Hills Northern

Since the beginning of the atomic age, nuclear weapons have personified both the pinnacle of destructive capability and the greatest threat to the survival of humanity. Since the dropping of nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world has lived with a constant shadow of mutual destruction, thus promoting several decades of treaties and activism directed at obtaining nuclear disarmament. However, to this day, and notwithstanding efforts through arrangements such as the NPT and the New START Treaty, there remain over 12,000 nuclear warheads in stockpiles worldwide. At the same time, only a few states, notably China and India, retain formal “No First Use” policies, while others continue to retain the right to nuclear preemption. The resulting geopolitical instability, coupled with the modernization of nuclear arsenals, underscores the urgent need for verifiable disarmament and credible NFU commitments that can restore global trust and prevent escalation.

Ukraine holds a unique and morally significant position on this issue. Upon gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine inherited the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal from the dissolved Soviet Union. In 1994, Ukraine made the historic decision to give up all nuclear weapons, acceding to the NPT as a non-nuclear-weapon state in return for security assurances provided through the Budapest Memorandum signed by the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Russian Federation. Those assurances were to protect Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity; however, subsequent violations of that memorandum have highlighted the insufficiency of non-binding guarantees and the danger of relying solely on good faith. Ukraine’s experience serves both as a cautionary and inspiring precedent, a proof of commitment to global disarmament, but also a warning that such disarmament should be matched by enforceable international mechanisms that protect non-nuclear states from coercion and aggression.

Ukraine urges the international community to follow a balanced and pragmatic path towards universal No First Use adoption and nuclear disarmament. Ukraine suggests the establishment, under the auspices of the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs and the International Atomic Energy Agency, of a United Nations No First Use Confidence and Verification Framework, aiming at transparency, inspections, and mutual accountability among the states adopting NFU pledges. Further, Ukraine supports phasing in de-alerting nuclear weapons in order to reduce the risks of accidental launches and promotes a Multilateral Disarmament Incentive Fund to provide financial and technical assistance to the states for safe dismantling, material conversion, and economic transition. Finally, Ukraine calls upon forming under the auspices of the United Nations Security Council a Security for Disarmament Mechanism that shall link verified disarmament actions to binding multilateral security guarantees. As a country that has voluntarily given up its nuclear arsenal for the sake of peace, Ukraine states once again that disarmament without security is not sustainable and that a future free of nuclear threats requires both moral will and enforceable international law.

Works Cited:
“Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones” United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/nuclear-weapon-free-zones
“Nuclear Disarmament Ukraine” Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/ukraine-nuclear-disarmament/
“New START Treaty Overview” U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/new-start/
“Statement on the 30th Anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. December 2024. https://mfa.gov.ua
“No First Use Policy Brief” Global Zero. https://www.globalzero.org
“Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons” United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs.https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuclear-weapons/treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons
“Ukraine Country Profile” CIA World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/ukraine/

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: South Africa
Delegate Name: Isla Bakker

Country: South Africa
Delegate: Isla Bakker
School: Williamston
Committee: DISEC
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

Being one of the few countries globally to have developed nuclear weapons and voluntarily give them up, South Africa, during the late 20th century, built a small nuclear arsenal and then chose to dismantle it before the end of apartheid. The country joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1991, being in the state of a non-nuclear-weapon state. They have remained to promote peace, transparency, and responsible international cooperation since then. In modern times, South Africa is a strong supporter of nuclear disarmament; it believes nuclear weapons are not only a threat to global peace but a threat to humanity. Due to its unique history, South Africa delivers a meaningful perspective to the issue and shows that complete disarmament is possible with the needed authorities and an international trust system.

South Africa has played an active, crucial role in supporting global efforts towards building a world wih an absence of nuclear weapons. After the deconstruction of their nuclear program, their country became the first nation to voluntarily destroy all of its nuclear weapons. Not only were they the first to get rid of them, but they were also the only nation to do so. The Treaty on the Non-Profiling of Nuclear Weapons is strongly supported to consistently advocate for all nuclear-armed states to fully commit to disarmament. South Africa has also helped promote and negotiate the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. “No First Use” policies are important steps for South Africa when building the premises of trust between countries, and they regularly encourage nuclear powers to adopt such policies to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict, whether it be accidental or intentional. South Africa continues to speak out in the United Nations for fairness, accountability, and a world where security is not based on weapons of mass corruption.

Looking ahead, South Africa schemes to continue pushing towards a powerful global collaboration on nuclear disarmament. The delegation believes that states that remain nuclear-armed need to take real, measurable steps towards diminishing and eventually completely removing their arsenals. They believe the United Nations should help create clear timelines and verification systems to inch towards this goal. South Africa supports the encouragement of “No First Use” commitments amongst nuclear powers, which will reduce tensions and build trust in regions, along with long-standing rivalries. The country hopes to strengthen partnerships with advocacy groups and international organizations to educate the world about the dangers within nuclear weapons. While there are no longer nuclear capabilities in South Africa, they will continue to advocate for global security so that around the world, everyone will feel safe enough to move towards complete disarmament. By promoting transparency, strong national agreements, and peaceful diplomacy, South Africa aims to help create a future where nuclear weapons are no longer a threat to humanity.

Nuclear Disarmament South Africa
South Africa | Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Kazakhstan
Delegate Name: Remy Jorgensen

Country: Kazakhstan
Delegate: Remy Jorgensen
School: Williamston High School
Committee: DISEC
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

One very pressing issue in the world is nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons have a reputation for being ruthless and not caring about life. One well-known example is the Hiroshima bombing on August 6, 1945, which was the first ever use of a nuclear weapon. Some background on the topic is that the U.N. has already made an attempt at lowering the amount of nuclear activity by making the United Nations on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). The TPNW, which in summary means developing, testing, producing, manufacturing, acquiring, possessing, or stockpiling nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices.

Kazakhstan is the world leader in nuclear disarmament and has supported it for a long time. Firstly, Kazakhstan has contributed to nuclear disarmament by turning over all of its Soviet-era nuclear weapons to the Russian Federation by April 1995. Also, in 1991, Kazakhstan closed down its main nuclear test site, which was located in Semipalatinsk. Finally, Kazakhstan has signed the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program and is also the only Soviet successor to sign the TPNW. Kazakhstan is also a major leader and participant in the Steppe Organization for Peace.

Kazakhstan’s plan is to advocate for the complete ban of nuclear weapons by the year 2045. Although the U.N. does not have the power to force countries to give up their nuclear weapons, since the U.N. relies on voluntary treaties and the cooperation of countries. Finally, countries like Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan would most likely agree since they are Kazakhstan’s neighbors and they are also signatories on the TPNW. Also, countries like Japan would agree with Kazakhstan because they are also signatories on TPNW, and they have learned from WWII the nuclear bombs are not funny or something to mess with.

Sources
www.nti.org
www.un.org

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: South Africa
Delegate Name: Melanie Milam

Country: South Africa
Delegate: Melanie Milam
School: Williamston
Committee: DISEC
Topic: No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament

Being one of the few countries globally to have developed nuclear weapons and voluntarily give them up, South Africa, during the late 20th century, built a small nuclear arsenal and then chose to dismantle it before the end of apartheid. The country joined the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1991, being in the state of a non-nuclear-weapon state. They have remained to promote peace, transparency, and responsible international cooperation since then. In modern times, South Africa is a strong supporter of nuclear disarmament; it believes nuclear weapons are not only a threat to global peace but a threat to humanity. Due to its unique history, South Africa delivers a meaningful perspective to the issue and shows that complete disarmament is possible with the needed authorities and an international trust system.

South Africa has played an active, crucial role in supporting global efforts towards building a world wih an absence of nuclear weapons. After the deconstruction of their nuclear program, their country became the first nation to voluntarily destroy all of its nuclear weapons. Not only were they the first to get rid of them, but they were also the only nation to do so. The Treaty on the Non-Profiling of Nuclear Weapons is strongly supported to consistently advocate for all nuclear-armed states to fully commit to disarmament. South Africa has also helped promote and negotiate the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. “No First Use” policies are important steps for South Africa when building the premises of trust between countries, and they regularly encourage nuclear powers to adopt such policies to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict, whether it be accidental or intentional. South Africa continues to speak out in the United Nations for fairness, accountability, and a world where security is not based on weapons of mass corruption.

Looking ahead, South Africa schemes to continue pushing towards a powerful global collaboration on nuclear disarmament. The delegation believes that states that remain nuclear-armed need to take real, measurable steps towards diminishing and eventually completely removing their arsenals. They believe the United Nations should help create clear timelines and verification systems to inch towards this goal. South Africa supports the encouragement of “No First Use” commitments amongst nuclear powers, which will reduce tensions and build trust in regions, along with long-standing rivalries. The country hopes to strengthen partnerships with advocacy groups and international organizations to educate the world about the dangers within nuclear weapons. While there are no longer nuclear capabilities in South Africa, they will continue to advocate for global security so that around the world, everyone will feel safe enough to move towards complete disarmament. By promoting transparency, strong national agreements, and peaceful diplomacy, South Africa aims to help create a future where nuclear weapons are no longer a threat to humanity.

Nuclear Disarmament South Africa
South Africa | Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: France
Delegate Name: Olivia Sokol

Country: France
Delegate: Olivia Sokol
School: Williamston High School
Committee: General Assembly: DISEC
Topic: Nuclear Disarmament

The pressing threat of nuclear warfare at times of war has sparked controversy whether nuclear warfare is justified. Nuclear weapons pose a significant threat to world peace and can destroy societies and populations upon impact. With the institution of nuclear disarmament, it decreases the threats, and reallocates military spending to other areas of need. However total disarmament has not been achieved. There have been several inflictions that countries have put forth to motivate the spread of disarmament, one of them being a No-First-Use policy implemented by China, and others like the Treaty of the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. However, it is stressed that there is not the guarantee of complete elimination, and the United Nations need to see change.

France is one of the nine countries that houses nuclear weapons within its borders, it is also the only European Union member to possess independent non-NATO nuclear weapons. France possesses 300 total weapons, 290 which are operational. Since 2018, France has consistently voted against the ratification of the Treaty of Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW); France states that the claims made by the treaty do not contribute to the development of international law, and that it does not reflect the increasingly challenging international security nor does it align with the Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. France will continue to vote against the treaty and will encourage other countries to do so as well. Despite voting against the treaty, France has put forth several nuclear disarmament policies. France not only completely dominated its ground-to-ground nuclear components by 2008, it also voluntarily reduced one-third of its missile-launching nuclear submarines in service. They are also under the legal obligation to pursue global disarmament under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

France would like to continue to enhance the spread of promoting nuclear disarmament. They have already reduced the size of their arsenal significantly, so France is likely unwilling to further reduce it based on maintaining national security. For the future, the country is in support of negotiating a verifiable Fissile Material Cut Off Treaty, and they will adhere to the idea that nuclear disarmament must be done in the context of general and complete disarmament. Even though France does keep an independent arsenal, they would still like to continue cooperation with countries like the United Kingdom (under the Northwood Declaration) and the United States.

Sources:
https://www.icanw.org/france

Nuclear Disarmament France

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Indonesia
Delegate Name: Luke Harkema

Country: Indonesia
Delegate: Luke
School: Williamston High School
Committee: General Assembly: DISEC
Topic: Nuclear Disarmament

Nuclear weapons are the largest threat to the safety of all people worldwide. A full-scale nuclear war could kill billions, so the adoption and continued success of a nuclear disarmament plan is vital to the continued existence of humanity. Although only five countries are formally recognized as having nuclear arms, several others possess them, all with differing levels of disarmament. China is the only country with a true “No First Use” policy, while others have only limited disarmament from the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). Though there have been some promising developments such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons which prohibits the transfer of nuclear weapons between ratifying members, and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons where no new nuclear weapons are created by ratifying members, these agreements have not been signed by any countries that possess nuclear weapons, leaving disarmament policies up to themselves.

Indonesia is highly motivated to reach an agreement that stops the use and possession of nuclear weapons for all countries. With Java being the most densely populated island in the world, Indonesia is at a massive risk to nuclear weapons. In December 2024, Indonesia signed and ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, with their Minister of Foreign Affairs saying, “the possession and use of nuclear weapons cannot be justified for any reason”. Indonesia has been an active participant in UN meetings calling for the complete and total elimination of nuclear weapons.

Indonesia’s future plans to resolve this issue continue to be the complete eradication of nuclear weapons. The removal of nuclear weapons creates a safer planet for all people, without the risk of a catastrophic disaster. Indonesia proposes that the power five nations (China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US) sign SEANFWZ, which aims to keep Southeast Asia a nuclear-free zone. Indonesia will support any bills that lead to the destruction of nuclear weapons, and will work closely with other countries that have ratified the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to accomplish this. Indonesia wants more countries to sign this treaty, especially states that possess nuclear arms, in order to make the world a safer place.

https://www.icanw.org/indonesia?

Indonesia Calls for Nuclear Weapons Total Elimination

https://en.antaranews.com/news/346217/indonesia-advocates-for-new-nuclear-weapon-free-zones?

https://en.antaranews.com/news/382857/indonesia-urges-nuclear-disarmament-at-un-meeting?

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Italy
Delegate Name: Tillee Woods

Country: Italy
Delegate: Tillee Woods
School: Williamston High School
Committee: DISEC
Topic: No First Use Policy and Nuclear Disarmament

Since the United States first used the nuclear bomb against Japan in 1945, the question was raised about what to do with the technology. While some people consider nuclear weapons as dangerous technology that should be eradicated, others consider it vital for the security of nations that possess it. During the arms race of the Cold War, several treaties went into effect to limit the two superpower’s access to nuclear weapons. The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT I) led to the creation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, which limited missile defense to 200, then 100 receptors. SALT I also banned the creation of new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). In 1994, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty I (START I) was put into force and was the first treaty that forced the US and USSR to significantly reduce the amount of nuclear weapons they had. SALT II was discussed and it would make a limit on the amount of nuclear weapons they possessed and completely get rid of ICBMs. Although this treaty never went into force, the spirit of arms reduction continues to this day.

Italy currently holds 35 nuclear weapons belonging to the US military in the Aviano Air Base and the Ghedi Air Base. Due to Italy’s affiliation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Italy believes that it should be allowed to retain the nuclear weapons it stores for the US. Italy has refused to sign or ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) and has continuously voted against GA resolutions to ratify it. However, over 100 Italian cities express support for the TPNW. A YouGov poll conducted in 2020 showed that 87% of Italians believed that their country should join the TPNW. Due to the pressure of Italian cities, the Italian parliament created a resolution saying that it would consider the TPNW, and revived that resolution in 2023. In a speech delivered to the GA in 2024, Italy said that NATO’s nuclear-sharing policy was in line with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which Italy ratified in 1975. The Italian government also claimed that it would attend meetings for TPNW states, which it has not.

Italy believes that, as long as there are nuclear weapons, they should only be used for defense and to prevent war. Italy has expressed concern about the gradual collapse of disarmament efforts and feels that Russia is responsible for it. Due to this, Italy will support countries that chose disarmament, and even support legislation that strengthens the call to disarmament. In the future, Italy will continue looking into the possibility of joining the TPNW while considering its beliefs on NATO membership and international safety. While Italy does not agree in total nuclear disarmament, it does agree with not using nuclear weapons. Italy will continue in its belief that nuclear weapons can be helpful in preventing war, and will help to make sure that other nations understand the dangers of nuclear weapons and why they should not be used.

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Argentina
Delegate Name: Melanie Milam

Country: Argentina
Committee: DISEC
Topic: Nuclear First-Use Policies & Nuclear Disarmament
Delegate: Melanie Milam
School: Williamston Highschool

The issue of nuclear first use policies and nuclear disarmament remains one of the most significant threats to international peace and security. A first use policy allows a nation to launch nuclear weapons before being attacked, sending countries down a slippery slope. Since the cold war the presence of nuclear arsenals has created instability and despite progress thousands of active warheads still remain. The United Nations play an essential role in establishing global norms that discourage nuclear escalations and promote transparency. Due to the fact that nuclear weapons have devastating effects on humans, environments, and tremendous economic consequesnes as they can cause mass casualties, long term radiation, and desctruction of infastructure. Argentina, along with other Latin American natitions has prioritized peace through international agreements such as the Treaty of Tlateloco which established a nuclear weapon free zone in the region.

Argentina has a long history of supporting nonproliferation. As a signatory on the Treaty on the NonProliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Argentina is committed to preventing the spread o nuclwar arms, while promoting the safe developmeny of civillian nuclear programs. Argentina also closly cooperates with the internatioal Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure monitoring and verification of any and all nuclear activitys. Domestically, nuclear tecnology is strictly used for peaceful purposes like energy production, medicine, and research. Argentina history demonstrated commitment to diplomacy, advocationg for the reductions of arsenals through negotiation rather than conflict. Current international discussions on nuclear rick reduction and disarment treaties ramain alighed with our position fully supporting global security.

Looking forward, Argentina supports creating a global “No first use” rule so that no country can use nuclear weapons before being attacked. This would make the world much safer and significantly reduce the chance of nuclear conflict. Argentina also believes that the IAEA shoiuld have stronger tools to check nuclear programs to help build trust between nations. Argentina reconized that the United Nations should diplomacy to handle nuclear threats and issues while also respecting national soverignity for everybody. Argentina plans to work with countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Germany, and South Africa to promote diararment and encourage safter nuclear power.

THE STORY OF ARGENTINA’S NUCLEAR POLICYJames Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studieshttps://www.nonproliferation.org › npr › carasa64
https://www.icanw.org/argentina
Treaty of TlatelolcoWelcome to the United Nationshttps://www.un.org › nwfz › content › treaty-tlatelolco
Nuclear Power in ArgentinaWorld Nuclear Associationhttps://world-nuclear.org › country-profiles › countries-a-f
Statement-Argentina-Translation.pdf
Argentina

Topic: 2025 – No First Use Policies and Nuclear Disarmament
Country: Central African Republic
Delegate Name: Elisabeth Ver Steeg

Nuclear weapons are indiscriminate and have the power to destroy life as we know it. One
nuclear conflict could mean the end of life for everyone. The nuclear fallout of these weapons can kill anything in its path. Because of these threats, countries and activists have sought to limit the spread and use of nuclear weapons since their first use in conflict. The implementation of No First Use Policies would ease existing tensions between rival nuclear-armed countries, such as the US and Russia. Along with easing the world’s fears on North Korea’s arsenal of nuclear weapons…

The Central African Republic has made strides to enact No First Use Policies. It is a part of the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty, also known as the Pelindaba Treaty. The treaty prohibits CAR from researching, manufacturing, or stockpiling nuclear weapons. In 2017, the country signed the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW); however, it has neither ratified nor enforced this legislation. Even though the country has made an effort to disarm nuclear weapons, the country also has a feeble central government and has little ability to enforce such legislation.

Due to CAR’s long history of human rights abuses, the UN Security Council placed an arms
embargo on the country in 2013, which included nuclear arms. The embargo has since been relaxed because the country signed a peace treaty with non-state armed groups within the country in 2019. In 2026, the embargo will be lifted. The country is not likely to be a target of or participate in nuclear warfare, but it is worth noting that the country’s weak infrastructure, food insecurity, and political instability would exacerbate a nuclear conflict. The country would not be able to handle the nuclear fallout, nor the civil unrest of a nuclear attack.

The Central African Republic has limited ability to uphold domestic legislation, but it would be open participating in global treaties addressing the issues. It’s strong ties to Russia could possibly limit the country’s say in the treaties, but that may not matter in relation to the life and death seriousness of the matter.

Position papers for GLIMUN 2025 will appear above this line, with the newest being at the top.