Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Argentina
Delegate Name: Colin Murphy
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Argentina has been a peaceful country for decades and we have done it without weapons of mass destruction (WMD). We have been a proponent of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) for twenty years now and we have also acceded to the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) making us a non-nuclear weapon state. We harness the power of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, not acts of terrorism. We have been subject to acts of terrorism, and if these terrorists would have possessed WMD the results would had been catastrophic.

Efforts by both the UN and individual states need to escalate if WMD or WMD components are to be better secured. With extra efforts, WMD will be able to be secured, monitored, and it will prevent any extremist groups from seizing and operating them. Individuals states need to either increase security and monitoring of WMD stockpiles, or they must destroy the stockpiles that they cannot better secure. It would be up to the international community to set standards for security of these stockpiles. Any state not able to meet these standards should give their WMD to the UN for proper disposal.

If the international community wants to have a chance at stopping trafficking of WMD, then border control, especially where terrorists groups are copious, needs to greatly increase. Individual states cannot let extremist groups move freely between borders. If states cannot stop this, then the responsibility will have to be taken up by the international community. The international community must make it impossible for WMD to be acquired by terrorist groups if they want some sort of world peace. If any terrorist group acquires WMD, it can target any country thus making it an international problem to be dealt with utmost seriousness and significance. WMD only make tensions rise, make tempers flare, and kill innocent people.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Australia
Delegate Name: Tristan Long
School: Saline High School

Australia is in good standing to the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Convention. Australia works to further the objectives of these conventions. Australia supports worldwide efforts to regulate the biological and chemical industries and protect the supply chains that make sources of these materials vulnerable to theft and misuse. Australia plays an active role in this process in Southeast Asia where it has administered training and guidance in the industries that produce materials that could be used for destructive purposes. The relatively recent incidents in Syria have created a greater focus on the issue of terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction, and Australia’s position on the problem is similar to the rest of the UN’s. Like most other Western nations, Australia believes without a doubt, after through investigations by UN officials within the borders of Syria, that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on its citizens. The issue that is the focus of this committee is whether or not these weapons are vulnerable to extremist groups within the borders of Syria that would use them in terror operations if the Assad regime fails to protect the weapons. Australia along with the vast majority of the world believes that it is imperative that the Syrian government places these weapons under the control of UN groups and more stable governments that could safely carry out the process of disposing of the weapons. Until this occurs, foreign military action against the Assad regime is believed to be dangerous by Australia because it would weaken the government’s capability to protect its chemical arsenal from rebel groups.

The other issue whose attention has been diminished by the Syrian conflict is the ease by which nuclear materials can be acquired by those who would use them in ways that would damage international security. Australia is playing an important role preventing this from occurring in its immediate region by regulating industries that transport, use, and produce nuclear materials in Southeast Asia. The largest threat however, is the lack of security in many ex-Soviet states that possess large amounts of waste and material from the remnants of the Soviet Union’s nuclear arsenal. Many of these materials are already unaccounted for, and there have been several instances of theft in recent years.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Austria
Delegate Name: Emma McNorton
School: Royal Oak High School

The terrorist organizations of today travel through unsatisfactory and sometimes criminal ways of obtaining information, weapons, targets, and even support. Austria believes this is unacceptable. We think the most pertinent place to start reforming these practices is to cut off the terrorist’s access to the deadliest weapons of all, Weapons of Mass destruction. Austria believes these weapons have no place in the civilized world we livein. These weapons do not only affect the designated target, but also the environment in the proximity of the target and the world. The end does not, in Austria’s opinion, justify the means, and that is why as a peaceful and diplomatic nation we urge this committee to discuss the ways the terrorists obtain unlawful weapons of mass destruction, the option of launching more investigations into terrorist cells, and to discuss known groups to have these weapons already in their possession. We propose that the UN impose new laws regarding weapons bans, and also limits of the production and trade of these deadly weapons.

Austria does not have any allies and we maintain a strictly neutral state. There are countries however who have held the same views as us in the past and we are eager to see where they stand on the issues at hand. We are opening minded to resolutions and changes of opinion, but we will not falter on our views that wmd are detrimental to society and should under no circumstances be treated lightly and acquired easily by terrorists and governments alike.

Austria, being a pillar for the furthering of nuclear technologies, and home of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), is a proponent of the positive uses of nuclear technology. We urge the UN to not put such a harsh connotation with nuclear advancements, for they do not all end in tragic loss of life, but innovations that will better the world in which we all live.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Bangladesh
Delegate Name: Liam O’Sullivan
School: Fishers High School

The People’s Republic of Bangladesh recognizes the threat of weapons of mass destruction and calls for an international effort to disarm nations in possession of them and/or discourage their heinous use, as they not only affect the military personnel that they are aimed at, but civilian populations that must bear the consequences of their home country’s actions. Bangladesh detests weapons of mass destruction especially because of how densely populated our nation is. Given our history of being near large scale conflicts, such as the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan, Bangladesh is wary of newer, more lethal methods of warfare, and any type that does not discriminate between soldier and civilian; friend or foe.

In the past, Bangladesh has not had the opportunity to take action against weapons of mass destruction, but its allies in the United States have. In 2003 president George Bush of the United States responded to claims of the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and acted on them, beginning a war against that nation in the interest of disarming them. While attempts to disarm nations need not necessarily turn into an international dispute, the need for the disposal of these items is apparent. Doing so would be an extremely effective preventive measure in limiting the loss of life in future warfare. However, the extent of the measures the United Nations can take must be kept in check by recognition of national sovereignty, as unnecessary probing makes for poor diplomacy. The utmost discretion in dealing with these matters would also be welcome, as we are sure the international community would attest to after the result of the 2003 war.

To combat this issue, a separate international court should be established in order to properly oversee disarmament, prosecute abuses of weapons of mass destruction, and place laws and restrictions on development of new large-scale munitions in the future. However, to avoid bias the court will cycle through various qualified judges of various nations who do not openly or discretely hold any form of the weapons of mass destruction. Other efforts must be made, encouraging citizens to get behind an international effort to restrict the numbers of and use of weapons of mass destruction because ultimately, it is the people of the world who will pay the price for the use of weapons of mass destruction. Additionally, more emphasis should be placed in countries in risk of chemical attacks on neutralizing potential threats. This might avert another crisis like the sarin gas attack in Tokyo, 1995.

Geneva Protocol

http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Chemical/

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/229055/Geneva-Protocol-on-Gas-Warfare

2003 Invasion of Iraq

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/343870/why-did-we-invade-iraq-victor-davis-hanson

1995 Tokyo Sarin Gas attack

http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0320.html

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Bolivia
Delegate Name: Annika Gurrola
School: Mattawan High School

Bolivia would like to, first, recognize the issue of weapons of mass destructions (WMD) is detrimental to the safety and well-being of all nations.The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) recognizes WMD as threats to global prosperity and security. In July of 1999, Bolivia, along with neighboring nations, signed a political declaration that regards these nations as, "zone(s) of peace, free of weapons of mass destruction" (U.S. Department of State). Bolivia sees the issue as something that must be addressed in all nations for the purpose of securing peace.

In 2006, Bolivia requested aid to detect and monitor weapons of mass destruction through the use of offices and vehicles. Addressing the problem, Bolivia is working with larger entities to present its country with the resources necessary for protection against WMD. Bolivia is a nation rich with national sovereignty and wishes to strengthen the effort towards peace without impeding on any nation's conceived notions.

In regard to the issue of preventing terrorists from acquiring such weapons, Bolivia calls upon heightened security for nations with stockpiles of WMD. These nations must secure the weapons they have in order to obliterate the threat of terrorists obtaining such powerful weapons. A way to do this is to raise security levels; through this, concerns of illicit WMD trafficking should diminish. With this, the UN must recognize that many nations will need aid regarding government stability and resources to enact heightened security and enforce proposed laws. Bolivia looks forward to working with like-minded nations that are willing to keep WMD out of terrorists' hands.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Brazil
Delegate Name: Katie Reed
School: Vicksburg High School

Chemical, biological, and nuclear or radiological weapons all have one thing in common. They are all weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). WMD have the capacity to kill or bring harm to a large number of people resulting in chaos. Deeply conscious of our safety and well-being, Brazil believes WMD should not be overlooked and underestimated by any means. WMD are highly dangerous and threaten international peace and security.

Succeeding the Cold War, large amounts of WMD from what was once the USSR disappeared. WMD left unguarded worldwide could lead terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda to possess such damaging material. In addition to terrorist groups, Syria, Iran and North Korea are suspected to have obtained or have an interest in obtaining this type of weapon.

Deeply disturbed, Brazil and Argentina dismantled all of our nuclear weapons in 1990. Later in 1991 we formed the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Materials (ABACC). The ABACC is the first and only bi-national safeguards organization in the world. Then, in 1998 Brazil rejoined the Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) which believes in three pillars: nonproliferation, disarmament, and the right to peacefully use nuclear technology. Brazil, also a part of the New Agenda Coalition (NAC) along with New Zealand, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, South Africa, and Sweden, has been taking action to oppose the prominent threat of WMD. Recognizing the lack of progress in disarmament efforts, we all took initiative. Established in 1998, the NAC is the only group focusing primarily on the nuclear disarmament pillar. In addition, our previous permanent representative, Marcos de Azambuja, held multiple proposals on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Azambuja later submitted the proposals to the UN Secretary General.

Furthermore, Brazil strongly believes in our draft resolution “toward a nuclear weapon free world.” Realizing the threat of WMD, we recommend the Nuclear Weapons Commission be improved. We support the United Nations in building confidence measures in dealing with this difficult but manageable task. We shall then fulfill our duties to prevent non-state actors from finding access to WMD, as well as keep a close eye on suspicious countries or individuals posing a possible threat. The UN must aim to completely ban nuclear weapons in a satisfactory timeframe. This would eliminate the problem, so we encourage other countries follow. With cooperation, we can come closer to reaching our goal in preventing terrorists from acquiring weapons of mass destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Canada
Delegate Name: Cameron Bays
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

Weapons of mass destruction, or WMDs, are still a major issue in today’s society. Problems still arise with the topic of WMDs, such as security. Poor safety precautions can lead to catastrophic disasters, which much be avoided by implementing strong guarding systems. Though not as prominent as they have been in the recent past, there is still a threat regarding these weapons, and security should be a priority when dealing with them. Stores of WMDs that still exist should be secured and then safely disposed of or destroyed. Canada will be eager to assist countries that need assistance in this if needed, for example, if a nation does not have the resources to carry out proper destruction of these weapons. Production of WMDs in Canada has ceased since 1984, and we believe that other countries should follow suit, as these devices are too dangerous to be utilized.

In addition to security of these weapons, border controls and trade restrictions are also a large concern. In order to prevent rebel groups from seizing government property, tighter regulations must be put in place in order to secure borders and trade. If trade and borders are compromised, a huge threat is posed to a country, and, thus, to its livelihood. This matter should be taken care of in the international community, as international borders and trade impact not just one country, but many, as trade occurs over various nations.

Canada’s cease of WMD production also means that many of the materials needed to create these weapons should also be regulated. If it is found that groups have obtained WMDs or WMD materials, intervening actions should be taken in order to prevent these devices from being constructed. If extremist groups acquire weapons of mass destruction, they will become more powerful than ever before, posing a greater threat than previously. In the best interests of the international community, groups that have obtained WMDs and/or WMD components should be relieved of those objects.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: China
Delegate Name: Mikayla Ortell
School: Fishers High School

Since the founding of the UN, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) have create an incredibly pressing discussion over how to better secure WMD and also how to prevent this powerful weaponry from falling into the hands of terrorist or other corrupt organizations that threaten the lives of innocent people. Recent events, like the threats given by the DPRK and the chemical weapon usage of the Syrian government, and past events, such as the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII, give us reason to find more efficient ways to control these weapons. China has been one of the countries with stocks of WMD; however we have put in place harsher regulations around the security of such weapons. By placing greater security on the current WMD stockpiles, we can more likely prevent outside forces from taking this dangerous source of weapons and using it to wipe out many people. If the UN, as an international community, takes no further action against WMD that are not just nuclear weapons (such as chemical, biological, or radiological weaponry), then we aren't going to be able to efficiently prevent terrorist forces from attacking our governments and our people.

China believes that the UN needs to acknowledge the importance of halting any and all international development of WMD to protect the national security of the international community. This would prevent the development of WMD by terrorist groups or by countries that support terrorist organizations. They also need to develop more secure ways of protecting the WMD that are present now. Because of domestic regional disputes within China, stress is put on the Chinese government to instill much better protection for all the current WMD so that anti-government revolutionaries cannot gain access to this weaponry and use it against not only the Chinese government but also the citizens of China and surrounding countries. Internationally, these WMD stockpiles need to be protected, as in Russia, they are suffering from weakness of their security of these WMD, which is a serious concern to the international community due to the possibility of theft and black marketing, which could end with WMD in the hands of strong terrorist groups.

The People's Republic of China believes that the best routes to preventing terrorists from gaining WMD are to stop the large-scale development of the WMD, and also to increase security measure surrounding the existing stockpiles to prevent theft, sale, and possible usage against governments and citizens. The UN should step in and place regulations that halt the production of such weaponry. International rules regarding the security of existing stockpiles should be put in place that increase border security and also weapon containment. China believes that the issue of WMD is of such importance that an international nuclear disarmament should be considered on a world-wide scale and that if the international community agrees to a full disarmament by all parties, then China will readily agree. This solution is significantly less attainable due to it being unlikely that the nations can reach the agreement of a world-wide nuclear disarmament. China supports these ideas that would very well likely prevent terrorists from attaining WMD and directing military force towards citizens or governments through threats of using the WMD or through actually demonstrating their weapons. The best possible solutions for this issue are to increase stockpile security and to stop further technological and productive development of these Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Cuba
Delegate Name: Lexie Hermosura
School: Mattawan High School

The delegation of Cuba acknowledges the need to resolve the imminent issues raised by the existence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and is aware of the UN’s mission towards global stability and security. Misuse of highly-destructive weapons by terrorists groups lingers as a possibility with poorly-secured areas containing the WMDs. For example, nations like Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan possess stockpiles of warheads that remain insecure, leaving them in danger of theft. Insufficient border control is also evident, as a portion of Syria’s WMDs are from Libya.

Many nations possess WMDs, the Republic of Cuba not being one of them, which is hazardous as terrorists could easily obtain these weapons. With a history of our nation being victimized by terrorists, we believe that this problem is extremely important and needs to be dealt with. Between 1959 and 1960, the United States’ CIA supervised bombings and incendiary raids upon our state, which we promptly responded to by consulting the United Nations for assistance. Cuba is still wrongly targeted with terrorist threats, which pushes us to our utmost compliance with proliferating and better securing stockpiles of WMDs.

Cuba would like to collaborate with Bolivia, China, Venezuela, and all other delegates who concur with our beliefs to formulate a suitable resolution to this perilous situation. We think that the UN should support having an official to oversee the stockpiles of WMDs. This would help with security issues; essentially, the official would be involved with overseeing the processes of tightening security on existing stockpiles and border control. Additionally, all nations possessing WMDs should meet set deadlines in relation to the installing these officials to ensure the security of these areas. In this scenario, halting all WMD production will have its own deadline, commissioning sufficient security will have its own deadline, and etc. Determining deadlines and goals will be a topic to discuss amongst delegates in committee.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Denmark
Delegate Name: Sean Johnson
School: Williamston High School

Unsecured WMD stockpiles, mostly nuclear, are still a major threat in the former USSR. While the CTR did attempt to move the remaining warheads from Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine, all of these countries still continue to illegally possess these highly dangerous, and poorly kept weapons. These countries also have poor security on these and take the risk of having them stolen. Meanwhile in Syria, the use of chemical armaments has raised another point in the black market trade for WMD.

Denmark's history with the USSR is very shaky; which is all the more reason to be against their use of WMD. The possession and use of these dangerous weapons and shouldn't be left in the hands of the USSR. Denmark fully understands the danger of the situation and is willing to work with it's allies to resolve it.

To have this problem solved there are many steps that should be taken. Firstly, improving security over these stockpiles; having more, better trained people on the job, ensuring the weapons are safe. As well as more effectively dismantling the weapons in the stockpiles; taking more caution to the possibility of radiation sickness, as well as safely transporting the parts. Improved border security is a major part as well; better inspections of the weapons that enter and leave the areas. We expect to be supported by the UN, as well as my neighboring countries such as Sweden and Norway. I'm sure that the U.S would be willing to aid in these security measures as well.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Ecuador
Delegate Name: Karl Hillenbrand
School: Fishers High School

Ecuador would like to state that it supports the ideas and movement of the United Nation to eliminate weapons of mass destruction and the push to stop the spread of these weapons. Ecuador would also like to state that the problem at hand is one of the international committee and that no one area can be eliminated in this issue. Ecuador believes that this issue involves mainly the areas that contain nuclear weapons but can be supported by countries that do not have nuclear weapons. These areas that contain nuclear weapons should be transparent in their stockpiles and where they are contained so that the international committee can look further into protecting these areas from terrorist activities. Countries with uncertain political or militaristic problems should be focused on and questioned on the safeguards that are being put into place to protect these weapons in the community.

Ecuador has eliminated all nuclear weapon stockpiles and capabilities in the country of Ecuador itself and are now using nuclear technology for power plants in the country. Ecuador is a strong member of the treaty of Tlatelolco and are active members in its formation and in keeping the treaty up to date. Ecuador is a constitutionally mandated zone of peace, condemning the development and use of weapons of mass destruction and is not a supporter of countries not part of a committee to eliminate nuclear weapons. Ecuador approves of many ideas brought forth by the United Nations and agrees with its clear goals and objectives. Ecuador takes part in votes for disarmament and supports most ideas from the United Nations. Ecuador also approves of movements to safeguard areas that are unable to proficiently protect their nuclear weapon stockpiles and until any agreement towards complete elimination of nuclear weapons that measures should be taken to protect these sites from funds outside the domestic scene. Ecuador is part of the nuclear weapon-free zone in Latin America and the Caribbean, and regretted that the conference that met in 2012 to create a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, have not been made. Ecuador believes that the policies of the treaty of Tlatelolco can be applied to the Middle Eastern area.

Ecuador believes that all nuclear stockpiles in any country should have a complete layout of the safeguards in place to guard these facilities and if they are not guarded sufficiently that they are either protected by outside officials or the measures in place are improved by the country that has control over the weapons. Ecuador also is against any movement of nuclear weapons and that any trade of nuclear devices are for peaceful measures. Ecuador also believes that any state that is unable to protect its borders from outside states and has nuclear weapons should be sent away or disarmed in that country. Ecuador also agrees with the United Nations on recent policies of disarmament but does not agree with the power to negotiate to be moved outside the committee. Ecuador agrees with all the policies of how to disarm Nuclear devices and where these devices are disarmed agreeing with the international community on this topic.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Egypt
Delegate Name: Esperanza Cirilo
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

Egypt has been a leader in establishing transparency and multilateral cooperation to create a Weapons of Mass Destruction Free Zone(WMDFZ) in the Middle East for decades and will continue to pursue our past efforts for a safer future. Recent political upheaval in Egypt has not changed Egypt’s opinion that the best way to prevent terrorists from acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) is to eradicate the unnecessary and dangerous stockpiles altogether. It is the responsibility of the international community to ensure that WMD’s are not only kept out of the hands of terrorists, but eradicated for good. Individual states need to recognize the necessity of such a proposal. Egypt acknowledges that there are many challenges facing the practicality of a WMDFZ such as regional mistrust, governmental instability, and the assumption that WMD’s are a useful political tool. However, Egypt also feels that the establishment of a WMDFZ would be a perfect international stage for the countries of the Middle East to begin peaceful negotiations and cooperation.

Egypt would like to reassert the positive reputation and example we have set in international cooperation regarding WMD’s. We are signatories of the Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT), the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the African Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone (the Pelindaba Treaty), and the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, as well as a the IAEA Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. Egypt has pursued nuclear energy programs in the past few decades and has well developed nuclear facilities to pursue this endeavor that meet all IAEA standards and regulations. The political changes encompassing our nation have halted Egypt’s progression toward nuclear energy research, but Egypt still stands as an example to the world of a country responsibly using nuclear capabilities to the betterment of our nation.

Egypt also finds it necessary to address our recent walk out of the NPT Conference in Geneva last April. Egypt has waited too long for too little progress on the WMDFZ agreed upon in 1995. Specifically, Egypt finds Israel’s decisive inability to be a positive and legitimate member of the nuclear arms community disheartening and unacceptable. Egypt hopes that soon, Israel will decide to pursue progress over misplaced nuclear superiority. Most importantly, WMD security is a question of international security and arguing national sovereignty to prevent international intervention will only halt the world’s progress.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Germany
Delegate Name: Ross Allen
School: Williamston High School

One of the most prominent threats to the world is the possibility that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) may fall into the hands of terrorist groups. Worldwide, there are stashes of unsecured WMD that, left unguarded, could be acquired by terrorist organizations. These WMD have the potential to kill hundreds of thousands of citizens worldwide. To prevent this threat from becoming a reality, nations of the world must come together to find a resolution.

Germany has been a world leader in the fight against terrorism. Our nation has taken many steps to combat the spread of terrorism and has many views on how best to deal with this issue. We hope to bring terrorists to justice, halt the proliferation of WMD, and assist countries without the capabilities to secure their own WMD. We believe that the threat of terrorists acquiring WMD poses a danger to both our nation’s economy and security.

To deal with threat, many actions must be taken. To begin with, nations must improve their accounting and physical protection systems for their WMD. This includes providing better security at the facilities in which the WMD are stored. States should attempt to crack down on the illicit trafficking of WMD. Nations should also make sure not to supply WMD to non-State actors. Finally, the international community should strive to provide assistance to nations lacking the infrastructure to secure their WMD. The nation of Germany calls upon the countries of the world to take these steps and more in order to prevent terrorist groups from obtaining weapons of mass destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Guatemala
Delegate Name: Autumn Schmidt
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Although Guatemala isn’t necessarily a high risk country for the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction, we are very aware that it is a critical issue for world safety because if a terrorist acquires a weapon in any country it could be extremely destructive to the safety and well-being of all countries. To prove our commitment to preventing terrorists from acquiring these weapons we joined in the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). The executive secretary of the preparatory commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) said: “Guatemala’s ratification underlines their commitment to outlaw nuclear testing and to enhance non-proliferation and disarmament worldwide.” There are other organizations involved such as the CEC, BWC and Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

The existing WMD stockpiles or components of WMDs should be better secured by agreements on methods by all governments or could be stored in agreed upon locations where unauthorized access could not be possible. The existing border controls and trade restrictions are not sufficient protection as proved by the continued illegal transport and rising black market. The additional measures should be to improve the security of existing stockpiles, dismantling the stockpiles more efficiently, improving border security and coordination of tracking suspect shipments through increased communication among all governments.

The circumstances in which it is appropriate for the international community to intervene to prevent extremist groups from accessing WMDs or WMD components is when there is sufficient suspicion or established proof that they will likely acquire the weapons. The international community should work together to intervene immediately because any delay could result in catastrophic harm, however, this is proving extremely difficult because this involves issues of individual sovereignty and parts of some treaties may be good for one country but not for others. This is why it is taking so long to find an international solution.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Hungary
Delegate Name: Max Labe
School: Roeper School

Hungary’s position on measures to prevent terrorists from acquiring weapons of mass destruction is fundamentally guided by Hungary’s is a member of NATO. Hungry hosted the annual NATO conference disarmament of weapons of mass destruction last year. This year in New York on October first hungry said that, “Our heart goes out to the families of the victims of that cowardly executed terrorist act.” Hungry is very much against terrorism, supporting the United States troops in Afghanistan. Our nation has opposed the transfer of dangerous WMD weapons in hands of terrorists. This is of great concern to the people of Hungary. Hungary’s participation in NATO makes us a key member in the international community committed to working with its partners in the EU to keep these weapons out of the hands of terrorist organizations.

Hungry is working with NATO, and the EU, to get rid of these weapons of mass destruction. The situation in Syria, with the use of chemical weapons is alarming to many Hungarians. Hungry has stated that it believes that to secure the region and the globe, we need to get these weapons of mass destruction away from terrorist organizations. The EU and NATO to disarm this these weapons commit hungry to efforts.

Hungary is closely watching as the UN begins to take more control in Afghanistan. We are also supporting the war efforts in Afghanistan by the United States. Hungary wants other nations outside the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to accede and join it without conditions. Hungary is very committed to disarment and security of the globe when it comes to weapons of mass destruction. Hungary with other nations to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: India
Delegate Name: Caroline Kuiper
School: Forest Hills Central High School

One of the largest looming threats in the world today is the possibility of world warfare between terrorist groups who have acquired weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Many of these WMD and the radioactive components which power them are kept under alarmingly light security systems for weapons with such potential. As a unified entity and under the individual states themselves, precautions must be taken to assure the safekeeping of WMD from these terrorists. As a nuclear weapons state, India is ready to discuss the monitoring and joint improvement of all components of WMD security.

Since entering nuclear weapon statehood in 1998, India has been opposed to the idea of nuclear warfare. As a victim of terrorism for over three decades, we are fully cognizant of the catastrophic dangers that transfers of WMD to non-state and terrorists could entail. Along with our allies, we stand against the use of WMD by terrorists. We believe that the further use of WMD by terrorists is detrimental to not only the economic stability and overall security of our nation, but the world as a whole.

As a nation, we propose the strengthening of the security and trafficking of WMD and their components. To address this threat, we must increase the patrolling of our borders and provide other necessary precautions to ensure the safekeeping of these formidable pieces of weaponry. We call upon and urge others to join us in our efforts to preserve the morals of our respective countries and prevent WMD from falling into the hands of those terrorists who taint the images of all of our respective nations.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Iran
Delegate Name: Sasawat Prankprakma
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Contrary to statements made by the Zionist Entity and its accomplices, Iran does not maintain any WMD programs and strongly encourages all other nations to do the same.

An often cited concern about WMDs getting into the wrong hands is our nuclear program. We believe that all entities with nuclear programs must be subject to thorough inspections by the IAEA. So far the imperialist powers that manipulate the actions of the global community have been focusing their attention to Iran. We refuse to be held to their insane, biased, imperialist double standard. The real threat to world peace, and the cause of the biggest risk that we may see nuclear warfare erupt in the Middle–East is the Zionist Entity. Our nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes; however, we would like to keep control of our entire nuclear fuel cycle. If we are to be subject to intrusive inspections, then the Zionist Entity, along with all countries in the world that have nuclear programs must also be subject to intrusive inspections. We would be willing to make compromises as long as we are allowed to continue to have full control over our fuel cycle, instead of being dependent on other countries for fissile material.

We are greatly concerned by the use of chemical weapons in Syria as we have felt the effects of chemical weaponry first hand when Iraq used mustard gas against us. Making sure that the Syrian chemical weapons stash is destroyed and does not fall into the hands of the rebels is a priority.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Iraq
Delegate Name: Sally Wolf
School: Fishers High School

The Republic of Iraq is already party to eight international conventions and protocols on non-proliferation and disarmament, the Geneva Protocol of 1925, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Safeguards agreement, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Additional Protocol, and the Hague Code of conduct. Iraq is also party to nine international conventions and protocols on counter-terrorism, including the Convention on Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed On Board Aircraft, the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the safety of Civil Aviation, the Convention on the prevention and Punishment of Crime against Internationally protected persons, including Diplomatic Agents, the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of violence at airports serving International Civil Aviation, the International Convention for the Suppression of the financing of terrorism, the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist, the International Convention for the Suppression acts of nuclear terrorism, and the Convention on physical protection of nuclear material.

In 2004, Iraq consented to the Security Council Resolution 1540, and to the required national reporting. In 2012, Iraq issued the National Monitoring Authority for Non-proliferation Act No. 48. The Iraqi National Monitoring Authority (INMA) has controlled the import and export of items that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction, to prevent illegal use. The INMA has also worked to educate individuals both inside and outside of Iraq on the dangers of weapons of mass destruction.

Iraq has supported contact with both the United Nations and the European Union within Iraq to prevent the risk of terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction.

To reduce the threat of terrorism, Iraq supports the criminalization of all support for terrorist networks. Iraq also encourages cooperation with regional bodies, international bodies, and international conventions and protocols.

To eliminate weapons of mass destruction, Iraq supports international agreements to regulate trade of weapons-usable technology and centers established by the European Union to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The Republic of Iraq seeks to prevent non-state entities from obtaining weapons of mass destruction through the UN Security Council Resolution 1540, and to develop international, regional, and sub-regional strategies regarding the prevention of weapons of mass destruction being used for terrorist purposes. Most importantly, Iraq encourages individual states to strengthen national measures against weapons of mass destruction. Iraq offers the INMA as a model for a national organization to counteract terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and supports national sovereignty when member states have established effective national organizations dealing with terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.

The Republic of Iraq encourages the United Nations to facilitate regional organizations, as this is the most effective way of dealing with each region’s specific difficulties with counter-terrorism and avoids infringements on national sovereignty.

Works Referenced

"Iraq Designates National Authority For The Chemical Weapons Convention."Www.OPWC.org. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, 16 Feb. 2009. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.

"Measures Taken by Iraq to Prevent Terrorists from Obtaining Weapons of Mass Destruction and Their Means of Delivery and Related Materials." REPORT OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL ON MEASURES TO PREVENT TERRORISTS FROM ACQUIRING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. UNODA, 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2013

Tucker, Jonathon B. "James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies." Iraq Faces Major Challenges in Destroying Its Legacy Chemical Weapons. Monterey Institute of International Studies, 4 Mar. 2010. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Israel
Delegate Name: Eli Simons
School: Roeper School

As a country that has placed great importance on security since its birth. and has been plagued by hostility from the international community, internal conflicts, and terrorist-attacks for just as long, Israel understands the importance of keeping dangerous materials out of terrorist’s hands. Israel has learned how to do its best to prevent terrorism while upholding the rights of its citizens and wants to continue to work towards peace and tranquility throughout the Middle East.

The possibility of terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction is one that must never become a reality. Unfortunately, the international community has been going about this the wrong way. Israel has gotten a lot of undeserved criticism over the years for not signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.I srael asks that the international community look further into our reasoning. First of all, with the nation of Iran growing closer and closer to nuclear capacity, * constantly threatening Israel and the Jewish people, Israel cannot help but arm itself. Secondly, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty does not work. Many of the countries who signed it pay no attention to it. The United States and Russia in particular are known to have vast arsenals of Nuclear Weapons ready for use at the press of a button.

A more sensible and effective approach to keeping weapons of mass destructions out of the hands of terrorists would be to control the dangerous materials used to make these weapons instead of outlawing them. Tight control over materials such as Uranium and other elements used in Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological weapons.

Israel hopes to work with nations who share its views in the hopes of creating a safer, more secure, and more sensible world.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Jamaica
Delegate Name: MacAlister Clover
School: Williamston High School

Weapons of mass destruction have always been a pressing issue throughout the world. We as fellow human beings, have an obligation to ban together and keep safe that which is most important in instances like this; order and peace. We as United Nations must find a way to suppress the life threatening scenarios that can be potentially caused by unaccounted control of WMD.

There are several steps to keeping all WMD accounted for. One; world powers must hold greater account for their weapons. Two; Non-world powers must seek aid from allied world powers to keep control and watch over any WMD that they have. As a country with close relations to the United States, Jamaica will assist them in precautions to protect WMD in addition to aiding defense against any instance of militant threat from terrorist groups that have control of unaccounted WMD. If threatened, Jamaica expects our allies to do the same. The Jamaican Defense Force, although preoccupied with police aid currently, will willingly do their part in assisting world powers in snuffing out any WMD threat.

Because Jamaica is not (alone) a powerful military force against such things as Weapons of Mass Destruction; We seek to reach out to our American Ally as well as other world powers such as Germany, to assist in keeping control of WMD to defend against the potential risk of said weapons getting in the wrong hands. The priority in dealing with illicit trafficking of said weapons is security, and it must be maintained.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Japan
Delegate Name: Charlie Drew
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

On March 20, 1995, the cult/terrorist organization Aum Shinrikyo released sarin gas in five Tokyo subway lines in five coordinated attacks. It was the most significant attack to occur in Japan since the dropping of the atomic bombs at the end of World War II. The attack resulted in twelve deaths and more than 5,000 other injuries, seventeen of which were deemed critical and thirty-seven others severe. Those responsible were promptly arrested, and the leader, Shoko Asahara, was sentenced to death and is currently awaiting his execution. In 2000, the group, which changed its name to Aleph, was placed under close surveillance by the authorities for four years. The group is still considered by authorities to be a threat to society.

Despite the severity of the attacks, it could have been much, much worse. An article published in the New York Times following the attacks revealed that Aum's chemical stockpile could have created enough nerve gas to kill 4.2 to 10 million people. The group owned a large production plant called Satyan 7 which was designed to produce seventy tons of the nerve agent. Several sources speculated the plant may have come from Russia, and a senior Aum member testified in court in 1997 that Aum obtained the design for the sarin plant from a Russian source, and that the group donated 10 million yen to secretary of the Russian Security Council, Oleg Lobov.

All this considered, Japan believes that not only should terrorist acquisition of weapons of mass destruction from internal stocks or other countries be considered, but also terrorist production of chemical weapons, as it potentially be an equally significant threat due to the convenience of supply. For example, monitoring the sale of potentially dangerous chemicals would help prevent anyone who would use them for harm from acquiring enough to do harm.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Jordan
Delegate Name: Delaney Webb
School: Mattawan High School

The delegation of Jordan recognizes that weapons of mass destruction (WMD) pose many dangers. With poor WMD security, it is clear that terrorist groups can easily obtain these weapons. Poor border security, for example, allows for easier procuring of the highly dangerous weapons. Previous problems have been acted on through programs like the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction, although not completely diminishing the problem. The threat of international terrorism through WMDs could result in major crises around the world; therefore, it is necessary for the U.N. to collaborate and find the best fitting solution.

Jordan has recently experienced difficulties with WMDs in regards to the Syrian civil war with the use of chemical weapons. Jordan responded to this issue by closely collaborating with the United State of America, and also with Canada. In April of 2004, Jordan had to take measures to stop a planned chemical weapon attack from Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists. Clearly, Jordan is at the heart of this issue and will passionately discuss viable options to deplete like happenings.

The delegation of Jordan looks to collaborate with the USA and Canada once again. The first action that Jordan sees fit is to have all those with WMDs in possession take the proper care in securing them. This should be overseen by an official to assure the proper care. Next, border security must be improved, both by more checkpoints and better quality inspections. This also should be overseen by an official, and both of these steps should be accomplished by an agreed-upon date set by the committee.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Lebanon
Delegate Name: Alfredo Prado
School: Instituto Educativo Olinca

The weapons of mass destruction are non-conventional weapons, which are often manufactured to be used with other non-conventional, or even conventional weapons. This was particular seen during the Cold War, which divided the world. With globalization and new technologies, the information on the construction and manufacturing of these weapons is easy to find and access. This type of information can be found in some Internet sites, some of these sites are used by terrorists. Furthermore, terrorists groups have the possibility of obtaining the materials needed for the manufacturing of such weapons.

Lebanon has introduced laws and regulations that permit the inspection of any type of weapon that is transported, in transit or exported across its borders and it prohibits the trafficking of such weapons. It also prosecutes terrorists. The Lebanese law does not permit the harboring of terrorists. Lebanon does not possess weapons of mass destruction and it is bound by the resolutions of the United Nations which prohibit the use or acquisition of such weapons by terrorists. Lebanon encourages other countries to strength international cooperation. Lebanon also participates in international efforts to combat terrorism and has introduced the necessary legislation and strict deterrent regulations to regulate the prosecution and surveillance of terrorists if they are present in Lebanon's territory. Lebanon is very alarmed by Israel's failure to comply with international legitimacy and sees this as a threat to all the nations in this region.

Lebanon condemns all forms of terrorism and supports the union of international efforts to combat against it. Nevertheless, Lebanon does not develop such weapons and supports restrictions on their ownership in order to establish a Mass Destruction Weapons free zone in the Middle East. Lebanon is also against the threat of using massive destruction weapons. Lebanon also rejected the very use of these weapons; there is no such thing as a legitimate use of mass destruction weapons. Lebanon also contemplates the possibility of the installation of new border crossing checkpoints and new equipment in order to detect chemical, biological and nuclear materials. In the existence of an international threat, the international community should take action, in order to protect humanity.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Libya
Delegate Name: Lauren Anderson
School: Roeper School

The northern African country of Libya has been plagued continuously with violence, even with the decision of former president, Muammar Gadaffi, to disband our substantial weapons program – along with Libya’s relinquishment and destruction of existing weapons (results of the ratification of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003). While this was a considerable step forward in the field of international relations, there is still an ongoing threat: all nuclear and ballistic weapons have yet to be destroyed, as well as weapons factories not yet having been converted into peaceful use facilities. This allows for potential theft by terrorist groups, and an increased threat of attacks like that on the American diplomatic buildings in Benghazi. Terror groups want to acquire even more deadly weapons, those of mass destruction, including conventional high explosives, biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons, in order to perpetrate greater acts of violence against states or groups they see as their enemies.

With increased international support – as originally defined in the NPT – Libya could help in the global effort to reduce this risk. While nuclear weapons are dangerous, they would be particularly lethal under the control of individuals or groups seeking to use them for terror. Under state control, with the best interest of the country in mind, they could serve as a form of protection. Libya slowed its turn-over of existing weapons when it appeared that we would not be receiving the listed aid from the United States; this would just leave us vulnerable, to both foreign and internal attacks alike.

Libya is prepared to work with other nations to reach an agreement that would strengthen controls against terrorists from acquiring WMD’s. The world can do no less if we wish to achieve peace and security in our lifetime.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Luxembourg
Delegate Name: Olivia Venus
School: Kalamazoo Central High School

Luxembourg was a part of the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Threat of 2007, which promoted peace, and respect of legitimate interests, as well as neighborly relations throughout Europe and the Middle East. Closer cooperation within the countries trying to prevent terrorists and threat countries from acquiring weapons of mass destruction would enhance physical protection, making it easier for regulations on weapons to be ratified. Enhancing the U.N. security in lands such as Syria, Iran, and North Korea would also be an important act in preventing terrorists from acquiring and using such weapons. A stronger control over technologies and materials used in making weapons of mass destruction by the U.N. would also be a necessary measure in the prevention of terrorism by nuclear weapons as well as weapons of mass destruction. The Luxembourg Forum president stated at the conference in Montreux, Switzerland on 21st May, 2013 that "The theme of tolerance is widely used in public practice, despite the fact that it does not meet the challenges of the 21st century. That is why we need to enhance the idea of tolerance with the concept of security. the limit of tolerance defining the conditions in which tolerance becomes dangerous for society, is an innovative feature of the concept of secure tolerance. Crossing the limit requires strict and legitimate measures to restore secure and civilized compromise. The initial application of this approach may prevent nuclear technologies from progressing to the military level." Therefore, more U.N. security, cooperation, and tolerance will help prevent terrorists from acquiring weapons of mass destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Micronesia
Delegate Name: Joe Mangum
School: Royal Oak High School

As the delegate of the Federate States of Micronesia, I’d like to first acknowledge that fact that the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) has increased greatly from their first use. For most countries their worst nightmare is being attacked by one the WMD and the attack have devastating effects on the economy, both within in their country and on also on a global scale, and their citizens health. But a problem that needs to be addressed is also the opposite. There are stockpiles of WMD in countries that aren’t being touched, and that can also be very scary. The scariest part of it is that lack of control some of these governments have over these stockpiles. The WMD could easily be taken by rebel groups and used with devastating effects. As a country with four states how are manly protected by the Unites States, we don’t feel as in danger as some other countries. This is still a pressing issue that needs to be dealt with. We do not think that the creation of agencies is the answer but using preexisting ones like the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) whose purpose outlined in the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is to “Nuclear security issues relating to the prevention and detection of, and response to, theft, sabotage, unauthorized access and illegal transfer or other malicious acts involving nuclear material and other radioactive substances and their associated facilities are addressed in the IAEA Nuclear Security Series publications”. This utilization of the preexisting agency will save funds and also take less time to put into place the actions we agree upon in committee. We would like to see better control of the stock piles and more efficient border patrol to reduce the chances of these WMD leaving countries or even before, that getting stolen. This is defiantly a matter of national security and should be handled with the upmost urgency and care to create the best possible solution for this problem.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Morocco
Delegate Name: Jessica Glynn
School: Williamston High School

Weapons of mass destruction have been a key importance of international security since the beginning of the UN. “The proliferation of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, and their means of delivery, threatens incalculable consequences for global stability and prosperity,” stated by the Strategic Concept of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. With the rise of international terrorism, global and regional tensions, technology improvement, and the breakdown of security, the black market for WMDs is at an international high.

The first WMDs were seen in World War I. They were next seen when Japan conducted research on biological weapons in World War II. Following the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, many countries labored on the work of WMDs for their own protection in the Cold War. Today, states have officially committed to eliminating all stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. Their goal is to eliminate all nuclear weapons. Currently, nine countries possess nuclear weapons – Britain, China, France, India, Israel (assumed), North Korea (claimed), Pakistan, Russia, and the United States. Several states are believed to hold chemical and/or biological warfare agents.

Morocco has many concerns about terrorism including terrorism within its own country. Morocco believes that WMDs should only be used in an emergency, not against other countries. WMDs should be kept in a secret and safe place with many guards. This will help prevent anyone from getting to them. They should never be used unless given permission by the UN, and should never be used in any war against other countries.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Nepal
Delegate Name: Annie Lilac
School: Mattawan High School

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) have always posed a threat to international safety, even when in the capable hands of diplomatic countries. Should these WMD fall into the wrong hands, the results could be catastrophic to international safety. Currently, large amounts of unsecured and poorly secured warheads and nuclear materials, such as weapons-grade plutonium and uranium, exist in the former USSR, as well as Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. The weak security surrounding these WMD leaves them open to theft from terrorist organizations. In Syria, it has been discovered that a large portion of the WMD there are actually from Libya. This displays the obvious need for better border control when concerning WMD and WMD components.

Nepal has been a victim of terrorism from the Maoist group, and understands the devastating effects it can have on a country. For many years, the Maoist terrorists have been taking innocent lives, abducting children to work as child soldiers, and destroying schools and private homes. To leave WMD poorly secured and thus available to similar terrorist organizations would create a major threat, not only to Nepal, but to all of humanity. Nepal is free from all types of WMD and does not produce, manufacture, possess, import, or export any weapons of nuclear, biological, or chemical nature. We have always strongly felt that the existence of WMD is a threat to international peace and security, even more so when available to unpredictable organizations that would use the weapons without warning on civilian populations. Reform is needed to improve international security and keep WMD out of terrorist hands.

Nepal has always believed in working towards complete and general disarmament when concerning nuclear, biological, and chemical WMD, but realizes that this would be a difficult and gradual process. We strongly support immediate action to increase the security of existing WMD stockpiles and WMD component stockpiles under supervision of the United Nations. Border control also needs to be greatly improved, especially around and near countries where known terrorist groups have significant power. We would suggest implementing better technology, more checkpoints, or more effective inspection policies. Existing stockpiles should also be dismantled efficiently and safely disposed of. We would like to see the phased elimination of WMD with a reasonable timeline that can be agreed upon by the United Nations. Nepal is eager to collaborate and compromise with Brazil, China, Venezuela, and all other delegates who share similar views on this pressing topic.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: New Zealand
Delegate Name: Tyler DeMars
School: Mattawan High School

As I am sure everyone is aware, the WMD stockpiles in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, etc, could become a very large and threatening dilemma if not addressed properly. Our job as delegates from our respective nations is to come up with a solution that would limit the threat that these unused, minimally secured, WMD’s pose to the security and well being of all our nations, New Zealand included.

New Zealand strongly believes that the security of these weapons affects the whole world, not just any countries in particular. If captured by the wrong hands, terrorists for example, these weapons could quickly turn into extremely dangerous threats that would pose a problem to every nation. These weapons could easily have devastating and catastrophic effects on our nations, causing enormous tragedy and loss of life. I am very sure that everyone agrees that this threat desperately needs to be dealt with, before it blows out of proportion.

We delegates need to take action and secure these WMD’s before great harm is caused to the people we represent and our nations we care so much for. Many initiatives can be taken into consideration here, such as funding for the protection of these weapons, improving border controls, or the removal of these weapons from their current locations. We don't believe that these measures should be left up to the respective states that have possession of these weapons, for their security affects the whole international community. It is our responsibility, as delegates from the United Nations, to take action that prevents these weapons from becoming a massive problem. Therefore, new Zealand looks forward to working cooperatively to find a reasonable, and effective solution.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Nigeria
Delegate Name: Chris Evans
School: Mattawan High School

The delegation of Nigeria would like to recognize the danger that weapons of mass destruction pose to the well being of all nations. Furthermore, Nigeria is aware that this threat increases exponentially when WMDs fall into the hands of terrorist organizations. If this were to happen, it would undoubtedly be detrimental to all nations. While these weapons are carefully monitored, and not produced as prolifically as they once were, the resources used to manufacture weapons of mass destruction remain poorly guarded in some nations. If terrorist organizations gain access to these materials, millions of lives could be compromised. The United Nations must find a way to secure these weapons in order ensure global tranquility.

In recent years, Nigeria has developed a strong position on the attainability of nuclear capabilities. As one of the countries to ratify the Treaty of Pelindaba, Nigeria is fully against the use of nuclear weapons by any nation. This treaty prohibits the research, development, manufacture, stockpiling, acquisition, testing, possession, control or stationing of nuclear explosive devices in the territory of all ratifying parties. Nigeria feels strongly that there are great perils that stem from all weapons of mass destruction, not only nuclear devices. It is clear that as long as there are unsecured weapons of mass destruction, the significant danger that they pose will remain a constant threat to all nations. This is Nigeria’s motivation behind its determination to contribute to a multilateral plan with the purpose of preventing WMDs from falling into the wrong hands.

Nigeria is adamant that the solution to this issue must be of a multifaceted nature. This is because in order to contain and eliminate this looming threat, many components must be addressed. For one, Nigeria suggests that nations who possess WMDs must improve their accounting and physical protection systems in order to effectively secure these weapons. These nations must be held accountable for securing their own property, and to ensure this, a international board that will monitor security should be established. Also, the issue of illicit trafficking must be addressed. Nigeria proposes that all nations strengthen their borders to a certain standard of security, with WMD’s in mind. Halting the transportation of these devices is an important component to solving this problem as a whole. Nigeria is looking forward to collaborating with fellow forward-moving nations in the effort to eliminate the complex threat of weapons of mass destruction being acquired by terrorist organizations.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: North Korea

The North Korean government is highly invested in measures to prevent “terrorist” from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. Yet, our government is more concern with nonproliferation. But we have made modest efforts toward disarmament, such as the prospect of a nonaggression pact with Syria on denuclearization. This would assist the United States and their ally Israel in their pursuit of ending the country’s war tirade. Yet, Uncle Sam and his whinny little Dog the EU bark and growl as we firmly refuse to toss “Frisbees” of nonaggression on the condition of denuclearization. We should be considered a minimum threat in the nuclear arms race. Our nuclear efforts were once centered on plutonium, but it’s difficult to sustain the program due to its lack of retail. It’s as if we are being branded as the “terrorist,” but we are nothing more than innocent children being bullied and taunted by the more experienced and so called “righteous” nations.

Unremorsefully, Caitlin Hayden, National Security spokeswoman, made a comment stating that, "We will judge North Korea…and look forward to seeing steps that show North Korea is ready to abide by its commitments and obligations." We haven’t made any commitments and aren’t obligated to do anything. In order for our society to flourish, we need room to expand and experiment. We will be unable to do this if constantly pressured by other nations for crimes only merited by suspicion. As of April 2012, our military has been granted six, ICBMs, intercontinental ballistic missiles, all of which are inactive. We indeed have missiles that can reach Japan and maybe even Guan, but we haven’t yet begun to test them. So this nonsense of attacking the United States is completely baffling.

In light of this, our government has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction especially those acquired by “terrorist.” Transactions between Syria have been made, yet it was needed to fund our nuclear programs. So to all nations who fear our progress, don’t at all. There is nothing to fear. Although our adversaries may contend, we’re innocent and look to reestablish our country on solid ground.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Pakistan
Delegate Name: Madeline Bolton
School: Royal Oak High School

Terrorism is one of Pakistan’s most critical security issues. Therefore, terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction is also a pressing matter. Pakistan believes that it is within a country’s own authority to try to handle situations with terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction. Pakistan believes that if nations are unable to control terrorist from obtaining WMD, then they have the responsibility to seek help, possibly through partnerships. Pakistan sought partnership with The United States against a common terrorist threat. A unilateral attack on the Taliban Leader ensued, which was detrimental to any Pakistani- Taliban negotiations. In addition, 40,000 people have died, the vast majority innocent civilians, and massive damage has occurred to Pakistani social and physical infrastructure. For this reason, Pakistan believes if a partnership were to develop, it should be a bilateral partnership.

Pakistan believes that terrorist groups should not have access or opportunity to acquire WMD, and it is a nation’s duty to try and prevent terrorist groups from doing so. Intervenience from the international community in protecting against terrorist groups obtaining WMD is necessary at times. Pakistan supports resolution 2118, dealing with the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons, and resolution 1696 dealing with sanctions on Iran for their nuclear program because of supposed terrorism. Iran has reaped many benefits from their cooperation and anti- terrorism efforts- the lifting of sanctions, subsidies and political influence. Intervenience from the international community can have positive effects and is necessary at times. If intervenience happens, Pakistan would like to stress respect of international law when dealing with the war on terror.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Portugal
Delegate Name: Sean Flikkema
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

Portugal is a smaller country, which is not typically viewed as a very powerful country, and therefore is not regularly targeted by terrorist attacks. However, an exception would be in 1983, there was a Turkish Embassy attack in the capital city of Lisbon. On July 27, at around 10:30 a.m., two Ford Escorts, one red and one white, arrived at the home/embassy building of the Turkish Ambassador. The Ambassador’s bodyguard, who had seen the same white Ford Escort the day before, was suspicious and came out on to the driveway to challenge the two men. One of the attackers opened fire on a nearby Portuguese policeman, wounding him but not killing him. The bodyguard then shot and killed that attacker. Meanwhile, four other attackers, who could not gain access to the embassy building, went into the home of the ambassador, holding the only two people as hostages; the ambassador’s wife and son. Then the four attackers placed plastic explosives all around the home and threatened to detonate the explosives if any policemen came near. The attackers then detonated a bomb anyway and caught the house on fire, burning and killing six people inside. But the son, Atasay, managed to jump out of the window of the home while the previously mentioned police officer (the one who had been shot) gained access through a back door into the home and was then killed in the fire. In total seven were killed, including the wife of the ambassador, the police officer, and five of the attackers. The Armenian Revolutionary Army later declared responsibility for the attack.

In conclusion, Portugal, although not regularly targeted or attacked by terrorists, it still has happened and could happen again due to the fact that terrorism is growing all over the world. Portugal does not have to worry too much about problems larger countries face such as internet and technical hackers that the United States, Russia, Great Britain, Japan, and other countries face. Portugal does also not face many threats from weapons of mass destruction (WMD) which are, once again, a much larger threat to countries such as the United States, Russia, China, North Korea, etc. The only other WMD threat Portugal faces actually comes from something quite common, gardening chemicals used to remove weeds. These weed removers were tested and found to be extremely deadly if consumed and could also be deadly if accidentally put into an open cut, wound, or scrape. These chemicals could be especially deadly if used by terrorists or other attackers, but that problem has now been resolved. The chemicals have been replaced with other substances much less deadly than the previous ones.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Russia
Delegate Name: Chris Cribbs
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

Ever since the United States commenced the Manhattan Project and the Trinity bombings, weapons of mass destruction have been at the forefront of international concern. Distrust over the handling of atomic weaponry led to the international conflict known as the Cold War, where the Soviet Union and the United States competed in an arms race. While that race has ended, its effects are incredibly clear. The Russian Federation does not have a nuclear policy similar to the failed Soviet state. Since the collapse of the USSR, we have participated in several disarmament treaties with America. Nuclear stockpiles, however, are not the subject of this committee. Our duty is to keep similar weapons, including chemical and biological, from getting in the hands of rogue factions.

There are increasing fears that terrorist organizations will gain access to a WMD and use it against a nation. Such an attack would be devastating to its target. While normal attacks would be an act of war, it is harder to retaliate against a terror attack, as terrorist groups cannot be strictly held accountable for their actions(a lesson we have all learned from the failure of the US’s so-called “War on Terror”).

The most obvious method of prevention is that of security- if every nation had advanced protocols for the defense of their WMDs, then terrorism would not be a concern. Russia has been very engaged in disarmament. However, due to the expenses related to the destruction of nuclear weapons, we are not as able to secure the stockpiles that are pending destruction. After the collapse of the USSR, Russia shifted its primary focus from military domination to economic growth. This shift resulted in a dramatic loss of funding to storage facilities across our nation.

To solve this crisis of insecurity, Russia calls upon the international community to assist those in need of aid. While the UN may not be the prime forum to organize this, Russia encourages agreements between nations to assist in protecting the weapons of those who cannot afford to. This has been successful for us, but what we have is not enough. The solution to our problem is one that requires international commitment. It is not enough to criticize WMDs as a concept- it is foolish to assume that any rational nation would ever encourage the uncontrolled increase of any sort of weaponry. Equally ridiculous is the position that counties ought to secure their WMDs better. The threats associated with nuclear theft exist for the country of origin as well as another potential target. WMD security can not be achieved through the efforts of a single nation; WMD security is a gradual process that must be achieved through the efforts of all nations.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Rwanda
Delegate Name: Max Sanders
School: Royal Oak High School

Terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction is a huge concern for Rwanda, for multiple reasons. Two big reasons are that in 1994 we experienced a mass genocide caused by civil war and we share a border with the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is currently in a civil war between rebel militias and the Congolese government. Rwanda believes that a big issue that needs to be addressed in border control, the more we allow WMDs to travel across borders the more groups are going to be able obtain them and the harder it will become to secure them, so that’s where we need to start. It’s clear that border control between DR Congo and Rwanda is weak, because even with the institution of UN peace keepers militias in DR Congo were still able to fire over the Rwandan border.

Rwanda is a firm believer in contributing equally. If we want to prevent weapons of mass destruction from traveling across borders then both countries on a border need to work to secure that border. Once the weapons of mass destruction are secure within borders it becomes that nation’s responsibility to secure the weapons from terrorists groups, but this becomes much easier if the weapons are secure within borders. Rwanda is part of the African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty, The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and multiple other similar treaties, we have agreed that weapons of mass destruction need to be eradicated. They are an international threat, but they become easier to deal with when they are secured at a national level.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Saudi Arabia
Delegate Name: Riley Mitchell
School: Saline High School

The issue of terrorists or terrorist groups acquiring weapons of mass destruction is a serious threat for the nation of Saudi Arabia. The nation of Saudi Arabia has struggled with charity organizations rerouting funds to militant organizations, and despite government crackdowns, these organizations have sprung up internationally under different names. Since the nation of Saudi Arabia is also home to the Islamic holy site of Mecca, practitioners of radical Islam have an opportunity to congregate during pilgrimages and fundraise for terrorist causes.

The nation of Saudi Arabia recognizes that terrorism is not only a serious threat to the health and safety of our nation, but to that of the international community. Thus, Saudi Arabia is interested in continuing it's work to curtail this threat through means such as prohibiting fundraising on the streets, monitoring charities financial records, and sponsoring campaigns to help educate the Saudi public about terrorists's fundraising methods.

Saudi Arabia is also an opponent of Middle Eastern nuclear proliferation and would be interested in measures to increase security for weapons stockpiles, particularly in the Middle East. Proliferation of other WMDs such as biochemical weaponry is also a concern of Saudi Arabia's, especially considering the recent usage of chemical warfare in the Syrian conflict. Saudi Arabia would support nonproliferation deals with nations known to possess such weapons, including measures that would curtail the abilities of nuclear development programs and an increase in communication between nations of the Middle East in particular.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: South Africa
Delegate Name: Mitchell Rewiako
School: Williamston High School

One of the worst things that could happen on this planet we call home would be for terrorists to obtain WMD’s. WMD’s are weapons of mass destruction, which are chemical, biological, nuclear, or radiological weapons. The people of this world would be put in grave danger if these weapons were to fall in to the wrong hands. Just one of these weapons has the ability to kill millions of people. Actions need to be taken to prevent terrorists from obtaining these weapons.

South Africa believes that nations should disarm their stockpiles of WMD’s. We have done this ourselves in 1989. If the rest of the world would disarm some if not all of their stockpiles this would make it increasingly difficult for terrorist organizations to acquire WMB’s. If the world adopts a treaty similar to the African Nuclear-Weapon Free Zone Treaty we could help prevent WMD’s from falling into the wrong hands. The African Nuclear-Weapon Free Zone Treaty bans the research, development, manufacturing, stockpiling, testing, possession, control or stationing of nuclear explosive devices. This would make it much harder for terrorists to acquire or produce their own WMD’s because there would be much less components to make WMD’s available to terrorists since countries would not be testing, researching, or producing WMD’s.

The United Nations needs to do everything within its power to stop terrorists from obtaining WMD’s. The United Nations need to put a treaty in place similar to the African Nuclear-Weapon Free Zone Treaty. South African also encourages its fellow nations to disarm most if not all of its stockpiles of WMD’s.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: South Korea
Delegate Name: Justin Aylsworth
School: Flint Southwestern Classical Academy

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) are still a concern in regards to international security. While they are limited, carefully controlled, and not produced as prolifically as they once were, the resources used to craft these weapons remain poorly guarded in some nations. This is a potential threat to the security of all nations and should be considered seriously. The Republic of Korea has agreed to the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) as part of our duty to agree to limit our production of dangerous weapons in the name of international security. We are prepared and willing to further discuss the handling of nuclear materials in order to improve international security.

While the production of WMDs is limited and carefully restricted, the materials and resources to create these weapons should be monitored and controlled with equal care. In the interest of preventing rogue groups such as terrorists and radicals from obtaining these materials and attacking nations, we encourage our fellow countries to secure their supplies of nuclear material. It would appear that securing one’s resources would be prudent and in the best interest of a nation, and The Republic of Korea fully expects other nations to agree with this sound logic. Are our fellow nations not concerned with their own safety? Would any country neglect its own security and risk being robbed?

The Republic of Korea strongly advises that fellow nations and countries cooperate with us to ensure the security of these potentially dangerous materials. Nations need to prevent nuclear materials from falling into the hands of groups with no alliances and no morals keeping them from attacking any one of us. We believe in the good sense of our fellow nations to help us prevent terrorists from acquiring means to create Weapons of Mass Destruction and call upon our allies and the United Nation to work with us in the interest of international security.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Sweden
Delegate Name: Gregory Poole
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

Although Sweden has had relatively little experience with the horrors of terrorism, it does not take much to realize the implications of an extremist group with hostile intentions getting their hands on a Weapon of Mass Destruction. However, even that term is ambiguous. What exactly is a WMD? It has never been defined definitively and, though used often, has no universally accepted meaning. It most commonly represents a biological, chemical, or nuclear weapon capable of hurting large numbers of people OR causing significant amounts of damage to structures OR causing damage to the biosphere in general. However, even this is ambiguous: not only is it not a single definition, it also isn’t specific. How many people? What counts as “significant” damage? Finally, there is the age-old question: What exactly is a terrorist organization?

Along with the issues in definition come issues with stockpiles. While one might think that nuclear weapons wouldn’t be an issue, as the only nations that have them are very small in number, that could, in fact, be very wrong. It is possible that these bases could be infiltrated and a weapon stolen. However, chemical and biological weapons are more of an issue because of their relative abundance in the world. Many countries have stockpiles of chemical weapons that, though they are rarely used, have the potential to devastate vast populations. Not only that, but they can also be stolen due to the lower security.

The Kingdom of Sweden wishes the world to live in peace and strives to make this a reality. However, no nation can achieve this goal alone. All nations must band together to fight these global threats and, together, they can defeat them. All nations must work towards unity and liberty in this world, both within their borders and outside them. It is the hope of the Kingdom of Sweden that the United Nations was not misnamed, that it can achieve its goal of freedom and prosperity worldwide. To achieve this, the Kingdom of Sweden suggests that the nations of the world engage in further disarmament. While this may strike some nations, most notably the nations in possession of nuclear weapons, as a risky and potentially catastrophic move, it makes logical sense. If there are no weapons for the terrorists to steal, they can’t steal them. Not only that, but there is no sense in retaining these weapons. The only current use for a nuclear weapon is that of a deterrent for other nations. However, if all nations that own them destroy their stockpiles, then there would be no reason for these deterrents to exist. Their only power after that is as a bargaining tool. It might be that the only reason these nations do not destroy their weapons is because they do not wish to lose their positions of power in the world. The same goes for chemical and biological weapons: so many rules govern their use that their only purpose is for bargaining. If these weapon were destroyed, not only would the threat of a terrorist organization getting their hands on one be gone, the world would also be free of the burden of fear that accompanies these tools of destruction.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Switzerland
Delegate Name: Kyra Pritchard
School: Kalamazoo Central High School

As a victim of radical attacks, Switzerland stands against terrorism with countries like America, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark. We have all experienced the attacks, the accusations of harboring radicals, and we all want to declare war on terrorism. However, since terrorist groups reside in some ally countries, that does not mean that our alliances shall be shattered, as it is only an attack on terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Peykar, and Green Cells. This only means we will prevent such groups from acquiring WMB (weapons of mass destruction)through means of an agreement between us, the United Nations.

As a member and delegate of Switzerland, I propose that we create an agreement outlining the following. We all must pledge to battle terrorism, to watch over any weapon sales, and to always keep an eye on anyone suspicious. However, this does not mean we should be spying on our citizens directly, nor should it be encouraged. What we should do is watch over sales on weapons, pay attention to detail of possible threats we may have overlooked, and generally minimize the amount of weapons sold. We are people of peace and neutrality, so it's only natural such a suggestion is made. However, if there is no agreement, one of us may be able to sacrifice, as it should be an opportunity cost for unhappy citizens rather than endangered citizens.

Thank you.

Resources:

1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/19/AR2006071901795.html

2. http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/topics/peasec/sec/fiter/intcol.html

3. http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/topics/peasec/sec/fiter/prothr.html

4. http://www.theguardian.com/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/50264

5. http://www.start.umd.edu/start/data_collections/tops/terrorist_organizations_by_country.asp?id=SZ

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Syria
Delegate Name: Nathaniel Millard
School: Forest Hills Central High School

The origins of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) can be traced back to the fourteenth century when the Tartars catapulted infested cadavers over city walls, resulting in over a third of Europeans being infected with the plague. Since then, there have been a myriad of occurrences throughout history that have precipitated the draconian use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Despite the great strides made at the Geneva Convention of 1949, countries still stockpile ordnances such as these under department umbrellas for defense and research. While this unequivocally poses the risk of these munitions falling into the hands of radical extremists, the Syrian government recognizes the importance of these protective measures and would like all fellow sovereign nations to remain cognizant of their responsibilities in safeguarding these weapons from subversive factions.

The Syrian government has a series of unconventional weapons caches strictly for defense purposes that are securely stored using responsible procedures. In light of recent events and in an attempt to showcase our government’s full transparency, our government has joined the Chemical Weapons Convention and agreed to host inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and UN inspectors to supervise the destruction of chemical arms. Syria, in addition to this solemn dedication to protect all foreign and domestic citizens, is a party to the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty. This republic also strictly abides by a Comprehensive Nuclear Safeguards Agreement set in place by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

It is imperative to global security that all nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons are handled, transported, and secured in a prudent and pragmatic manner. In alignment of these initiatives, Syrian delegates would implore the committee to pass a resolution that held all nations responsible for the protection of their own armaments. The delegation of the Syrian Arab Republic believes it would benefit all states to limit the imperialist control of these weapons while keeping them out of the reach of terrorist organizations with fanatical agendas.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Thailand
Delegate Name: Grace Cutler
School: Royal Oak High School

WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) are a threat to world safety and have been for quite some time. There are very few stockpiles of unsecured WMD's, however they are still out there and if the wrong people get their hands on WMD's the result could be catastrophic. There are certain measures we must take to prevent mass destruction, and coming together to work on the issue is the first.

As a country Taiwan does not possess any nuclear weapons currently, we are not part of the threat. We are looking into the idea of starting a nuclear weapons program. We are members of the Treaty of Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons, this means that our country put the security of our people above all else. we are implementing more safeguards just to be sure that everything is kept safely and securely.

Although we believe in safe use of WMD's our neighbors are not of the same mind. Ever since we split from China, there has been tension between our two countries. china has nuclear weapons, and if tension were to increase we would have to defend ourselves. We however would not threaten anyone with nuclear weapons and believe that the international community and countries alike should do everything in their power to secure chemical weapons. We will continue to work with the UN and the rest of the world to keep WMD's out of the wrong hands. It is our job to keep the world safe, clean, and prosperous.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Turkey
Delegate Name: Owen Slubowski
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

The attempt to control the use and the distribution of nuclear weapons has been a problem for about 45 years. It was started with the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons treaty. The nonproliferation treaty favors the responsible use of nuclear technology and recognizes a nations individual right to use nuclear tech, it also promotes the disarmament of nuclear weapons. The threat of nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands is an ever present threat. These weapons are capable of destroying hundreds of thousands of lives. it is a problem that needs to be controlled.

Turkey is a member of NATO. We are also involved in nuclear sharing with Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. In nuclear sharing countries, is when countries get nuclear weapons from other countries who create them. But must have NATOs approval to use them. We have 60 to 70 US tactical nuclear weapons. we believe that nuclear weapons become a problem when they fall into the wrong hands. Turkey has also signed the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons treaty. The nonproliferation treaty favors the responsible use of nuclear technology and recognizes a nations individual right to use nuclear tech, it also promotes the disarmament of nuclear weapons. Turkey and the US are very close allies. We have also tried to join the European Union. We have a big interest in nuclear reactors. My country supports the Syrian rebels. My country and Iran are in dispute over Syria because Iran supports the Syrian government and Iran supports the rebels. We have a early warning system, it is to help counter possible missiles coming from Iran. turkey has tried to make peace with countries across oceans to help contribute to world peace. Turkey tries to operate on a win win principal. Turkey has the second largest standing army in NATO. Turkey tries to have “ no problems with neighbors”.

To solve this, I propose that we put very strict limitations on the sale of nuclear material and the sale of nuclear weapons so that terrorists can’t obtain or build nuclear weapons.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Turkmenistan
Delegate Name: Sean Tarr
School: Royal Oak High School

Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) have always been a major concern to the United Nations due to the immense dangers brought upon by the weapons. These dangers are heightened even more so if the weapons were to get into the hands of terrorist groups. Turkmenistan is concerned with this matter for the international safety risks that occur when WMD are under the control of terrorist groups and we believe that there must precautions made in each nation in preventing these groups from getting the weapons .

Turkmenistan has taken many steps towards preventing the spread throughout our and borders. Under Article 6 of the Constitutional Law of Turkmenistan on the permanent neutrality of Turkmenistan, Turkmenistan shall not possess, produce or disseminate nuclear, chemical, bacteriological or other types of weapons of mass destruction, nor shall it allow the placement on its territory of military bases of foreign States. And under the Military Doctrine of independent and permanently neutral Turkmenistan, and Article 5 of the Counter-Terrorism Act, Turkmenistan will not possess WMD or help fund terrorist groups attempting to get them. Along with these documents preventing nuclear WMD in our home country, Turkmenistan has prohibited the transit of WMD through our airspace. These steps in preventing terrorist groups acquiring the weapons should be taken by others as to ensure international safety.

Border control and trade restrictions are issues best handled between each state as the enforced controls are already high enough. Money in developing nations is not as easily spent as it may be in developed nations, and with heightened border control and trade restriction, large amounts of money being spent is required. The funding for these border control and trade restrictions could be used more effectively if used to improve the economic foundation if a country, as less terroristic groups are likely to form in an economically thriving nation.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: United Arab Emirates
Delegate Name: Connor Renckly
School: Fishers High School

Most nations will agree that any weapon poses a great danger when placed in the wrong hands; it should come as no surprise then that weapons of mass destruction are potentially one of the greatest risks to world wide security. Often the mere thought of a WMD (Weapon of Mass Destruction) falling into the wrong hands is enough to bring entire nations to the brink of war, any country or anyone in possession of a WMD or anything that could easily converted to serve the purpose of one takes on a grim and immense responsibility. It is the belief of the United Arab Emirates that any country in possession of such a power should treat it with the utmost fear and respect. Further more, the only justification for any power to be in control of a WMD is for protection of their own people and the security of the countries that protection is extended to. In short, the only countries that should be granted the privilege to possess WMDs are those that intend to never utilize them for any purpose.

The United Arab Emirates as a whole is highly honored to be upheld as a paragon of Nuclear safety, we are held in high esteem by many of our fellow DISEC member nations as being one of the best examples of adherence to the present regulations regarding WMDs and related matters. We hope to use our unique position of sharing a cultural and societal background with many of our neighboring nations as well as our peaceful and productive relations with countries like France and the United States to bring order and balance to this matter. While we are slightly apprehensive at the direct statement of anti-terrorism being the sole focus of our current efforts the United Arab Emirates is fully prepared to stand with our western partners in this matter, not only to better regulate WMDs but to ensure the security of any potential materials for the production of these weapons as well.

The United Arab Emirates firmly believes that in the ever changing and highly connected state of modern international affairs no one country can take the responsibility of producing or owning a WMD, to do so would be vastly irresponsible and would not only endanger the nation in question but the safety and stability of all other countries as well. We as a nation are fully convinced that any country even remotely concerned for the safety of its citizens will understand the immense danger and potentially catastrophic results of unregulated WMDs. We enter these discussions with the hope that other countries will understand our concerns and be willing to enter negotiations with other world powers to ensure that the people our nations are supposed to protect never have to face the horrific damages a WMD can and will bring.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: United Kingdom
Delegate Name: Joseph Murphy
School: Vicksburg High School

The spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) poses a threat to the UK and the international community. Indiscriminate trade in conventional arms and the use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) weapons and ballistic missiles raises serious humanitarian and security concerns.The untied kingdom firmly believes in the U.N. policy of nuclear disarmament and would strongly advise stricter regulations. the untied kingdom would also recommend that the country's of Iran and north Korea be denied the use of nuclear weapons of any kind.We are also supporting the full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to refrain from supporting non-government agents from developing, acquiring, manufacturing, possessing, transporting, transferring or using nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their delivery systems.

The untied kingdom would also support any measures to remove all bio and chemical weapons from the hands of all country's and have them destroyed safely.The UK has signed up to the global implementation of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC). The purpose of the convention is to help prevent states acquiring or keeping biological and toxin weapons, and prevent them ever being used by states or terrorists.

The untied kingdom recommends that these steps be taken.improving the security of fissile materials,reducing the number of sites containing nuclear and radio-logical material,preventing the acquisition of proliferation-relevant information and expertise by terrorists. the united kingdom is also willing to help fund projects when necessary. The unitied kingdom also supports the idea to build up the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), UN and other organisations and treaties that help us meet our goals through the international community and which help to protect global security and prosperity.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: United States
Delegate Name: Alexander Fruin
School: Mattawan High School

The accessibility of weapons of mass destruction is an issue that could jeopardize the stability of the global community, and the United States is at the forefront in the effort to eliminate this terrorism. As the implications of radical ideologists’ attacks are felt throughout the globe, it is necessary that the United Nations, as an international body, suggests measures to insure worldwide security. If a nation is incapable of suppressing a threat that may cause dangerous repercussions, it may entitle other nations to intervene in the matter, despite DISEC’s respect towards national sovereignty.

America’s Department of Homeland Security uses nuclear detection and forensic missions in order to prevent terrorist attacks. This department organizes the development of the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, which is a layer of defense that is focused on preventing nuclear as well as radiological threats. These methods are used throughout the country and its borders as well as regions within other countries. In collaboration with USA’s Departments of Energy and Defense, the nation is working to create a force of weapons experts. Comprehensive regulatory framework can be used to determine the priorities of law enforcement agencies and inspections in regards of biological weapons. The impact of unmonitored manufacturing could spell far-reaching disaster if extremists were able to procure these powerful materials; the United States understands the necessity of strict border controls. Another program that has proven to be successful for America is the public awareness campaign that encourages any suspicions about possibly dangerous activity regarding weapons to be disclosed to a government official. This effort unites citizens with law enforcement.

On an international level, the United States clearly has a dominant role in detecting nuclear threats, and also values the instruction of personnel related to detection and handling of nuclear weapons. This advanced line of professionals would be trained in order to dismantle stockpiles of WMDs, and could also be used to provide security to the remaining weapons. America would not support a qualm of a nation that merely objected to an observation of any nuclear materials or energy sources, as this action would be used by an agency to ascertain the stable nature of the facility’s procedures. The Department of Homeland Security would be eager to spread the ideas towards protecting a nation if other countries are more inclined to choose methods that support national sovereignty, but the US also understands the vitality of securing international safety.

Topic: Measures to Prevent Terrorists from Acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction
Country: Venezuela
Delegate Name: Ryan VanZalen
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

The issue of unsecure WMDs and WMD components is a major concern for international security. While certain measures have been taken in restricting WMDs, such as the NPT treaty, more needs to be done regarding the poorly secured stockpiles of WMDs that are susceptible to being taken by terrorist organizations. Yet, the rights of nations to nuclear resources must not be violated so a resolution should be made with the consent of the nation in which the weapons are located.

Venezuela is a member of the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (Tlatelolco Treaty), the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). We believe that terrorist acquisition of WMDs is a serious issue that must be addressed. The issue of securing WMDs must be addressed without violating independent nations and a resolution must be made with international cooperation while respecting the rights of independent states.

As a resolution we propose a plan to implement new technology and security measures to WMD and WMD component stockpiles which are currently at risk. The goal would be to better secure weapons from terrorist or extremist acquisition which would be a worldwide threat. The implementation of new security technology would reduce risk while respecting the rights of independent states. Another resolution that would reduce risk is, with the independent states consent, to take old WMD stockpiles and disarm them and transport them to a safer location and/or dispose of them in a way that would not endanger the environment. The implementation and specific details of this plan would need to be worked out by the UN.