Question of Palestinian Statehood

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Afghanistan
Delegate Name: Shawn Anderson
School: Roeper School

The suffering of the Palestinian people has long been a source of distress for Afghanistan. Our brothers and sisters in Palestine have suffered far too long, and Afghanistan believes that now is the time to recognize them in the community of nations. It is the firm belief of Afghanistan that Palestine be granted full statehood, as well as full membership in the United Nations.

Afghanistan believes that it is time for the Israeli occupation of Palestine to end. Innocent Palestinians are killed every day. In 2012 alone, 6622 Palestinians were killed, 6569 by Israeli security forces, and 53 by Israeli civilians. However, Afghanistan accepts that Palestinian terrorists have killed 1097 Israeli civilians and security forces. (Israeli Information Center for Human Rights) However, Afghanistan does not believe that the Palestinian citizens be punished for crimes of terrorists.

Afghanistan disapproves of Israel for refusal to enter negotiations with Palestine, and is using the “Peace Process” as an excuse for inaction, delay, and avoidance of any substantive resolution of the issues dividing the two parties. Afghanistan believes that Israel’s complete denial of the possibility of a Palestinian state is counterproductive. Afghanistan believes that talks need to be started between Palestine and Israel in order to take the first step towards peace in the region. Afghanistan also believes that the Palestinian Authority should be recognized as a government, both by the global community, and Israel, to create peace.

Afghanistan hopes that the nations of this committee can work closely together, to begin peace talks, and to guarantee statehood for Palestine. Afghanistan looks forward to working with all nations to hopefully resolve this important issue.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Argentina
Delegate Name: Caleb Welsh
School: Mattawan High School

In 1948, Israel was introduced as a state. Since then, it's neighbors, including Syria, Lebanon and Jordan have been included in five wars against them. Palestinians believe that Israel, or parts of Israel such as the Gaza Strip and West bank, should be controlled by Palestinian states or be different states in themselves. After World War II, many people of Jewish heritage who fled Europe had nowhere to go. The United Nations created the state of Israel for these refugees to go to. This was supposed to be considered as a haven; however, it's neighbors threaten the safety of the civilians.

The question of Palestinian statehood doesn't directly affect Argentinian lifestyles, but the conflict needs to be resolved. Israel should maintain it's statehood without losing land that belongs to them. The Palestinian peoples should show tolerance for the Israeli statehood. It's not Palestine's right to claim Israel, when Israel is already an independent nation. Peace should be maintained in the middle-east, and if Palestine refuses to stop the claiming of Israeli land, peace will never be accomplished. Civilians on both sides of the conflict are being killed unnecessarily and the conflict should be resolved.

Israel's goal is to maintain a state, harboring and keeping safe it’s people. Argentina believes that Israel’s refusal to negotiate without preconditions reasonable. First and foremost, the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian states should be resolved with as little bloodshed as possible. Israel has the rights and has owned the West Bank and Gaza Strip for over 60 years, and Argentina holds the view that they belong to Israel.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Azerbaijan
Delegate Name: Matt Miller
School: Royal Oak High School

The issue of Palestinian statehood has dominated Middle Eastern relations for the past half century. Azerbaijan would like to propose a simple two state solution: one sovereign nation located in the Gaza Strip, and one located in West Bank. While Azerbaijan recognizes and respects the sovereignty of the two parties involved, both sides must realize that their pointless bickering and squabbling is affecting the economy of the entire region and poisoning relations with their neighbors.

Military intervention (in order to keep the peace in the interim) should be avoided at all costs, as an armed conflict will only create greater problems. For this same reason, the Special Political Committee should recommend to the Security Council that peacekeepers should be avoided at all costs.

In order to negotiate a deal, an arbitrary third party should be asked to mediate. Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations, would fill this position perfectly. Mr. Annan has worldwide recognition as a diplomatic superstar, and he has no further commitments since his resignation as special envoy to Syria.

Azerbaijan favors economic cooperation with both the Israelis and the Palestinians. Tariffs affecting one state or the other would only create further tension and destroy the work of the Special Political committee.

Lastly, even though the city of Jerusalem is widely recognized as the capital of Israel, it is a sacred city for three of the world’s largest monotheistic religions: Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. The committee should not overlook the preservation of Jerusalem as a site of holy pilgrimage.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Bangladesh
Delegate Name: Rubee Sandhu
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

The People’s Republic of Bangladesh believes that involving the issue of Palestinian statehood, Palestine should receive full independence from Israel. As a country, we were also in a similar situation when we separated during the Partition and then again in 1971 from Pakistan. Although the separations caused chaos and much causality, we do not regret going through them. We believe that if Palestine does achieve statehood, they will be well off and become a fully independent country, and would be able to contribute to the world as a whole.

It is understandable why the Israel and Palestine cannot reach a compromise: two governments trying to run one country, and neither one is going to back down. This obstacle is very hard to maneuver around because neither one will want to lose its power over the country as a whole. One solution to this problem would be making both sides accept the existence of the other. Both sides have political views that go against the other and in this case we suggest that the UN come with a resolution that would come up with compromises that benefit both sides. Considering all resolutions presented thus far have been rejected, the UN will have to continue to provide newer ones and eventually both sides will have to agree. The situation they are currently in really only has two ways it could go: Palestine not getting its complete independence and continued fighting between the two sides or separate countries are formed in a peaceful settlement.

If Palestine were to ever become its own country, its government should be set up in a democratic form where the people have the most say In what goes on in the country. This way, the opinions of the people will be the rule of the country and because none of them will want to go through the same fear they faced during the separation from Israel, the government would most likely be peaceful.

We the People’s Republic of Bangladesh believe that Palestine should become its own country. This act will discontinue the hostilities and with the help of the UN, we believe that it is not far from happening. It will take some work for both sides to agree to a compromise, but it will have to happen at some point.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Barbados
Delegate Name: Charlie Coon
School: Williamston High School

The problems between Israel and Palestine have been affecting the entire world for way too long now. In the last sixty years, since the founding of Israel, there has been constant conflict between Israel and Palestine. The Palestinians feel that this is their home territory since they have occupied the land for over fourteen hundred years. The Israelis feel that this is their homeland since Father Abraham established the faith of Judaism in the same territory. In the last couple of decades, the violence has increased as Palestinians push for their own homeland while the Israelis fight to protect their own homeland. Clearly this is an issue that must be solved at this conference.

Our great country is very concerned with this conflict because we are always worried when innocent lives are being lost. And though we are allies with Israel, we do believe that Palestine should be recognized as a state and should be a part of the United Nations. We believe that Palestine should receive one quarter of their desired land and that the rest stays with Israel.

In our committee we will look to work with resolutions that will recognize Palestine as a state but will also be some what fair to Israel and their wishes. We will look to work with our friends from the Caribbean and will also look to work with the United States. We also would love to work with our friends from Africa in the great country of Zimbabwe.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Bolivia
Delegate Name: Cameron Clark
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

In March of 2010 President Morales announced that he had made Bolivia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood official in a letter to the chairman of the Palestine liberation organization Mahmoud Abbas. This was after Bolivia had broke relations with Israel in 2009 in response to the Battle of al-Furqan, and the decision followed suit as neighbors like Brazil who have stated their recognition of statehood.

During the enouncement Morales said “Bolivia could not continue with its arms crossed, waiting and watching, in the face of problems over human rights problems and territorial issues and sovereignty that Palestine confronts." Despite this we are not currently in diplomatic relations. We find that the intervention must be carried out cautiously as to avoid the recreating the results of US and Soviet support of revolutionary movements and regimes in Latin America during the cold war, and feel that the support of the current Israel regime has created a damaging influence that aggravates Israeli-Palestinian relations and that some elements of the establishment result in violent confrontational policy. It is imperative for outside states to restrain their influence; we must avoid imperialist action.

Israel has enjoyed the US's protection and support as maintenance of their alliance is political pressure point that is exploited as policy favoring Israel is expected to benefit candidates' campaigns during election. The US government's efforts to maintain this alliance has lead them to avoid confronting Israel on policy has both lead to the US alienating Israel's neighbors and creating its own enemies, and for the Israeli government to continue a confrontational attitude as it expects us support. The condition's are set for abuse to take place that aggravate militant groups to violent retaliation.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Brazil
Delegate Name: Victoria Spiegel
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

The long conflict between Palestine and Israel has cost both parties thousands upon thousands of lives. Escalating violence and increased tension between the two peoples only intensifies the urgency of the issue of Palestinian Statehood, and it is vital that the discord and disagreement surrounding this issue be settled peacefully, with a sustainable and durable solution that brings justice to both Israel and Palestine.

Brazil places full support behind the just cause of the Palestinian people. We recognize and advocate a Palestine State within the borders of 1967, with Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinian people aspire to establish a secure, united, democratic, geographically cohesive, and economically viable Palestinian State, coexisting peacefully with Israel, and Brazil supports these ideals of a two-state solution. The international community must recognize Palestine’s legitimate right to sovereignty and self-determination, which will only strengthen the possibilities of peace and reduce the current asymmetry between the two parties. We also support the right of Israel to live in peace with her neighbors, and we recognize Israel’s valid concerns for safety and security. Brazil firmly stresses the importance of the ending of settlement activity by Israel in Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem. We also stress the importance of the reactions and approaches of Israel and United States, and we would ask all involved parties to realize the necessity of accepting Palestine as an equal and legitimate negotiating partner. Above all, Brazil seeks a peaceful solution brought about by negotiations and diplomacy, not violence. We recognize that there will be no durable peace without painful concessions from both sides; however, Brazil strongly believes that a nonviolent, sustainable solution is on the horizon.

In addition to political efforts to promote peace, Brazil maintains support of Palestinian development. In 2007, Brazil made a donation worth $10 million to Palestine, which is being used to further the education, public health, and urban infrastructure of the West Bank. We have pledged an additional $15 million to be used for Gaza reconstruction. Brazil also provides extensive monetary support to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestine refugees, and we continue to be a country that receives Palestinian refugees in need.

Brazil defends and advocates the inclusion of new participants in the seeking of a peaceful solution between Palestine and Israel. We are convinced that expanding the conversations to a broader group will allow the introduction of fresh ideas and contributions. Though the main elements of a peace accord have long been on the table, and we do not mean to reinvent the wheel, Brazil holds that new actors will further lateral thinking on the ways by which to implement these elements. Brazil advocates the creation of a small support group composed of interested countries with international credibility and good relations with all parties, to advance and assist in the negotiations between Israel and Palestine. This urgent issue, perhaps the most important predicament regarding international peace and security we face today, must be addressed quickly and with diplomacy. On the question of Palestinian Statehood, the United Nations must be on the right side of history.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Canada
Delegate Name: Natalie Ciocca
School: Fishers High School

Given the nature of the Israeli Palestinian war, Canada strongly believes that the UN should not recognize Palestine as in independent country at this time. While the delegation from Canada recognizes the fight for independence, we are also a strong proponent for promoting peaceful international relations. With the amount of deliberation that still needs to take place, Canada feels strongly that given more time, a compromise can and will be reached in the future.

Furthermore, we feel as though the security of Israel is a problem in this state of increasing violence. Along with the United States and as members of the UN , we would like to see that these countries are able to resolve conflict as soon as possible, however, this process will continue to be long and arduous. The recognition of statehood at this time would only lead to increased violence and escalating international instability. Involving the UN in the conflict can only go so far. It is up to the country to create a resolution that which they are able to abide by and respect.

The conflict goes back to the 20's with nationalist movements for Judaism and Arabs. Both of these countries wanted sovereignty as part of a larger Arab- Israeli conflict. While other countries signed an armistice in the 40's with Israel, Palestine had had borders proposed for their own state within Israel. However, this had come with strict martial law for the Palestinians who remained. Just after the six day war that had taken place on the Gaza strip, the UN had issues a resolution to help with the Palestinian refugee problem. Palestinians say that they are very willing to return to these pre 1967 borders, however, this should also require full cooperation and agreement with Israel. As per the Six Day War and Oslo accord, Israel is hesitant to discuss any possible statehood of Palestine. This should be respected by the UN.

We ask that the UN seriously consider the potential setbacks that would take place if statehood were to be granted. By following the example set forth by the United States, we can ensure that the UN will make a decision that is to the benefit of both countries involved.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Central African Republic
Delegate Name: Justin Hoikka
School: Mattawan High School

The Central African Republic feels that resolving the violence between Palestine and Israel should be the first priority. Outside sources may need to intervene to reach this peace. As long as there are acts of terror occurring as a result of this violence, uninvolved countries nearby may be affected. Our number one goal should be to limit the number of deaths as a result of this conflict.

Since 1947 Israel has obtained more control of the land that was once Palestine and even goes so far as to beat and kill innocent Palestinians. Millions of Palestinians have been relocated to outside countries, away from their homeland. Once the Palestinians and Israelis have stopped the violence, an agreement can be reached. Palestine should receive full statehood and be reimbursed for the years of abuse that they have endured from Israel. Palestine should at least be given the West Bank and the Gaza strip as originally declared in 1947. The Central African Republic realizes Israel's desire to remain in control of the current land but also recognizes Palestine's right to this land that they rightfully claimed decades ago.

With both Palestine and Israel being recognized as a country, they can develop their own government to become successful. Carefully drawn borders can result in peace between these two aggressors once and for all. United Nations involvement may be necessary to reach this agreement and to create fair borders. The millions relocated people can be brought home and the unjust treatment against Palestinians will cease.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: China
Delegate Name: Paul Farah
School: Flint Southwestern Classical Academy

Let us say that I come and take your candy bar and tell you that it is mine now and that you can have just a little portion of it back. You, however, want the whole candy bar back and will stop at nothing in order to get it back. This is the same situation that Palestine and Israel have been in for many years now. We the United Nations, as a whole, need to create a plan in order to get these two nations to stop the violence. After we stop the violence, we need to decide whether or not Palestine should get statehood and if so, what form. It is among the best interest of every country to get these Palestine and Israel to stop fighting. This is the first step in bringing peace in the Middle East.

The People’s Republic of China firmly believes that Palestine should receive full statehood with East Jerusalem as its capital. It is an inalienable right that we should not be withholding from the Palestinian people. The People’s Republic of China knows exactly what Palestine is going through at this moment in time. We were once under the control of another country until we broke away and became our own nation. As you can see, we are doing exceptionally well. China believes that if we give Palestine the chance to gain full statehood and some time to develop, they can become a strong independent nation. Palestine was admitted into the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) due to ECOSOC resolution 2089. China believes that Palestine should receive full statehood and we will give them our support.

The People’s Republic of China believes that Palestine should keep arguing for full statehood. China will back them up and support their fight back against the imperialists known as the Israelis. In order to create peace between Palestine and Israel, the western nations need to stop interfering and keep their own selfish views to themselves. Until then, China will support the efforts put forth by Palestine for full statehood and for getting their country back.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Colombia
Delegate Name: Hannon Hylkema
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

The duality which is Israel and Palestine is a confusing and sticky situation. Israel is fighting Palestine and vice versa, they are two separate countries but in the space of one country, their borders are clear but disregarded. Currently Israel is considered a sovereign nation by the United Nations but Palestine is not. As of September 2011, Palestine had already applied for statehood, but at this time they still remain exempt from the workings of the U.N. Palestine would obviously like the council to vote so they could become a state, but currently the Colombian delegation believes that it would be best if the other members of the assembly would join us in abstinence of this vote. This would be best for everybody because firstly the United States are attempting to sway the votes of those in the Security Council, to vote down the application of Palestine. Secondly important negotiations should be ongoing between the bilateral diplomacy that is Israel and Palestine, to ensure peace in the state. Thirdly, on a sidenote we could observe the workings of the Sudan and South Sudan as a model for peaceful resolution. Independance must be recognized by both parties to successfully achieve an ideal end result.

France and England have decided to abstain in this vote contrary to the efforts of their counterpart the United States. We believe this is the correct methodology when it comes to this topic. But another just as correct way to get around an unjust final decision would be to block the vote from ever occurring.

What we see ahead of us is more violence due to the outcome of a vote. If no vote took place or all parties of the assembly abstained Israel and Palestine could continue to work through their unfinished business. The truly optimal solution would end with Israel recognizing the independence of Palestine before a vote was taken so as to refrain from hurt feelings.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Congo
Delegate Name: Jeffrey Ohl
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

The Democratic Republic of Congo believes that the question of Palestinian statehood has to be answered soon due to the large amounts of violence and many deaths associated with the issue. Nearly fifteen thousand lives have been lost due to the war since it started more than six decades ago. We believe that both Palestine and Israel are at fault regarding this issue. By this we mean that by now both parties could have made compromises to end the conflict. We believe that the most successful compromise would involve a two state solution – the type of solution that has polled most favorably with both Israelis and Palestinians.

A two state solution would mean that Israel would remain its own state and Palestine would most likely get the West Bank* and the Gaza Strip from Israel, effectively establishing a Palestinian state in those places. In exchange for the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, Israel would get to keep Jerusalem. This would allow both the Palestinians and the Israelis to have enough space to live. In addition to this, Israel would have to stop building settlements in Palestine, otherwise there would be no point in giving the Palestinians the land. The Israelis should also have a more reasonable number of checkpoints at Palestinian borders. Along with a reduction in the number of checkpoints, the Israel Defense Forces would have to make sure the operators of the checkpoints stopped the abuse and humiliation of Palestinians who passed through, such as the strip searches of men, women, and even young girls that have occurred in the past. They should also try to make it take less time for Palestinians to go to Israel and vice versa. While it is possible this would be a risk to Israeli security, due to the fact that there would be less control and monitoring of all Palestinians entering the country, it might actually improve the situation because it would mean there would be less resentment from Palestinians, which could in turn lead to less violent conflict. Also, the people who operate the checkpoints would still be able to stop anyone that they deemed a threat from going through, they would just have to be less excessive about it.

Thus, the Congo believes a two-state solution is the best answer to the question of Palestinian statehood, with compromises from both parties allowing for mutual happiness.

*Excluding Jerusalem

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Costa Rica
Delegate Name: Nick Partin
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

The current conflict in Israel is escalating more and more as time passes gas. If something is not done soon then even more violence will continue. Violence is something nobody wants, so the two state solutions, which have already been proposed, would be very helpful to this situation.

This conflict has raged on for much too long and it has to end now. The situation began with more and more Israelis coming to live in Palestine. The Palestinians took note of this and wanted the Israelis out. Before long the Israelis began forcing the Palestinians out of their own land. Situations began to escalate, and the Israelis began to use violence to force out the Palestinians. Not long after, Palestinians began fleeing Palestine so they would not have to face this violence. The repeated abuse that the Palestinians are suffering is unbearable. The Israeli control is becoming too large to control and we need to act fast before it is too late.

The “two state solution” is one that we back all the way. The solution provides both sides with land and it would stop the violence. The solution provides Palestinians with an independent state. If this was possible we might be able to provide these two peoples with peace. This solution would solve the problem with as little violence as possible, which is what everybody (hopefully) wants.

In conclusion if we can get both peoples to cooperate, we could provide both with a place to live. A Palestinian state would provide peace for the Palestinians and would hopefully allow the Israelis to leave them alone. Always remember, Violence is never the answer!

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Croatia
Delegate Name: Christian Thomas
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

So the republic of Croatia is in favor of Palestine and Israel coexisting as two separate states. We as a country think that even though this dispute is hotly debated that we should find a way to divide up the land so that everyone gets something.

Croatia formalized relations with the PNA in March 2011. The dispute between Israel and Palestine and the republic of Croatia tends to think it boils down to a religious stand point of Jesus returning to the holy land and since most of the world is dominated by religion and the belief that Jesus Christ will one day return to the holy land, a lot of the world supports Israel, but the middle east ironically does not which is where Israel is located,

If you are involved with this conflict it boils down to, do Palestinians deserve the statehood or not. Are our deeply held religious beliefs wrong? Have we been wrong about how the world works for five thousand years or so? These are the questions we need to ask the world. Should we support a belief that is most likely wrong and contradicts what we know about science.

The thing Croatia wants is something that everyone wants which is to have a place to call home and be proud of it. Where are Palestinian kids supposed to say they’re from? There definitely is a way Palestine and Israel can have a country, there just has to be give and take.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Cuba
Delegate Name: Connor Dorman
School: Mattawan High School

The battle for Palestinian statehood has been raging for decades now, with little to no progress. This is undoubtedly because of the harsh positions Israel, Palestine, and each of their respected allies have taken. When two opposing sides take such rigid and harsh views, it is difficult to come to a compromise. Cuba recognizes that each country has its own opinions and ideas about Palestinian Statehood and wants to help facilitate a solution that pleases both parties involved. Cuba also wants to point out that the Palestinian population has been and still is a victim of continual violence and suppression.

Palestine should be given full statehood with East Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinian people deserve this, and it rightfully belongs to them. However, Cuba recognizes that Palestine’s unilateral approach is not always effective. In some instances this approach can lead to violence and further prevent the ultimate goal of peace and prosperity. Cuba wants to also emphasize that Israel’s allies such as the United States are helping promote this violence by providing dangerous arms and munitions. Cuba wishes to stress that not only does Israel need to consider compromises, but its allies as well.

Israel does not want Palestinian statehood to be recognized on any level, and it is wrongly supported by countries like the United States. Israel’s unwillingness to even discuss solutions without certain preconditions is making the journey to peace more difficult for all parties involved. Cuba wishes Israel to consider alternative solutions to peace outside of what its allies are promoting. If Israel refuses to consider other views on this matter, peace will be nearly un-attainable. A compromise of some form is a solution that should not be out ruled in this situation.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Czech Republic
Delegate Name: Noah Attal
School: Forest Hills Eastern High School

The bid for Palestinian Statehood in the United Nations is only the most recent of event in the arduous conflict between Israel and Palestine. Its roots lay in the foundations for Israel created by the United Nations in Resolution 181 (1948) and the justified existence of Israel on ancient Israeli homeland from that year forward. After the 6 Days War the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 242 (1967). This redefined Israeli and Palestinian boards and is the basis of the Palestinian Movement 194 for statehood that has been in question. The bid seeks to gain collective recognition of a Palestinian State on the pre-67 boarders of Palestine as well as full membership for the Palestinian State in the United Nations before they return to negotiation with its willing partner Israel; these are unilateral prerequisites the United States has promised to veto. Prime Minister of the Czech Republic Petr Neças has publicly stated, “We are convinced that any unilateral steps will only harm the peace process." Unilateral actions are not gateways to peace.

The Czech Republic strongly urges Palestine to reconsider its proposal for statehood for it only hinders the peace making process. Furthermore the splintered and rival fractions within Palestine do not represent a functional government which to bestow Statehood onto. Only this year over 800 missiles have been launched from Gaza into Israel. Obviously the terrorist groups within the country are not under control and pose a legitimate threat to Israeli security. Let first peace be obtained between Israel and Palestine with bilateral negotiations without preconditions. President Václav Klaus said in a foreign relations speech “There is no shortcut to the end of the conflict that has endured for decades. It requires both sides to take an innovative approach and overcome some old inflexible and rigid schemes of thought. It requires both sides to negotiate and to find a balanced solution, which will last. Such a solution cannot come through unilateral steps, neither those forced by the UN, nor steps taken by one side of the dispute only.” Let us, the United Nations, support peace and not prolonged conflict.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Denmark
Delegate Name: Ryusuke Saito
School: Fishers High School

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict has been ongoing since 1948. Post WWII, the State of Israel was formed and since the formation of the State of Israel the conflict has become worse. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which has been an ongoing issue since 1948, has caused harm to the lives of many citizens in the region. Wars such as the Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War have been fought between the two states for sovereignty over the region. The creation of the state of Israel has caused outrage from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and other nations in the region. The Kingdom of Denmark, during those times, have assisted the refugees to safety in Denmark.

The Kingdom of Denmark is a strong supporter of the creation of the Palestinian state while in discussion with the State of Israel and State of Palestine in a peaceful manner that will not cause harm to the region. The Kingdom of Denmark supports the creation of the Palestinian state and the upgrade of the Palestinian status in the United Nations; however, the only true method of resolving this situation is if, and only if, the State of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization negotiate further. The main obstacle the PLO must overcome is the negotiations between Israel and Palestine. Without this negotiation done in a peaceful manner, Palestine will not gain its sovereignty. Denmark has supported initiatives such as the Road Map for Peace, United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees, Negotiations Affairs Department of the PLO, Cultural Outreach and Engagement Program, Middle East Regional Agriculture Program, and Temporary International Presence in Hebron. The Kingdom of Denmark has also aided in the safety of Palestinian citizens in the 1980s during the Lebanese Civil War. The Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) has assisted in the development of Palestine over the years due to the living conditions in which many Palestinians face, such as poverty, violence, and instability.

The Kingdom of Denmark believes that Palestine should be recognized as a state and be given an upgraded status within the United Nations. The failing talks between Israel and Palestine does not mean that the talks should come to an end, but that there are better methods in which communication between the two can be done through the United Nations in a peaceful, non-violent manner that would not harm the citizens of the area on both sides of the issue. The United Nations Special Political Committee must intervene in the Israel-Palestine conflict in order to prevent further violence.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Dominican Republic
Delegate Name: Mandie Short
School: Mattawan High School

This is a serious topic of a country leaving and becoming independent. The Dominican Republic realizes this, but this topic is not relevant. The Dominican Republic does believe in the independence of nations and recognizes the request form the Palestinians.

The Dominican Republic agrees with Hati. An ideal solution would be to divide the two states, supplying each with equal land. It is important to create borders for these two states to maintain the necessary cities and landmarks within each country. The Palestinians are in control of the Gaza Strip and West Bank and should remain in the control of Palestine along with the largest city, Gaza. A compromise to connect the west bank and the Gaza strip under Palestinian. Giving Israel full control of Jerusalem may be a practical solution. There also needs to be a treaty signed stating that they need to maintain peace.

If necessary for peace, there may be a wall built for privacy and an agreement that both countries can agree on dealing with peace and distribution of land. The Domican Republic would also like to make sure that the United Nations keeps a follow up on the situation. Also, if there is conflict that the United Nations needs to maintain the peace and make sure there are no out breaks of war. We are not trying to cause any conflict between the two countries. We understand the need for peach and are willing to support the United Nations decision.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Egypt
Delegate Name: Savannah Bratcher
School: Fishers High School

The Republic of Egypt strongly believes that Palestine should become an independent state. Egypt hopes to back Palestine in the hopes of becoming a free state. Egypt has begun to ally themselves with other groups in support of the Palestine statehood. We have in place treaty agreement with Palestine and will continue to honor those agreements as Palestine looks to become independent.

Egypt has begun showing its support not only through the representatives for the two nations discussing details, but also in the actions of our people. The Egyptian people have taken to protest outside the UN’s offices in order to show their support for Palestinian statehood. Egypt has begun to reach out to larger nations in hopes for support. As a member of the UN, we have reached out to the United States in hopes that that States will allow for larger countries to begin backing. The backing of larger countries would provide backing from more countries as they follow the example of leading countries. Our state would support that full economic support be provided to support our stance. It is in our best interest to support Palestine, due to the fact that with Palestine being declared an independent state, that terrorist groups will become scarcer throughout the Middle Eastern Mediterranean border. We would also support that all decisions be reached with the citizens in mind and their needs for food supply due to the war taking place that has destroyed crops and imports. Egypt is hoping to create Palestine states, but without violence that may pursue. The Republic of Egypt acknowledges that the US has Arab ties; we hope to use these ties to allow for US support in backing the Palestine statehood. Egypt is very well aware of the heated arguments that can conquer with debate, but assures the nations that all debate will be kept civilized. While Egypt has strong emotions about Palestine statehood, we hope to come to the conclusion that Palestine should be its own state.

The Republic of Egypt will continue to support Palestine statehood with the support of its citizens as well. It is in our best interest to support Palestine, and we will contribute and help Palestine to receive full support from the United Nations and membership into the UN.

Works Cited:

CNN Staff. "Post-revolution Delegates from Egypt and Libya Address U.N." CNN. CNN.com, 24 Sept. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2012.

Fahmy, Nabil. "Egypt in the World." Egypt in the World. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. ]

Vasovic, Aleksandar. "Egypt Rallies Support for Palestinian Statehood at UN | Common Dreams." Common Dreams. N.p., 6 Sept. 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2012.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: France
Delegate Name: Claire McNorton
School: Royal Oak High School

The State of Palestine is one of the most pressing international issues of our day. It is time for us as nations to come up with a comprehensive plan in order to move Palestine forward. The world cannot afford to see Palestine remain in the state that it is currently in. The conditions present in Palestine will only continue to be a breeding ground for violence and destruction if we as an international community allow things to continue the way they are. With this being said it would also be unwise for us to rush Palestine into statehood. We must consider this issue very carefully. The plan we put forward should set Palestine in the direction of statehood without attempting to move things along too quickly. As we saw in 2000 with the Wye River Conference, it is of our best interest to ensure that all parties feel that Palestine is prepared for statehood.

France and its fellow member states of the European Union (EU) have been attempting to been attempting to assist Palestine for many years now. The EU is Palestine’s greatest financial contributor. As nations we have dedicated $250 million annually from 2000-2005. In 1997 the EU put forth an Interim Association Agreement in the hopes of ensuring cooperation between Palestine and the EU. The EU also put forth an Action Plan for Palestine. The Action Plan was comprehensive and set forth a multi-faceted strategy on to solve the Palestinian issue. The plan was continued for a period of about five years and is currently being improved upon. However, the EU cannot fix Palestine alone. It is necessary that the international community take some of the measures that the EU has taken in order to move Palestine towards statehood.

France and the EU are in complete support of a two-state solution. In order to come up with a solution we must first accept two things; the first being that it is necessary for Palestine to become a full state. The second thing we must accept is that Palestine is not yet ready to become a full state. It is currently unstable on far too many levels. If we wish to see a peaceful world it is imperative that we make sure Palestine succeeds. France would like to focus our time on addressing starting to create mechanisms for political, economic, and legal security in Palestine.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Germany
Delegate Name: John Dood
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

Ever since the formation of the current Israeli government, Germany has seen conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people. In more recent years, the conflict has escalated. Palestinian suicide bombers are a constant source of fear to the general Israeli populous. Israel has unjustly retaliated by bulldozing houses of suicide bombers. The basic human rights of many Palestinians are being challenged by an Israeli government that is simply trying to maintain national sovereignty and security.

The only way to change this status quo in this region is to seek a solution that pleases both sides. The best way to accomplish this is for both sides of the conflict to let go of their reservations and fear and enter good faith negotiations with each other. This cannot happen while both sides continue to accuse each other of war crimes. Therefore, Germany suggests absolving Israel and the Palestinian people of all charges against each other. In order to maintain diplomatic order while the terms of peace are determined, recompense for these crimes must be given from international sources.

After analysis of the governing ability of both Israel and the Palestinian people, Germany recommends that the Palestinian people be given independence and, in turn, international protection from Israel. This cannot happen until Israel recognizes Palestine as an independent nation with sovereignty. Shortly following, the Security Council should grant them full recognition with a voting seat in the United Nations.

Currently in the state of Israel, Palestinian citizens must apply for a permit in order to own land, and the Israeli government does not accept enough of these permits to be able to house the population. This law would be a major contributor to conflict in the region and its continued enforcement will hamper all peace efforts. Therefore, in order to ensure the well being of non-Jewish residents in Israel, it is important that the Special Political Committee requests that the Legal Committee consider the question of property ownership as a human right.

It is important that all member nations set aside their ulterior motives and work together to promote peace between Israel and the Palestinian people. The Federal Republic of Germany is confident that the work done by this committee will lead to a strong Israeli state and a growing, independent Palestinian government.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Guatemala
Delegate Name: Conor Estabrook
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

Guatemala does not believe that Palestine should be recognized by the United Nations as a state. The Palestinian government does not have it’s affairs in order and is borderline untrustworthy. The amount of terrorist groups given voice inside the government and the extremist who are allowed to run free inside the borders show that Palestine is not ready to be recognized as a state. While we believe that Palestine should be allowed to send representatives to the united nations negotiation table but that they should only be able to speak their side of the story not vote on issues such as other recognized nations. Their is a general lack of good faith in Palestine. After failing to meet the preset conditions necessary to start the negotiations with Israel they claim that Israel is the one being unproductive. The reason preset conditions are necessary is because of the untrustworthy nature of the Palestinian government who has failed to stop the multiple extremist groups from breaking cease fires. If Palestine can control or exterminate the extremist groups that run rampant, honor the cease fire agreements between them and Israel, and agree to negotiate with the preset conditions given to them then they can make themselves out to be a legitimate state. When Palestine shows itself to be capable of self government it can go through the process of becoming recognized by the united nations with Guatemala's support. Then considerations of the two state solution can be brought to fruition and Palestine can have an international presence.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Haiti
Delegate Name: Sam Oostendorp
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Conflict between the Israel and Palestinian people has gone on too long. This is a problem that has been around for many years, and as time goes on, it only gets worse. These two states have proved to be threats to one another and not a day goes by without a casualty. Over the past century, the area of Palestinian land has decreased substantially, and the Israeli people have gotten a little too comfortable with their borders. The Israeli government has done little to solve this problem and it is the United Nations responsibility to resolve this issue.

The ideal solution would be to divide the two states, supplying each with adequate and equal land area for their needs. It is important that we choose to create borders for these two states that does not require an excess of relocation, and maintains the necessary cities and landmarks within each country. The Palestinians are in control of the Gaza Strip and West Bank and should remain in the control of Palestine. The largest city, Gaza, should be made the new capital of Palestine. A compromise to connect the west bank and the Gaza strip under Palestinian authority and give Israel full control of Jerusalem may be a practical solution. In short, the south and west portion of Israel should be converted into Palestine, under full control of Palestine, and the north and east portion of Israel, should belong to the Israeli people, under full control of the Israeli government. Jerusalem should be nationally recognized as the capital of Israel. After this solution is carried out, it is up to the two countries to handle their internal affairs, such as type of government, rights of their citizens, etc.

The current situation in Israel is counterproductive and dangerous. The stubbornness of the Israeli government has proven to escalate the situation, and further the two states from a peaceful resolution. In order for a solution to be reached, the two states must come to terms with one another and realize the necessity of this solution. If necessary, the wall that currently exists between the two may be reconstructed to provide both privacy, and security for both countries. Although this option is not suggested, it may be necessary.

Haiti would also like to see the United Nations follow up on this change to ensure the security of both nations. It is important that checkpoints be created on the border to both promote trade, and regulate the incoming and outgoing of both Israeli and Palestinian people between the two countries. The hope is that this division of Israel would result in less conflict between Israeli people and Palestinian people due to the fact that the borders would then on be internationally recognized, and secured. The main reason for conflict currently, is border disputes; with the creation of internationally recognized borders, these disagreements would hopefully subside.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: India
Delegate Name: Daniel Sharp
School: Forest Hills Central High School

We finish what we start. It is not just a moral Indians exclusively enshrine – it is a moral all humans strive to achieve as a sign of success, of prosperity, and of harboring years of peace. The Republic of India has devoted much of its history to this moral – most recently from our long-fought and well-earned independence from Great Britain and our continued negotiations over the Kashmir and Jammu Region. It is easier said than done, yet we have proven not only do, but listen, speak, and act.

That is why the Republic of India calls the United Nation to also finish what we have started. It was us who saw the need for a refuge for the displaced Jewish population in Europe after the Second World War. It was us who oversaw the negotiations between the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Zionist community to create Israel. So when violence rings in the ears of displaced children and concerned countries around the world in the place we have helped begin, we must end the conflict not only for our own sake but also for the sake of the people of Israel and Palestine.

This topic is not grounds for a blame game. Both sides have hurt and have been hurt; India’s heart goes out to both invaluable Israel and Palestine. But in order to decide the question of Palestinian Statehood, we must implore an indefinite cease-fire in a land of near chaos. In our position paper concerning Improving Political Conflict Resolution Mechanisms, India called for a way opposition could petition for UN assistance by establishing peaceful negotiations between the current government and the loyal opposes.

In the case of Israel and Palestine, the Republic of India calls for both sides to offer a petition to the Department of Political Affairs, acknowledging the desire they have for peace, as well as negotiations concerning the current two-state resolution. Representatives from each side should meet in the setting of the United Nations to also finalize unfinished negotiations they have made in the past such as the Taba Summit, as well as consider signing the Arab Peace Initiative or any other proposals presented at this conference.

Whether we choose to allow or deny Palestinian statehood, India’s primary goal is to cease the senseless fighting and come to a resolution. Whether we see a two-state resolution or a Palestinian defeat, the Republic of India is excited to work with the representatives on this possibly historic final chapter in the book more than fifty years in the making. And finish what we started.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Indonesia
Delegate Name: Aaron Bernard
School: Roeper School

I am honored to representing the Republic of Indonesia in UN General Assembly debate to discuss the Palestinian homeland. From the perspective of Indonesia, there is no question on the issue of statehood. The Zionist entity has violated human rights in almost every scenario and to that end; it is the natural right of the Palestinian people to their own self determination.

As with any issue, in order to fully understand it we must first look to past action. The UN has previously tried negotiations but they have only led to the humanitarian crisis which we see today. It is with this past in mind that Indonesia advocates for a different future; with greater emphasis on nation building. The UN has seen its greatest successes in response to humanitarian crisis to that end; we see the UN future role in this crisis as a nation builder.

Indonesia also advocates that individual nations support the plight of our Palestinian brothers. As a staunch supporter of Palestine, Indonesia has often expressed its commitment to helping prepare the establishment of Palestine’s state by providing capacity building programs for Palestinians. In July 2008, Indonesia hosted a New Asian African Strategic Partnership (NAASP) Ministerial Conference on Capacity Building for Palestine. Participants of the meeting agreed to provide training programs for 10,000 Palestinians within a five-year period, from 2008 to 2013.

The solution we offer was most elegantly stated by his Excellency Foreign Affairs Minister Marty Natalegawa during the 16th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) held in Tehran, Iran, last August: "The cause of our brothers and sisters in Palestine is the cause of the NAM. It is also Indonesia’s cause. We must, therefore, take concrete and vigorous steps to ensure that Palestine’s bid for enhanced status in the United Nations succeeds this year. We must also see to it that the establishment of a Palestine state in 2013, as envisioned by Palestinian leaders, is realized.”

We the Republic of Indonesia pray that one day our Palestinian brothers will be free.

Peace be upon us all

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Iran
Delegate Name: Patrick Awtrey
School: Forest Hills Central High School

The question of Palestinian statehood originated during the late 1940s. Britain had recently partitioned several portions of the Middle Eastern territories, leaving only a small area which now consists of the Zionist regime (or Israel, according to westernized nations) and Palestine. In 1947, the United Nations adopted a two-state plan that would have divided the territory into two nations, one for the Jewish community and one for the Arab. The Jewish leaders quickly declared the State of Israel according to this plan. Rather than declare their own state, the Arab leaders declared war on Israel. This Arab-Israeli War resulted in an armistice that granted even more territory to Israel than was originally declared. Two decades later, during the Six-Day War in 1967, the State of Israel expanded its territory even further by taking control of the Gaza Strip from Egypt, West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. In 1974, the United Nations passed Resolution 3236 which recognized the right of the Palestinian people to “self-determination, national independence, and sovereignty”. The Palestine Liberation Organization was then established as the sole representative of the Palestinian territories and has since been granted observer status within the United Nations. In 1988, the PLO declared the establishment of the independent State of Palestine and has been given restricted authority by Israel over their claimed territories.

Following the revolution which established the Islamic Republic of Iran, we officially transferred the Israeli embassy to the PLO. Following this event, our relations with Palestine broke down due to their acknowledgement of the the Zionist regime. We have since restored ties, and we currently serve as the primary source of funding to Hamas. Despite our diplomatic intentions, we also believe that Hamas ought to be considered as the true representative of the people of Palestine.

Currently, one of Israel’s main concerns is safety. They are reluctant to give the Palestinians the attributes of an independent state, because they could potentially become a dangerous enemy with the capabilities of inflicting harm. Israel would, at least, seek to retain limited control over the Palestinian territories. The Palestinians, on the other hand, have already compromised by accepting a possible state which would encompass only West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as its capital . The Palestinians are also very frustrated with Israel’s influence in their territories; although Israel has withdrawn from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, they are continually active in the Abbas-controlled West Bank. This digresses into Israel's decision to continue the establishment of settlements in areas which were recently confiscated illegally, despite condemnation on behalf of the United States. Amidst all of this quarreling, it is the current position of Israel that Palestinian statehood is the only solution to this ongoing conflict. In fact, Netanyahu has recently indicated that he supports the notion of a demilitarized Palestinian state with reduced territory.

As far as we are concerned, Israel is merely an extension of Palestine under control by the Zionist regime. Israel has no genuine roots in the region they occupy, and for years they have been successful in convincing the western world of their artificial entitlement to Palestine. Negotiations have proceeded for far too long, and it is time to bring an end to them. It is Iran’s goal within our committee to propose a solution which would grant as much territory to the Palestinian authorities as possible (it is our ultimate goal to potentially dismantle of the State of Israel all together). At this point, we believe that establishing a Palestinian state according to the Arab-Israeli war armistice boundaries, with East Jerusalem as its capital, is an appropriate starting point. This would then set up the possibility of presenting the State of Palestine for admission within the United Nations as either a member state, or as a non-member observer state through bypass of the Security Council. Doing either would grant Palestine the ability to negotiate with Israel via international courts. We believe this is achievable given that 70 percent of the world’s nations have recognized Palestine already. However, Israel has rejected this proposal, and while they concede to the formation of a Palestinian State, they are unwilling to establish one according to pre-1967 borders.

As far as our agenda is concerned, Israel is our biggest potential impediment. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been successful in removing this issue from the international table of discussion amidst other topics which are more “relevant”. Recently in the United Nations, Israel has not been committed to resolving this issue, let alone have they been accountable outside of this organization. Our support for Hamas, which Israel has labeled a “terrorist group”, combined with their strong opposition to our nuclear program, indicates that they will likely do all which is in their power to prevent our delegation from resolving this dilemma. This only highlights their corrupted ways, as it should be in the Zionists’ own best interest to strive for a two-state solution. Their proclamation that this issue is in fact not a cause of our region’s volatility is also a disgrace on their part, and an indication of their ignorance. An ally of Israel, the United States has also indicated support for a Palestinian, despite their belief that official recognition and establishment ought to be made outside of the United Nations.

We are confident that we will have the support of all nations who wish to grant Palestine its much deserved independence. While Palestinian authorities have indicated their disapproval of Iran outside the realm of this issue, their desire for statehood presents a common ground that all Arabic countries, including those which are non-Arabic, can stand upon. Countries which have endorsed and will push for Palestinian statehood include China and Russia, both of which are permanent members to the Security Council. Both of these countries also support Hamas as well, which indicates to my country that there is strong potential to make progress on this issue together.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Israel
Delegate Name: Cameron Shabahang
School: Forest Hills Eastern High School

The State of Israel adamantly maintains that the genuine path to peace between the Arab and the Israeli peoples is dependent upon bilateral negotiations with mutual concessions between the government of the State of Israel and the Palestinian National Authority, which in accordance with the 1993 Oslo Accords legally exercises administrative authority over the Israeli territories of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The State of Israel regrets the Palestinian National Authority’s inability to enforce complete adherence to the 1993 Oslo Peace Accords, due to the occupation of the Gaza Strip by the terrorist organization Hamas in 2007, and states its intention to continue to defend its legal borders and national sovereignty by any means necessary. In 2011, the United States appropriately vetoed the Palestinian Authority’s misguided unilateral attempt to seize statehood at the United Nations in contravention of the 1993 Oslo Peace Accords and in flagrant disregard of negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and the State of Israel. According to President Barack Obama of the United States, “Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the U.N.” The government of Israel is committed to bilateral negotiations without preconditions. According to Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, Israel wishes to “begin peace negotiations immediately without prior conditions.” Israel is committed to democracy and self-determination for all peoples. However, as stated by Netanyahu, “the fundamental condition for ending the conflict is the public, binding and sincere Palestinian recognition of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish People.” Israel is not opposed to the concept of a Palestinian state. “We are ready to agree to a real peace agreement, a demilitarized Palestinian state side by side with the Jewish state,” said Netanyahu. Yet any territorial agreement must respect Israel’s territorial integrity with Jerusalem as the capital of a secure Israel. If only our neighbors work for peace, we can achieve peace.

The State of Israel strongly denounces, however, recent attempts by the Palestinian Authority to evade negotiations and futilely take unilateral steps to gain recognition as an independent state at the United Nations General Assembly. The community of nations cannot recognize a state at war. Terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and terrorist states such as the Islamic Republic of Iran, cannot be allowed to use an independent Palestine as a weapon against Israel’s national security and the freedom of the Jewish people. By bypassing talks, the Palestinian Authority is in abrogation of the Oslo Peace Accords and other previous peace agreements. Israel cannot recognize Palestine as a non-member observer state based on pre-1967 boundaries, which would breach the national security of Israel and unilaterally divest Israel of its sovereign land in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. Israel views a unilateral bid for Palestinian statehood at the General Assembly as a red line, which requires the harshest Israeli response. Such an action is in flagrant contravention of the Oslo Peace Accords, and would result in unilateral action by the State of Israel to preserve its interests by fully or partially cancelling the Oslo Peace Accords after review. According to Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, “even though this would not be a simple step to take because Israel would have to pay the consequences, toppling Abu Mazen's [PA President Mahmoud Abbas] regime is the only option in such a case.” Israel is committed to bilateral negotiations for Palestinian statehood, but cannot compromise its national security and the rights, liberties, and freedoms of the Jewish people.

The State of Israel commends the moral majority of the Western world for supporting a lasting peace between the Arab and Israeli peoples through bilateral negotiations. Israel is in full agreement that a two-state solution is a viable option if Palestine exists as a demilitarized state that recognizes the sovereignty of the State of Israel, the homeland of the Jewish people. The majority of the European Union, the United States, Australia, Canada, Mexico, and scores of nations from the Pacific to the Caribbean support the position of the State of Israel that Palestinian statehood cannot be achieved through a unilateral United Nations bid that only serves to aggrandize the interests of Israel’s enemies. Israel strongly appreciates the efforts of the United States to discourage the Palestinian Authority and Mahmoud Abbas from unilateral action.

The State of Israel regrets the decision of the Palestinian Authority to attempt to gain statehood through the United Nations General Assembly. The State of Israel urges the Palestinian Authority to respect the wishes of the Palestinian people and to uphold the Oslo Peace Accords, which represented major steps towards a lasting peace between the Arab and Israeli peoples. The State of Israel reminds the Palestinian Authority that it is not in absolute control of the regions over which it was granted administrative control, notably the Gaza Strip, which is now controlled by the terrorist organization Hamas. The State of Israel cannot allow the Islamic Republic of Iran to use an independent Palestine as a proxy to launch attacks on Israel, much like it uses Hezbollah as a proxy today. Recently, on 14 November 2012, Israel’s Iron Dome air system intercepted 13 missile strikes from the Gaza Strip, which is nominally controlled by the Palestinian Authority, although it is now in the hands of Hamas terrorists. If the Palestinian people cannot coexist with Israel in a peaceful manner and join with the Jewish people to promote peace and prosperity, they are not yet ready for an independent nation. Only through peace can Palestine exist independently.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Italy
Delegate Name: Emily Dean
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

Palestine is a very important and very big topic being discussed in the United Nations. Most of the discussion is revolving around the fact that Palestine is attempting to become its own state. Palestine has been part of the United Nations since 1974, but does not yet have a full seat. It has been labeled as a “permanent observer”. The Palestinian people are represented by the PLO, or the Palestine Liberation Organization. Up until 1993, the PLO was considered to be a terrorist group. At the Madrid Conference in 1993, the PLO rejected violence and terrorism, recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace, and accepted United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338. In response to this, Israel officially recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people.

The country of Italy, along with Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland, has upgraded the Palestinian delegation in their country to a full diplomatic mission. We believe that Palestine should be granted statehood, because of the progress that has been made there. They have an official representation and they have a permanent observer seat on the United Nations.

Palestine has been fighting to become a state for years. It would give them a better sense of national sovereignty, because as a state they will be able to expand their government, create better, more structured laws for themselves, and act as a state would. Palestine and its people would feel more independent as their own state, because they will no longer be a part of Israel. Italy believes that this could also help conflict between Israel and Palestine in the way that borders, Palestinian freedom, security, and water rights will hopefully no longer be an issue. Each one of those issues can be solved with the electing of Palestine as its own state, and will provide safer places to live for both Israeli people and Palestinian people.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Japan
Delegate Name: Fatima Sheikh
School: Fishers High School

Japan is in favor of a two-state solution to urge peaceful co-existence between Palestine, Israel, and help benefit the rest of the region as well. Making Palestine a separate state, Japan believes, would make diminish violence between the ethnic groups and aid prosperity. During an official meeting in Tokyo in 2012, Prime Minister Hatoyama confirmed Japan's position to support President Abbas (of Palestine) and his efforts for a separate state. In aiding Palestinian Authority in its efforts to build a state, Japan has donated nearly 100 million dollars to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). This money was intended to aid education and provide social services for the refuges in Palestinian territory, funding more than 300 schools and providing free education for children up to a certain number of years.

Japan also believes that improving the economy is necessary for a future Palestine State. Both Palestine and Japan are in agreement on this position, that targeting the private sector would help benefit the economy. Also, Japan believes that expanding the effort to cooperate with East Asian countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore would help gain more funding and support. The Corridor for Peace and Prosperity Initiative was designed by Japan to create and carry out projects in the region to promote cooperation, such as building an agro-industrial park near the West Bank to help transport goods. In an effort to mediate and pursue action, Japan is ready to host the first meeting of this Initiative. On a broader scale, Japan wishes to serve as a facilitator between Israelis and Arabs to encourage cooperation and good relations between the region and someday pursue the possibility of an independent Palestinian state, that can easily co-exist with Israel.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Jordan
Delegate Name: Yasmeen Farran
School: Mattawan High School

As tension and battle rages between the nations of Israel and Palestine, there have been many talks of peace and the statehood of Palestine. Currently, Palestine is not recognized as a country and holds no vote in United Nations proceedings. The partition first set in motion in 1947, divided the country equally. Although the equal division met opposition, today, the level of equality has greatly fallen victim upon the Arabs. However, Israel met little welcome in their move to the United Nations’ promised land. The great tension between the two countries has resulted in animosity creating bloodshed from both sides.

Jordan recognizes the validity of both countries. Jordan thanks Israel for its generous foreign aid. However, Jordan reaches a sympathetic hand to its Muslim brethren in Palestine. Both sides have added to the disagreement; however, both countries have expressed a want to end the fighting and move closer to a time of peace. This makes the time of agreement critical.

Moving forward, Jordan would like to see a fair agreement made between the two nations that better reflects the divisions outlined in the original partition. After years of residence by both nations, it can be concluded that both consider the area their home. This makes it nearly impossible to give the country to a single nation. An agreement must be made despite resentment and cultural clashes. Amnesty on certain issues must be given.

Jordan has shown in the past, our desire to be a helping hand in these agreements and extend our hands once more in hopes that a lasting agreement may be made.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Lesotho
Delegate Name: Lauren Higgins
School: Kalamazoo Central High School

The Kingdom of Lesotho believes that the issue of Palestine Statehood needs to be resolved. This issue can be traced back to roots in the late 19th century and starting in the 1940’s it escalated and became violent. It has gone on far too long; it is time for the United Nations to resolve this conflict.

Restoration of peace throughout the world should be a priority for the United Nations. Israel and Palestine have been large contributors to global conflict for decades. This conflict has been allowed to escalate far beyond control. Both Israel and Palestine want to end this conflict as peacefully as possible but both have different outcomes in mind. Resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be top priority of the United Nations.

The Kingdom of Lesotho is in favor of Palestine being recognized as a state by the United Nations. Lesotho has faced struggles similar to what Palestine is confronting with Israel. There is a parallel that can be seen between Lesotho and Palestine. Palestine’s struggle with Israel has been mostly been of a religious nature but the question of their statehood has to do with territorial issues. Lesotho has faced territorial issues involving South Africa. The South African government has many times tried to lay claim to the land that makes up the country of Lesotho, therefore imposing on their statehood. Much like Palestine the Kingdom of Lesotho has struggled to be recognized as a state. In support of a country that struggles with similar issues Lesotho is in favor of Palestinian Statehood.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Madagascar
Delegate Name: Alexander Raveane
School: Roeper School

The Republic of Madagascar believes that a two-state solution will be required to settle the issue of Palestinian statehood. Palestinians and their allies are in favor of a two state solution, while Israel and their allies oppose it. The United Nations has made Palestine a “Permanent Overseer” but not a full member despite Palestine’s complaints. There is significant opposition to a Palestinian state in the United States and the European Union, but Russia, China and the Organization of African Unity are mostly in favor of one.

Israel is rightfully worried about its security but Madagascar believes that a Palestinian state has a right to exist. This is mainly because of all of the Palestinian refugees who have no homes to go to and deplete the resources of the countries that they currently live in. Palestine, however, should be willing to negotiate, not try to seek independence immediately and not try to regain all of their previous territories. Also Palestinians and Israelis would have to agree not to militarize their borders, as to address both states security issues. One possible solution to all of this is to give Palestine part of or all of the west bank. Also, Israel and The Palestine should consider starting trade with each other to break some of the old physiological barriers. Madagascar has no opinions on the matter of Jerusalem, besides the fact that we think a fair solution should be agreed upon by Israel and a new Palestinian state. The political characteristics of the Palestinian state would also be up to the Palestinians to determine, as long as the government was humane to society.

Madagascar has a History of nonalignment in global issues. We have, however, broken ties with apartheid South Africa and Israel before, concerning similar issues. We are also part of the International Organization for Migration (IOM), in which one of the main goals is to encourage humane migration and discourage forced migration. Our many allies in Europe have mixed beliefs on the issue of Palestine, but our trading partners in Asia and Africa are mostly in favor of a Palestinian state.

Because The Republic of Madagascar itself was a colony pre-1960, we have supported many independence movements. In the past, we have supported the independence movements in the Western Sahara, and now we will support a two state solution for Israel and Palestine. Even though Madagascar feels strongly about this issue, we will not stop trading with Israel or their allies, if a two state solution is not met. Madagascar restored relations with both Israel and South Africa in 1993 to create trade agreements, and we have promoted diverse economic ties throughout the world ever since the cold war ended.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Mexico
Delegate Name: Gregory Poole
School: Forest Hills Northern High School

The question of Palestinian statehood has been debated for the past four decades. All solutions proposed thus far have been denied. The escalating violence in the region has brought this topic back to international discussion, bringing with it all the atrocities and grievances on both sides. Both sides have ideas and opinions on what to compromise on, but these nations must reach agreements to resolve this violent debate peacefully, and the United Nations must help resolve this debate not only for the good of the countries involved, but also for the good of the people involved.

The United Mexican States has always supported the formation of a free Palestinian state, and voted for the original, 1967 partition plan creating two equal states in the region of Israel. However, events have since destroyed the state of Palestine, reverting it to Israeli control. This angered the Palestinians, and led to violence stretching four decades. Recent peace talks have led to several solutions to the question of Palestinian statehood. The two main solutions are to either divide the nation of Israel along the original partition plan lines of 1967, or, as the nation of Israel has suggested, divide the nation of Israel into two unequal parts, the largest of which shall go to Israel and the smaller to the Palestinians. As mentioned before, the nation of Mexico has always concluded that a fair and equal partition of the region of Palestine and Israel is the solution most likely to keep the peace and promote friendship and trust in the region of the Middle East. A plan of this description would involve finding a boundary that would lead to an equal split, and the movement of Israelis and Palestinians into their respective territories. While a partition like this would lead to much work, it is Mexico’s thinking that it is necessary to divide this region equally, to avoid unwanted anger and bloodshed. While both factions involved wish to avoid further violence, they have differing views on how this is to be accomplished. The nation of Mexico has always valued fairness and equity, and so finds this the solution maybe not a solution that will please everyone, but certainly it won’t overly displease everyone, and it will do so to the same degree for everyone. However, this plan could potentially lead to a few hard feelings in the nation of Israel and the new state of Palestine, potentially leading to increased violence. Therefore, Mexico surmises that United Nations observers should be sent to make sure these hard feelings do not lead to violence.

The question of Palestinian statehood stretches back to 1967, when the United Nations voted to partition the region of Palestine, a decision that led to countless wars, refugees, and many bombs of varying types and sizes going off throughout the region every week. This situation, stretching for almost half a century, needs to be resolved in a fashion that is fair and just. The member nations of the United Nations must come to an agreement, an agreement that is peaceful, and an agreement that takes into account the atrocities committed and grievances suffered on both sides of this debate.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Morocco
Delegate Name: Doug Weathers
School: Mattawan High School

Constant struggle has plagued Israel and Palestine for many decades. Thousands of lives have been uprooted because of constant struggle for land. These are just a few of the many struggles that need to be addressed by only the people of Israel and Palestine. The Kingdom of Morocco strongly feels that Israel and Palestine both possess the resources needed to solve their own issues. There are multiple success stories throughout history of groups of people solving issues without outside influence. Israel and Palestine are another example of two groups of people that can be added to this list if they are given the chance.

The Kingdom of Morocco would like to remain neutral surrounding this controversial issue because of our affiliation with other organizations and nations. We have strong economic ties with both the United States of America and European nations, because of this, Morocco would not like to offend any of these nations through our interest in Palestinian statehood. Morocco requires both the United States of America and European markets to maintain a health economy. We would not like to upset these economic ties. Also, Morocco is a member of the League of Arab States and would not like to offend any of the other members. We intend to not offend any of the nations that are members of the League of Arab States by not becoming involved in the controversy that surrounds the question of Palestinian statehood. By staying neutral on this issue, Morocco hopes that we can maintain our positive relationships with the League of Arab States, United States of America, and Europe.

All in all, the Kingdom of Morocco would like to possess a neutral stance on the question of Palestinian statehood in hopes that we can maintain our relationship with our surrounding Arab nations and our relationship with the United States and European nations. These relationships are very important in order for Morocco to remain a healthy nation. Morocco is excited to be able to discuss viable options with other nations about this extremely volatile issue.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Netherlands
Delegate Name: Tristan Robb
School: Saginaw Arts and Sciences Academy

The Netherlands recognizes the struggles of Pakistan, and the huge Arab-Israeli problems that arise from it. Since the creation of Israel in 1948, there have been many conflicts and attacks between Pakistan and Israel, from simple protests to full fledged wars and terrorist attacks. The fact that conflict between Israel and Pakistan still exists, and that there still are extremists on either side that still demand bloodshed, greatly troubles us. However, making Palestine its own state is not a viable option. Instead, Palestine and Israel must create stable relations through diplomacy and acceptance. Until Palestine and Israel fully open diplomacy and settle old disputes, the Netherlands will not accept a two-state solution to Palestine becoming a state.

The Netherlands sees Palestine’s demands of statehood rash and unreasonable, and feels it necessary to staunchly oppose this approach. If countries demand statehood without considering other options of gaining recognition, then they will see that the UN’s core focus, communication, is but an illusion, where only those who shout the loudest for the longest get the way they want. The United Nations must go through the same process for Palestine as with any other country.

Though the Netherlands does not agree with Israel’s demanding of preconditions before communication, we will stand by their trusted ally in dealing with such a dangerous topic. Hopefully, through understanding and diplomacy between each other, Palestine and Israel can find a solution that both parties can agree on, and only then will the we recognize Palestine as a state.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Nigeria
Delegate Name: Casey Bechtel
School: Mattawan High School

Palestine and Israel are known to be threats to each other. To end this, Palestine needs to become its own state. Nigeria makes a stand on the way to resolve conflicts through peaceful negotiations. Therefore, Nigeria believes that both Palestine and Israel need to live peacefully side-by-side. Nigeria has recognized the statehood of Palestine since, 1984, and will continue to do so. The two-state solution is in the best interest of both groups.

Nigeria has kept good ties with both Palestine and Israel. Even with the good relations with Israel, Nigeria still feels it is best for there to become two permanent states. However, the USA plans on vetoing Palestine’s request. Nigeria wants all countries that in order fort there to be peace among the Middle East both states need its representation. In order for this peace to be accomplished, both sides need to be pleased.

Independent Palestinian government is the ultimate solution. Many of the surrounding Middle Eastern nations have felt the distress from the Palestinian people. This pleases the Palestinian people while it will end the ever-constant threat to Israel. No longer, would they need to worry about rebels infiltrating its country. The only issue remaining is the retaliation from Israel onto Palestine. The United Nations should give protection to Palestine from Israel to end the conflict and promote peace. It is now the time for The United Nations to spread equality among nations and grant Palestine its statehood. This will be the first step in acquiring peace and stability in the Middle East.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: North Korea
Delegate Name: Matthew Suandi
School: Williamston High School

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is all too aware of the struggles that the Palestinian people face today. Similar to Palestine, the DPRK has also been attacked and occupied by imperialist warmongers and their satellite states. However, while we have overcome our adversaries to achieve our right of self determination, the Palestinians have not been so successful. As a result of an imperialist and Zionist cabal of which a key sponsor is the United States of America, the Zionist entity has succeeded in divesting, murdering, and oppressing Palestinians. The DPRK deplores the atrocious attitudes of Western governments which are preventing the resolution of this crisis. We recognize that there is but one fair solution to this seemingly never ending injustice and that is to establish one state in Palestine that guarantees a right of return for all of its former citizens.

For its part, the DPRK has recognized the State of Palestine since the 1988 Algiers declaration. We have stood in solidarity with the opponents of the illegal Zionist regime for decades, and we condemn the continued support that the United States provides to its imperialist satellite state. We seriously question how any nation that regards itself sane and moral can distance itself from the Palestinian cause. We ask the United States and her satellite states how they can turn their back on six decades of prejudice and discrimination. Having experienced the perils of such circumstances, we stand together with the Palestinians. For the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea could never condone America and her Zionist Regime’s continuing tyrannical subjugation of the Palestinians.

The DPRK calls upon all nations to recognize that there is one indivisible nation between the Jordan and the Mediterranean, and that is the State of Palestine. We implore the members of this international body to ensure that all Palestinian refugees are granted with a right of return to their homeland of which they were robbed, and toward this end provide aid for their well-being. We also demand that the Western Imperialists cease their unconditional support of the present cruel and repressive entity which exists in the Levant and immediately recognize the legitimate government of that region. Although the DPRK would like to see unity from all nations on this incredibly important issue, we especially call for support from our non-aligned brothers to ensure justice for Palestine.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Norway
Delegate Name: Liam McCollum
School: Mattawan High School

Norway recognizes that in the country of Israel there has been a huge struggle for Palestinian statehood between the Palestinians and the Israelis. Last year, the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Assistance to the Palestinians resolved that the Palestinian Authority is above the requirements for statehood. In the observations of Norway, the two sides have not made significant progress in any negotiations, instead simply allowing tensions to build between the two sides.

Norway feels that progress in the commencement of these negotiations must be a priority, or the radicals of both sides will lose patience and peace with each other. Norway has and will support the Palestinian efforts toward statehood. Norway feels that Israel officials must agree to meet with Palestinian officials in order to formulate a two-state country. Palestinians face economic trouble as a nation, due to the potential risk of economic crisis striking them upon statehood. In addition to overcoming this obstacle, Norway also expects the Palestinians to reconcile with Israel for the wrongs it has perpetrated, for it feels that this is the only way to foster lasting peace between the two states.

Norway expects the UN's role in these negotiations to be to encourage these two sides to meet and discuss their differences, and to ensure that the two sides recognize each other as viable states in a codependent two-state system. Norway feels that the UN should consider these negotiations of very high importance due to the serious risk that these two parties pose to international peace.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Pakistan
Delegate Name: Farid al-Sabeh
School: Roeper School

While our era becomes increasingly muddled with the politics of hegemony, unrest, and special interest, so too is the power of deliberation becoming increasingly important. It is evident that negotiation is the only outlet to peace and security within a region. When looking to the scope of governments, negotiation exists through the cultivation and comparison of foreign policy: which, by definition, is the interest one state has to another. In the case of Palestine, its international recognition into statehood is especially important.

For these reasons, Pakistan wholly supports the proposal of the creation of an independent Palestinian state. For too long have the interest of the Palestinian people, burdened with constant occupation and bullying by the hands of Israel, been misrepresented. It is only through the creation of a Palestinian state that the needs of Palestine’s people can be fully realized and acted upon. While they do not, breaches in international treaties and even human rights violation can occur without check. This has been the case with the illegal Israeli occupation of the West Bank. Because of this, it is in the international community’s best interest – and even obligation — to embrace the achievements of Palestinian statehood, as doing so will alleviate human rights issues.

Palestine has shown that it is ready for statehood. It is displaying rapid economic growth, and its public deficit has fallen to 19% from 26% in 2007. Furthermore, its reliance on foreign aid has halved during those few years. Remarks made by Israel that Palestinians are generally corrupt or incompetent are certainly invalid. In fact, it seems that the only major issues facing Palestine today are those of international disputes and security: both of which are solved from the top-down, i.e. by a government. Once again it appears imperative that a Palestinian state is created, not only for the Palestinian people, but for stability in the region as a whole.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Palestine
Delegate Name: Robert Mercier
School: Flint Southwestern Classical Academy

Based on our name, I believe that it is obvious where we stand on this topic, and we fail to see why anyone could possibly see it any other way. We were forced off of our land, moved into camps, were abused, mistreated, and not even recognized as a nation, all by a nation who has no real claim on the land. We were here first; they left and gave up their territory. Just because the Israelites have been mistreated in the past, does not mean that they can do the same to us, now that they are sponsored by the western tyrants who believe that they have the authority to push us around.

The way that our people are being treated is completely inappropriate, and the conditions that our people are tolerating are completely sub-par. The fact that the United Nations has waited this long to address what has been robbed from us is thoroughly dissatisfactory, and we will not be quiet in saying that we believe that we need to be refunded our land (not to mentions the lives, possessions, and numerous other things that we have been robbed of).

We, as a people, fail to see where the question comes in this topic. We believe that it should be fairly obvious that we deserve, at the very least, statehood. After being abused, robbed, and mistreated in countless other ways, we are still put down, and put into question. We find this completely and utterly shameful and disrespectful.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Philippines
Delegate Name: Sreten Franovic
School: Forest Hills Central High School

Proposals for a Palestinian state currently refers to the proposed establishment of an independent state for the Palestinian people in Palestine on land that was occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War of 1967 and earlier to that year for 18 years (1949) by Egypt (Gaza) and by Jordan (West Bank). The proposals include the Gaza Strip, which is currently controlled by the Hamas faction of the Palestinian National Authority, the West Bank, which is administered by the Fatah faction of the Palestinian National Authority, and East Jerusalem which is controlled by Israel under a claim of sovereignty. The proclaimed State of Palestine is currently recognized by 131 countries. The Israeli military commander exercises usufructuary rights in accordance with international law, but he is not the legal sovereign of the disputed territory. The permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people over the natural resources of the Palestinian territories has been recognized by 139 countries. Under agreements reached with Israel, the Palestinian Authority exercises de jure control over many natural resources, while interim cooperation arrangements are in place for others.

The Philippines has recognized Palestine as a state since 1989. The Philippines believes they need to be a separate state in order to help to cease the violence and restore any peace that might be available. The Philippines believes that there is no reason to not consider them as a state, seeing as that they are more developed then many countries that are currently recognized as developed.

The Philippines would like to see more UN action on the issue. There should be another vote held on the topic, or at least some sort of resolution passed. The Philippines are not divulging much time or energy on the topic, but are clear on their point that Palestine should be considered as a state, and have a seat in the United Nations.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Portugal
Delegate Name: Ryan Kerr
School: Forest Hills Eastern High School

Tensions between Palestine and Israel continue and the extended turmoil between two lands has become a plight in our world. As a global community, we need a resolution of this conflict, we need to stop the building death tolls, we need lasting peace; however, granting Palestine statehood will not meet these needs. For a time, there may be the semblance of serenity, but this so-called solution promises no stabilization. In support of the two-state solution with pre-1967 borders, Palestine claims that recognizing them as nation gives them equal footing in negotiations and that peace talks will be easier once an independent state. Where is the proof? Once made a nation, the new Palestinian government will be forced to deal with major problems such as refugees, water scarcity, and border violence. While dealing with these problems, will it be easier to make peace with Israel? As Palestine would celebrate their recognition, Israel would be dealing with the unilateral decision that shrinks their borders and cuts in half their capital.

While Portugal believes in a nation of Palestine, the United Nations needs first to ensure that it peacefully establishes a lasting and stable state. What are needed are immediate negotiations. As a body, we must foster peace discussions. Before accepting Palestine as a state, there must be clear solutions to stability problems in Palestine and security problems between the states. The United Nations should require demonstrated progress on these issues. Presently, let us instead promote Palestinian upgrade to a non-member observer. This will recognize immediately the organization and authority of Palestine and allow them a greater voice in the United Nations and international affairs. Prior to the establishment of the independent state of Palestine:

1) Peaceful relations with Israel need to be established

2) Provisions for the millions of Palestinian refugees need to be made

3) Water allocation agreement must be reached

4) Borders must be secured and safe (all violence on both sides needs to be condemned and addressed)

Once these conditions are satisfied, a viable and stable state can form. This also fosters compromise between the two states that must coexist moving forward or forever create aggression in the region.

Portugal remains dedicated to the formation of a peaceful and long-lasting Palestine. To do this, however, Palestine must be prepared. Statehood for the sake of statehood will cause problems, not solve them. Unconditionally, Portugal supports the upgrade of Palestine to a non-member observer. The United Nations should keep in mind long-term needs not simply Palestine’s wants.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Russia
Delegate Name: Wilson Wolf
School: Fishers High School

Russia is in support the Arab League including its Secretary General Nabil Elaraby,

and the plans to let Palestine to become a state.

Russia is in support because in order for the violence to stop Palestine must be let in to the UN so a solution can be formed. Then once a solution is formed for now the UN can look ahead to Syria future. Hopefully the solution for now and the future is national sovereignty.

Despite the fact that Israel has rejected the Arab Leagues first draft Russia is confident that the Arab League will come up with a draft that Israel and the UN will agree to. Russia would also like to point out that Russia will support any kind of bid that Palestine will send to the United Nations.

Russia would also like to say that there needs to be an immediate stop to the violence so that negotiations can start. There also needs to be, in Russia’s opinion a timetable for a new constitution and to prepare for general elections in Syria. Russia has also sent an official message to President Assad emboldening him to start a dialogue and continue with reforms.

There was a meeting with President Assad and the Palestinians antinomy. Unfortunately these talks only resulted in the response that these ideas were only a set of positive ideas as opposed to real life solutions.

So in conclusion Russia fully supports the Arab League and Nabil Elaraby on the topic of Palestinian Statehood. There must be an immediate stop of violence so that talks may start. There needs to be a timetable for a new constitution and for preparations in respect to Syria’s general election. Once these talks start Russia is sure that the UN will accept Palestine as a state. Also, Russia will always be in full support of the decisions made by Palestine whether that be the bid sent to the Security Counsel or the General Assembly. Russia also thinks that the ideas conceived at the meeting with President Assad will with some help eventually become reality. Despite all of the conflicts stated above, there is no doubt in Russia’s or our ally’s minds that Palestine will eventually become a state in the United Nations.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Rwanda
Delegate Name: Matthew Schomisch
School: Kalamazoo Central High School

One of the defining issues of our time is the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Peace must be attained between Israel and Palestine. Rwanda recognizes both Israel and Palestine and wishes to achieve a common ground between the two. The Rwandan people believe that before Palestine is accepted into the global community, more information should be attained. Rwanda is interested in seeing an independent Palestine, but we are hesitant, until proper negotiations can be worked out and assurances that no extremist groups will benefit in the process. Rwanda sees Israeli politics as a major obstacle in the way of Palestinian statehood. Rwanda believes that the people of Palestine should be able to seek independence, if they do so peacefully and in accordance with the United Nations. Rwanda has abstained from voting in favor of recognizing Palestine in the past because we want to see if alternative routes can be taken to reach the goal in conference with Israel. Rwanda affirms that o peace shall be found in the region if Palestine does not seek statehood through compromise with Israel and the west. Rwanda is in favor of Palestine becoming a non-member observer state in the United Nations in order to begin a process of negotiations and peace. Rwanda will always stand for peace and the prosperity of any nation or group of people that wishes to be free and independent. The Rwandan people appreciate your interest in our opinion on this matter.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: South Africa
Delegate Name: Maximilian Mihaylov
School: Ann Arbor Community High School

On September 23 2011 President Mahmoud Abbas submitted an application for Palestine’s full membership of the United Nations. There universal excitement and support that accompanied this event is an indication of how important the issue of Palestinian statehood is, not just for the Palestinians, but in fact for the rest of the world.

In this connection, South Africa believes that the issue of Palestine’s UN membership should be resolved expeditiously.

Above all South Africa believes that we cannot make Palestine’s membership to the UN conditional upon a peace agreement.

South Africa show three points in regard to Palestinian Statehood: that Palestine is a state; that Palestine is a peace-loving state; and that Palestine is willing and able to carry out its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations.

Mindful of the political sensitivities in this process, we believe that it is more important that we act in a manner that befits the stature of this Council and recommend Palestine’s full membership to the United Nations. In addition, the Council should further fulfill its obligations under the Charter and continue negotiation process with the aim of achieving a two state solution.

While the proposal for negotiations is welcome and in fact long overdue, we should recall that we have had concrete timeframes for these negotiations before.

South Africa looks forward, sooner than later, to welcoming Palestine as the 194th member of the United Nations. We also hope the process will, achieve its stated objectives and ultimately bring lasting peace between Israel and Palestine.

We also look forward to meaningful progress that will bring us nearer to the comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East. In this connection, South Africa will continue to contribute in any way that could lead to the resolution of the Middle East problem in all its aspects.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: South Korea
Delegate Name: McKenna Kluemper
School: Fishers High School

The Republic of Korea believes that the issue of Palestinian Statehood has already been adequately discussed, and any further tine spent on the issues, would result in the unnecessary reopening of old topic, while forcing the Special Political committee to recapitulate old suggestions. The topic of Palestinian Statehood has shown itself to be quite unproductive when focused on the major problem: that of the current relations between Palestine and Israel. Palestine becoming a State would cause needless waves in an already tense situation, while doing very little to benefit the people who currently live in Palestine. The United Nations exist to protect the right of each country, and more specifically the right of the people within each country to safety. The Statehood of Palestine would not be enforcing the safety of the people. It would actually endanger the lives of innocent civilians. Based on previous discussions within the United Nations, the majority of members, including the Republic of Korea, agree that the addition of Palestine would be acceptable at this time.

The Republic of Korea believes that the peaceful relations between Palestine and Israel is more important than the title of Statehood, because while important, such a title will not change the violent behavior that would ensue between Israelites and Palestinians if such a title was given, before peaceful treaties were formed and abided by. The possibly for violence and preventable damage to both societies is what the focus of the United Nations should be on. Palestine seeks to officiate the borders from 1967. However, with borders as undefined within the countries themselves, the distinction between what the people determine to be Israel and Palestine is why the violence could occur first. It is also important to understand that the relation between Israel and Palestine, while unstable, is currently economically inclined. As such, stopping tax revenues could potentially hurt both Palestine and Israel. Therefore, the best course of action would be to encourage more communication between the government of Israel and Palestine. Perhaps the as the special political Committee could include in a resolution, the requirement of peace treaties before the issue of Palestinian Statehood could be reopened and further explored. This would help prevent the possibly of hostility.

The Republic of Korea would like to suggest that, until peaceful resolutions are found for the conflict between Israel and Palestine, any movements to advance the position of Palestine in the eyes of the United Nation, be postponed. Recently, Palestine has attempted to become a full member of the United Nations, this failed however and Palestine is now pushing to be considered a non-member. This is an example of the advancements that could be postponed until peaceful negotiation is reached and resolutions to the incorporative agreements have been made. This would focus attention on ending violence and unpredictable feuds. This would also ensure that the people of both Palestine and Israel are taken care of and looked over by governments pushing for titles. It is the duty of the United Nations to see to the safety of the people when resolving issues that deal with disagreeing countries. And the Statehood of Palestine would not be the best resolution for the people of Palestine.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Spain
Delegate Name: Joe Murphy
School: Vicksburg High School

The main problem stems from back in the 1940’s after World War 2 when many European Jews were relocated to Palestine and given there own area called Israel. This angered local Arab groups in the Middle East. So the issue of whether, after the violence of a few wars, Palestine should be a state came into question in the U.N. The main obstacles are that both Jews and Arabs claim the area as a holy land and are unwilling to give it up. Spain believes that Palestine should be given full statehood with the right to govern itself as the area was theirs to begin with.

The idea of whether the Palestinian Authority’s unilateral approach to securing international recognition as a state is a good idea. It will most likely fail due to the fact that the United States has declared that it will use its Security Council veto against the Palestinian Authority’s bold move to gain statehood, but will progress towards being a state. The Palestinian Authority will

certainly ask the U.N. to be considerd an oberver state and that will most likley pass the general assembly. Though it may be harmfull to the peace by trying to declare statehood as it requires both sides to agree to accomplish anything. In taking steps to declare statehood it could be seen as abold move that could disrupt the fragile peace.

Isreal wishes to expand and keep its settlements in what would become Palestine. The fact that Isreal will negotiate without precondtions is helpful in trying to speed things along but not in starting negotiations with the Palestians. They wish for their precondtions to be met before starting negotiations with Isreal.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Switzerland
Delegate Name: Giancarlo Fiorenzo
School: Forest Hills Central High School

The question of Palestinian statehood is a hotly debated topic throughout the world, most specifically in the Middle East. It has been proposed that the Palestinian people have their own independent state. 131 countries formally recognize this state. However, this proposed state includes land currently owned by Israel. Israel and its supporters, namely the United States, oppose an official Palestine state.

Switzerland does not recognize Palestine as a state. However, we do offer humanitarian support and financial aid to this troubled region. We abstained from the UNESCO vote on the subject of Palestinian statehood. We hold a stance of ‘active neutrality,’ which means that we will be willing to negotiate, offer guidance, and help in any ways possible.

Switzerland would like to see the United Nations offer continued support to the troubled Palestinian people, namely on the West Bank and on the Gaza strip. However, we remain neutral on the subject of Palestinian statehood, as we are close economic partners with Israel and do not believe we have the authority to remove land from their possession.

Over 50 countries similarly supported our abstinence from the UNESCO vote, including the majority of the European Union. Many countries around the world also offer support to these troubled regions of the Middle East.

Israel, the United States, Canada, and Germany were the major powers that voted against Palestinian statehood at UNESCO. France voted in favor. The United States and Israel are the two countries most fervently opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Turkey
Delegate Name: Andrew Szyperski
School: Forest Hills Central High School

It would be reasonable to say that the dispute between the Israelis and Palestinians has been one of the most heated conflicts of the 20th and 21st centuries. There are a number of problems that have hindered the recognition of Palestine as its own country. These problems have stemmed from both sides and to this day stop every bit of progress that the U.N tries to make.

For example, the Palestinians have shown in the past that they are unwilling to compromise. In 1947, a resolution passed that divided the region into two countries that met in Jerusalem. Instead of accepting the terms of this resolution, the Palestinians declared war on the Israelis. Israel, on the other hand, has caused numerous conflicts in attempts to gain land. During the Six Days War, the Israelis took West Bank and East Jerusalem. This proves that Israel is also not willing to settle for just a piece of their Holy Land. This inability to settle for anything less than all of what they think they deserve has pushed this topic to its current state. Recently, there has been much talk about recognizing East Jerusalem, West Bank and Gaza, as well as some undetermined territories, as Palestine. At this point, Israel is not willing to give up lands that they spent human lives to acquire. U.N intervention is needed to solve this issue once and for all because it is clear that neither side is able to compromise on this topic.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: United Kingdom
Delegate Name: Kenny Weeden-Sand
School: Williamston High School

The United Kingdom is very aware of the war between Israel and the Palestine. They have been fighting for many years and the violence has only increased. Thousands of lives have been taken and Israel and Palestine are both at fault for these actions. To obtain peace in the Middle-East, Israel and Palestine must eliminate the fighting. The biggest obstacle these two countries face is this: Israelis support the creation of the Palestinian state, but the existence of a Jewish State is not supported by the Palestinians. I don’t have faith that these countries will ever settle this dispute. This is a religious war, and until the day where everyone shares the same religious views there will always be huge conflicts.

The United Kingdom believes that the issues of permanent status, including that of territory, are for negotiation between the parties. It is not for the United Kingdom to prescribe the form of any Palestinian state. The United Kingdom believes that the Palestine’s statehood undermines peace efforts because it is a unilateral step into deciding an action that can be resolved through negotiations. The United Kingdom also rejects these Israeli measures to change the status of Jerusalem. We are simply not looking to change the status of a country where we are neither allies nor enemies.

The United Nations is a powerful entity and is active in every government our world possesses. The United Kingdom believes that this feud can be solved by negotiation by Israel and Palestine. I trust the UN will make the best and most logical decision. The United Kingdom hopes that the disputes are settled between the governments who wish to engage in deciding another government’s status.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: United States
Delegate Name: Bridget Vial
School: Royal Oak High School

There are criteria that must be established to secure peaceful coexistence of Israel and Palestine. First, there must be a two-state solution. Palestine and Israel must negotiate to create two individual, sovereign nations, as homeland for the Palestinian and Jewish people, respectively. Each nation will be entitled to and responsible for self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace. The United States believes that the borders should be based upon 1967 lines, with Palestine’s contiguous borders neighboring Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. Mutual swaps must occur so that borders remain secure and recognized.

Secondly, it must be agreed upon that neither Palestine nor Israel is ready for the formation of a Palestinian state. Since the Montevideo Convention of 1933, the qualification for statehood have been set to include: a) a permanent population; b ) a defined territory; c ) government; and d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states. Palestine’s unilateral approach to achieving statehood is not only harmful to the peace process but also ineffective, because it is only through negotiations with Israel that permanent, mutually recognized borders can be established. Observer status at the United Nations will not advance the goal of a Palestinian-Israeli resolution, nor improve the lives of Palestinians; direct negotiations are absolutely critical to a lasting peace agreement. The United States also stresses that the Palestinian fiscal crisis must be addressed, and rejects the imposition of preconditions by either state.

A lasting solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict has remained elusive for decades, but the United States remains committed to guiding each party on the road to a peaceful, two-state solution.

Topic: Question of Palestinian Statehood
Country: Zimbabwe
Delegate Name: John Cunningham
School: Williamston High School

Palestine had lost land to Israel and was never fully given their entire original territory back. The Palestinians want their land back and this is creating a lot of violence between Israelis and Palestinians. Over 15,000 lives have been the cost of this violence. The fact that both countries haven’t come to a mutual agreement is confusing to Zimbabwe. An agreement that equally satisfies both should be able to be made peacefully.

Zimbabwe believes the United Nations should use its political conflict resolutions mechanisms within the Security Council and General Assembly to help Palestine and Israel solve these issues. For this to happen and both groups must agree to peace talks. Israel must drop whatever issue they have and at least try the peace talks. The disputed land should be divided equally between the two groups. The countries national sovereignty should be respected and the two countries should also be reminded that member states of the United Nations they should both respect the goal of world peace.

Zimbabwe hopes it gets support in its views that Palestine deserves its rightful homeland that it was robbed of many decades ago. The Palestinian refugees that were driven from the homeland should be helped back to homes. Of course for all of this to happen, Israel must agree to take part in peace talks and give Palestine its rightful territory. Both cultures covet this land because religion. Because of this the United Nations must be careful to keep the countries national rights in mind and not infringe on them. Israel and Palestine must stop the killing and work towards peace. Zimbabwe believes this is the one way to solve this issue but other ways are definitely viable and Zimbabwe is open to suggestions.