Topic: Situation in Georgia
Country: Venezuela
Delegate Name: Colleen Cronin
School: Traverse City West High School
This country wonders at how any nation, with a friendly neighbor in whose own people reside, could possibly consider the protective actions of the Russian Federation extreme. What country would not protect a fellow, friendly, neighboring country as its corrupt, dictating, militaristic government suppressed its people through means of force, denied talks or negotiations with internal local government, and eventually used its army to commit genocide upon its own people?
Certainly the United States would invade, protect, and assist other nations to help, such as it did in the issue involving Haiti and and the issue of Kosovo. Both consisted of governments attacking their own people; as does this issue. But is the United States an avid supporter of terrorized people, slaughtered by their own government? Does the United States, a freed part of the British Empire (that fought for freedom due to the distance in ideology), support a part of another country attempting to free itself (also fighting foreign for freedom)? Is the United States supporting a government of the people, as its Constitution claims is best, by allowing a region of diverse people to create a separate nation from the centralized rule and culture of Georgia?
The answer, my fellow nations, you would think be a certain yes once having considered the ideology, history, and government of the Self-Declared Protectors of the Western Hemisphere (and apparently the East as well). But I speak to you most regretfully of the truth of this matter, of a somber resurrected tragedy the United States is again ripping from the pages of history. This is, painfully, the United States own resurgence of the Cold War; what the United States hopes to gain from the reemergence, we do not know. For political purposes only, the United States' corruption upon NATO demands innocent Ossentian people allow genocide upon themselves. Furthermore, it demands Russia and other capable allies to assist these terrorized people in Ossentia. This is a planned move by the Imperial Western Empire to rekindled once ashened fires between the East and the West. For what other reason would the United States disregard an obvious moral answer to halt genocide to an innocent people?
The United State cannot be allowed to strip nations of their moral obligations to assist their neighbors in times of crisis. What would the United States do, we ask, if the Canadian government rushed an army into Quebec and committed mass genocide? By its own decision, it would remain quiet and watch while Canadians be oppressed and murdered. The Venezuelan government doubts this would be the case. It also reminds all nations of the purpose of this body, to quell violence, halt corruption, and end conflict.
Having brought to attention the disturbances of the United States, and its greedy reason for its action (or lack thereof), as well as its evil influence in the NATO countries to promote bad purposes, and its desire to bring about another division of our world, Venezuela would like to begin discussing the method of resolving and assisting those in this crisis. A major issue in this topic begins with the subject: to whom does Ossentia and the questionable regions belong? Venezuela responds thusly: They belong to themselves, they are a people and not a commodity of the government, not an extension of an organization or a replaceable tool of the Georgian society. We then, as international body, need to assist these people to their decision where they belong. To the Georgian state, the Russian state, or perhaps a separate nation for themselves? The Venezuelan government is the most democratic nation in the world, with 6 elections in the past 4 years, each of them with a official recount and each electing the same candidate. Still, a nation would argue, that nation that demands yet another, a 7th, election in 4 years, that nation that sent officials from its political parties to monitor voting, that nation which demanding UN moniteering of voting, all of said moniteer was deemed legitimate and fair, that nation which did not count over 500 of its own citizens' votes due to ineptitude and may have changed the course of its history. But all other nations agree that Venezuela has legitimate elections by which the same candidate has won fairly and had more executive elections than any other nation, all of which was monitored by the UN and other nations. But the desire of resurgence of the Cold War explains the statements of this nation, apparently. Continuing with the issue, Venezuela hopes that democratic process takes place to allow these questionable regions to determine for themselves where they belong. Voting, due to the direness of this issue, should be compulsive, and the voice of every resident of these lands heard. With this record the UN should assist the people of this region to reach their goal, whatever it may be.
The UN should also not allow for the armies of external forces to enter the Georgian resolution. This includes the Georgian army. For protective purpose against further genocide, the Russian forces should be considered a protector of civilians until the UN can devote a functional Peace Keeping force to the region. Russian forces should not be asked to leave before, as in doing so the Georgian government would certainly reclaim the region and continue further genocide. Venezuela is also certain that the involvement of the European Union is an imperial maneuver, the ministers of which have clearly stated that Georgia would not be admitted to the EU, thus making their involvement as a group unnecessary. We are concerned for the regions that claim independence and do not wish modern colonialization upon them. Venezuela hopes the EU and America will not intervene in this conflict independently and will use the United Nations as a medium through which a solution can be reached. The EU especially has no purpose to be calling for administration privileges between the Georgians, Russians, and Ossentians, which should rightfully fall to the non-partisanship of the United Nations coordinators. France especially has taken a great role as the president of the European Union in this situation, instead of observing the routes through the United Nations to allow for equal diplomacy.
In short, Venezuela calls for the halt of imperial nations upon the subject, UN peacekeeping forces in Ossentia, and UN regulated elections by the people of the region to determine their future as they feel they have lost identity with Georgia.